Somewone please explain this to me:
Explain David's graphic portrayal of Jesus' death by crucifixion (Psalm 22) 1000 years previous to crucifixion even being established as a form of capital punishment?
and then written down some 150 years later?
It is Suspicious at best as Crucifixion would not have been on any one's mind a thousand years before??????
But yet 150 years after He lived, after the Romans invented it! It is then written down as profacy? Convient don't ya yhink?
As far as I can tell, the only thing relating to a "graphic portrayal" of Jesus' crucifixion in Psalm 22 is "they pierced my hands and my feet" in verse 16. That's it. It doesn't explicitly mention a cross or the concept of crucifixion.
First of all, "piercing hands and feet" can mean many things. Maybe the author had in mind minor flesh wounds, not a total "piercing." Or it might be metaphorical. The rest of this chapter, AND the rest of Psalm, AND the rest of the Bible, has a ton of metaphorical stuff. How do we know these particular seven words (NKJV) were intended to be literal, while most of the rest was intended to be metaphorical? Why not flip it around? Or better yet, why believe any of it?
Second, scholars believe that to crucify someone you would have had to drive the nails through the wrists or forearms, not the hands. Driving the nails through the hands would not work because it would not support the weight of the body on the cross. Thus, assuming Jesus was crucified, this is not even an accurate description of his crucifixion! Thus technically there is, ironically, NOTHING in this chapter relating to the actual crucifixion.
Third, with so many words in the Bible describing so many different scenes and different acts and personalities and lifestyles and beliefs and events, it is almost guaranteed that SOMETHING will resemble actual historical events at some point or another. It is simply the law of large numbers. The same could be said for any large work of literature, like "Crime and Punishment" for example. Yet nobody believes Dostoyevsky was a prophet of God (except my high school English teacher, of course).
Fourth, this chapter contains a lot of extraneous information that nobody claims relates to the crucifixion, such as this: "Save Me from the lion’s mouth And from the horns of the wild oxen!" (Psalm 22: 21).
Was there a lion and/or wild oxen at Jesus' crucifixion? Uh... no.
Christians read into the text what they want to read.
your not addressing what I asked, the interpretation of that text is the problem, it is taught as it describes parts of a crucifixtion 1000 years ahead of its time, when they had no concept of that for a punsihment. Daniel would not have known this at all. Even just the nails in Hands nd feet parts.
now, we see it written some 150 years after the death, and after the fact. that The Romans made it a form of punishment, so in the writings we now have, even though the writer does describe it, the modern readers reflect it as Profacy..?
it is very suspicious becuase of this. Suspicions that this part of the story could be man made, not all true? The facts do not equal the story passed around.
that is the issue I am asking about. The factual History of the time, not The made up meanings of the man made words in the script, written some 150 years later.
and I entertain nothing to do with Lions, Oxen, nothing but what were the historical facts of the time.
and yes, Christians read all of this into it, (OX, Lamb- what ever) when they should be concerened with facts. Not obscure meanings, or hidden meanings not there of the words. I agree with you.
and I submit this example is one of so many, as to how we get far away from the real words..?
Read what I wrote. I specifically said the Psalm does not say anything about a crucifixion. He did not write "nails" in the hands and feet, he wrote "pierce" which can mean many things, as I said.
And again, I reiterate, an actual crucifixion would not have nails driven through the hands, because it would not support the weight of the body. The nails would go through the wrists or forearms.
There was nothing written about the crucifixion 1000 years beforehand.
In June of 1968, bulldozers working north of Jerusalem accidentally laid bare tombs dating from the first century B.C. and the first century A.D. Greek archeologist Vasilius Tzaferis was instructed by the Israeli Department of Antiquities to carefully excavate these tombs. Subsequently one of the most exciting finds of recent times was unearthed - the first skeletal remains of a crucified man. The most significant factor is its dating to around the time of Christ. The skeleton was of a man named Yehohanan son of Chaggol, who had been crucified between the age of 24 and 28. Mr. Tzaferis wrote an article in the Jan/Feb. 1985 issue of the secular magazine Biblical Archaeology Review (BAR), and here are some of his comments regarding crucifixion in Jesus' time:
At the end of the first century B.C., the Romans adopted crucifixion as an official punishment for non-Romans for certain limited transgressions. Initially, it was employed not as a method of execution, but only as a punishment. Moreover, only slaves convicted of certain crimes were punished by crucifixion. During this early period, a wooden beam, known as a furca or patibulum was placed on the slave's neck and bound to his arms.
http://www.bible.ca/d-history-archeolog … -cross.htm
Ya gotta love the bible and quoran when it comes to belief. You can make either of them say whatever you like pretty much.
There is a contradiction or a way out of every position simply because of the numbers as possibilities previously stated.
Best always to look at the psychology of the statements attributed to the god to see what is really going on.
No matter who it was speaking to or when in history, psychotic behaviour and words tell their own tale, and it is one of hate fear and loathing, hardly godly traits, more akin to a psychotic depot.
I agree, it really does turn very psychotic?
thats what amased me about the teaching of that Psalm. back when those folks exhisted, we were far far to basic to come up with all of that crapola, they were hunter gatherer types, fighting for exhistance. The sophistication of a God and a Gods action came much later after man evolved more.
you can sit back and see the psychology of control being used to the n-th degree in it, all man made. man watching man develope and deviately thinking how to gain power; to scare and control him.
If you just think clearly, No Omniscent being would ever need of that.
Exactly right! omni stupid is about where it sat then and astonishingly....... now for many!
we really are backing up are we not....lol
Was not thinking like that, but yep, we are
I hope some will answer here in a conversation and realise quoting scripture, and the personal interpretation of it is the crux of the problem
No the problem is that people do not want to honor God. They do not want to know God- so therefore they do not know God.
They do not want to understand the word of God- they just want to argue about it.
Where strife and envy are there is every evil work.
God has called all people to come and be saved by accepting Jesus and those that answer when He calls are the chosen that chose to trust, honor, and obey God. God can only use willing people- if people would humble thereselves and approach God in the right way God would do mighty things in there lives.
by A Ercoli6 years ago
How do dinosaurs fit into the Biblical story of Creation?
by cascoly7 years ago
Are there any precursors to the Biblical story of original sin?Are there any precursors to the Biblical story of original sin? Does any other cultural tradition consider all humans to be born out of the state of...
by Alexander A. Villarasa19 months ago
Humans, from way back when we started language as a communication tool, used metaphors as a linguistic mechanism to express otherwise abstract ideas into something concrete. Linguists have argued that...
by LINEOFPROGRESSION8 years ago
Luke 19:27 Jesus said, "But these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slay them in my presence." Is it OK for Christians to kill non-believers? ...
by AKA Winston6 years ago
Many claim that the gospels were written by the disciples of Jesus and the bible is the inerrant word of god - if that is so, then why do the gospels disagree when it comes to the day of the week and the time of day...
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter3 weeks ago
Christians have their view and reasons for it. This doesn't matter as far as salvation. Salvation is a personal relationship with Jesus Christ because He shed blood for our sins and we accepted His sacifice...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.