ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

NBA 2010 Conference Finals Officiating: What's Up?

Updated on June 11, 2010

I have seen it at its worst during the Lakers-Thunder Playoff Series, but I kind of saw some of same at the Lakers-Los Suns Western Conference Finals.

And so I say again, what the …?

I wrote about this at my hub regarding the Los Angeles Lakers-Oklahoma Thunder Series.

But what’s up with that? Here we go again. Again?

Game 6, 2010 NBA Western Conference Finals, the Suns backup point guard, Dragic comes over to fellow Yugoslav Laker Vujacic again, the same as he did in Game 5.

Again, the result is the same in both games, Vujagic getting the worse end of the referee’s whistle.

I know, Suns fans will say Vujacic should have gotten that Technical Foul in Game 5 (it was actually a double Technical call on both Goran and Sasha). And of course they would also argue that he also deserved that Flagrant Foul in Game 6.

But c’mon, it was his fellow countryman from the Phoenix Suns who was the initiator of the contact, in both occurrences. And for the record, I think flopping in the NBA has become ridiculous, all teams included. And in my book, sorry Goran, that was a flop.

Go on NBA officials and NBA fans, watch the clips. I hope for the next season, the NBA will create an anti-flopping move. I heard one NBA announcer say make it a foul to do so. I think, make it a technical foul. Please, you are professional athletes, you get paid a whole lot, to take some pain.

But taking nothing from Dragic, he was a beast in Game 6 and of course it was Steve Nash who was the beast in Game 5. And so they played a big part in the way the Suns climbed up from 18 points down in both games to tie it after a made three-point shot at Game 5 and to come within 3 in Game 6.

It makes for great drama though, when the opponents of Lakers can make it happen especially if they need a little help from the refs whistles.

And I am not saying that these games maybe an offshoot from the 2008 NBA Referee Scandal.

But I'll let you be the judge of this.

But think about it, especially after Tim Donaghy, the 2008 NBA whistle blower referee (pardon the pun) blowed the lid off biased calls that were made by two NBA referees who officiated a Playoff Game. (Remember the Lakers were finalists in 2008 and 2009. And miraculously again this year).

This is the backdrop here, Tim became a whistle blower following investigations about his own biased calls which supposedly made by him because he had made bets on games he was officiating in.

Talk about the NBA’s worst nightmare and talk about stirring up a hornet’s nest. And it’s kind of the same kind of thing we are hearing from disgraced cyclist Floyd Landis, but that’s another story, I may write about in the near future.

Going back to the NBA, according to Tim Donaghy, way back in the 2002 NBA Season, he had found out from Referee A that Referees A and Referee F wanted to extend a series to seven games. (You know, more games, more fun, more money)

Tim stated that he knew Referees A and F to be “company men”, meaning always acting in the interest of the NBA, and for that night, it was in the NBA's interest to add another game to that particular series.

Now, the teams were not named, but the 2002 Western Conference Finals was the only seven-game series that year and it was the Lakers who won Game 6 (thus extending the series to a game 7).

Looking at the stats, the Los Angeles Lakers attempted 18 more free throws than the Kings in the fourth quarter, and went on to win the 2002 NBA Finals.

Now, flash forward to 2010, and the Lakers are back in the Playoffs, back in the Western Conference Finals and don’t tell me that it is only the Lakers fans who are noticing the biased calls against the Los Angeles Lakers, especially when the games are played in the opposing team’s home court.

Here are the stats for the Lakers-Thunders 2010 First Round Western Conference Playoff Series: (I will only concentrate in the statistics on Free throws awarded and the Fouls called)

Game 1 at LA (Visiting team even had the edge in both FTs and PFs)

Free Throws (FTs)

Home Team 22

Visitor 24

Personal Fouls (PFs)

Home Team 27

Visitor 21

Game 2 at LA (Visiting team even had the edge in FTs, Home court slight edge on PFs)

FTs

Home Team 32

Visitor 33

PFs

Home Team 30

Visitor 26

Game 3 at OK (Home team had the edge in both FTs and PFs)

FTs

Home Team 34

Visitor 12

PFs

Home Team 19

Visitor 26

Game 4 at OK (Home team had the edge in both FTs and PFs)

FTs

Home Team 48

Visitor 28

PFs

Home Team 23

Visitor 30

Game 5 at LA (Home team had slight edge in both FTs and PFs)

FTs

Home Team 31

Visitor 24

PFs

Home Team 19

Visitor 25

Game 6 at OK (Home team had the edge in FTs and slight edge in PFs)

FTs

Home Team 31

Visitor 14

PFs

Home Team 19

Visitor 21

And here are the stats for the Lakers-Suns 2010 Western Conference Finals.

Game 1 at LA Staples (Phoenix, the visiting team had more free throws than the home team-LA)

FT FO

LA 22 21

PH 32 23

Game 2 at LA Staples (The home team-LA had a few more free throws but also have a few more fouls called on them—so more or less two nice home games at LA)

FT FO

LA 34 26

PH 26 23

Game 3 at Phoenix (Now, the same as what happened in the LA-OK Series, the calls took a weird turn, the visiting team LA, have more fouls and the home team PH was awarded more than double the number of free throws)

FT FO

LA 20 28

PH 42 21

Game 4 at Phoenix (Again still in Phoenix, and again the visiting team LA, have almost double the number of fouls than the home team PH and was again the home team was awarded a lot more free throws)

FT FO

LA 13 23

PH 32 12

Game 5 at LA Staples (Back to LA, much of the same with Games 1 and 2, more or less a nicely officiated game)

FT FO

LA 23 24

PH 29 21

Game 6 at Phoenix (Back to Phoenix, and fearing some really good home cooking, the Lakers made it difficult for the home team to beat them, well up until the Flagrant Foul on Sasha Vujacic on Goran Dragic. And fortunately, there weren’t any significant discrepancy on the number of free throws awarded and the number of fouls called)

FT FO

LA 28 23

PH 29 19

Calling David Stern…

Anyway, it’s again a Boston Celtics and Los Angeles Lakers NBA Finals Year, so what else can we say?

May the best team win, free throws and fouls notwithstanding.

Let the games begin!

Real or OverBoard, you be the judge?

2010 NBA Finals Poll

Who Will Win the 2010 NBA FInals?

See results

Do You Want To Leave A Comment:

 

≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡

Click here to sign up and you can do so right now.

You can even compose your own articles,

publish them online and make some money on the side.

Click here to learn more.

≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡

Comments

Submit a Comment

  • J@ps profile imageAUTHOR

    J@ps 

    8 years ago from Southern California

    Random is a good word kcreery. I'll buy that. Thanks. I might have to start a new hub about flopping and officiating especially within the last two minutes of any Finals Games.

  • J@ps profile imageAUTHOR

    J@ps 

    8 years ago from Southern California

    Nice of you to tell us who you're root for wade11hicks.

    Thanks for commenting.

  • kcreery profile image

    Kevin 

    8 years ago from Whistler Canada

    Nice hub. Officiating is very random in the NBA. The stars get the call except with Kobe which is ok with me.

  • wade11hicks profile image

    wade11hicks 

    8 years ago

    WACKKK FORGET THE LAKERS BOSTON ALL THE WAY BABYYYYY

working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)