|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisements has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art … b21f9cc3bd
She continue to make outrageously stupid statements while she crashes in the polls. Does she not see the connection?
What di she say that was so "stupid"? This:
"We want to have safety," she said. "But we also want to have common sense."
That doesn't sound stupid to me. Do you libs think its even possible to have too much regulation?
I wonder what's more stupid, what Bachmann said or the liberal idea that there can never be enough gov't regulation? I'd say it's the latter.
Yes, there's such a thing as too much regulation. However, this isn't a case of too much regulation, which is why what she said is stupid. The problem stems from government regulations being ineffective more than anything else.
If the regulation is ineffective that doesn't mean there isn't too much or that more would make it effective. Obviously a meat packer that slaughters 15 head a week shouldn't have the same constraints as a factory processing 15000 head a week.
Correct and I'm not calling for MORE regulation. I'm talking about the ineffectiveness of the regulations are in place, which is the problem. So, quit assuming my position. You want to know something, then ask a direct question and don't assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a liberal. It's clouding your views.
I want government to properly enforce the regulations already in place without having any need to create more. That means, get rid of the corrupt regulators and other a$$hole not properly doing their job.
Explain? Any meat packer that slaughters anything should have regulations to follow, to ensure safety. If you don't think so, then you've a dangerous view to the rest of society.
But then again all she has to do is have that litte R at the end and she would receive no less that stellar treatment from the lefties. What is it they say about lefties , "they can't do anything right ".Ha ...
I love the way that "a desire to deregulate" was juxtaposed with "e. coli" and now we all associate E. Coli with deregulation.
PS: The "horrendous" outbreak happening in Germany only got about 2,000 people sick, resulting in serious problems in about 400 people, and death in 23. ... how much will the new regulations cost people?
In the US: "FoodNet last year detected 8,256 cases of salmonella poisoning, with 2,290 hospitalizations and 29 deaths."
Let's see... 8,000 cases divided into 300 million ... And E. Coli can be killed by simply cooking your food....
Yeah, how much is this going to cost us?
A much cheaper solution: http://www.ehow.com/how_2074008_prevent-e-coli.html
That isn't true. E-coli and many other bacteria can form spores (hardened shells) that makes them extremely heat-resistant.
The tips in the e-how article are good steps, but far from foolproof.
It's yet another example of Bachmann being a slave to ideology at the expense of science.
by Ralph Deeds5 years ago
Economists Agree: Solutions Are ElusiveBy EDUARDO PORTERPublished: April 23, 2013 "Last week the International Monetary Fund hosted a conference of some of the world’s top macroeconomists to assess...
by fishskinfreak20088 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36693944/ns … _business/Is the president becoming more of a negativist? This is troubling. He ran and was elected on a platform of "change" and "hope".
by SportsBetter5 years ago
Freedom of choice or government entitlements and regulations?
by I am DB Cooper7 years ago
There are rumors floating around today that Minnesota representative Michele Bachmann is considering a 2012 presidential run. Bachmann is seen as a far right conservative and the polar opposite of Senator Al Franken,...
by Jack Lee14 months ago
It is a question that baffles me.You would think people who became a huge success in our capitalism system would embrace it and try to promote it. Yet, again and again, we see these folks adopt a liberal and progressive...
by mikelong6 years ago
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07 … k1%7C77674If businesses could play by the rules, perhaps they wouldn't need to be watched...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.