Were Protons Accelerated To Reach The Speed Of Light In The Large Hadron Collider?
A particle accelerated to reach the speed of light will begin to reduce in size when nearing the speed of light. According to this theory, at 90% the speed of light, the length of the particle in its direction of motion of will reduce to 50% of its original length. Thereafter its reduction in length will be logarithmic such that at 100% the speed of light, its "length" would reach zero. The protons in the Hadron Collider were accelerated to 99.999% the speed of light. In this case, the "diameter" of the protons would have shrunk to near zero. Did this happen in the Hadron Collider experiment?
yes, they were able to do that and as the resultant of it they were able to create black holes otherwise they couldn't have done this, though those black holes were small in size. The small size of those black holes was just due to the participation of very less number of accelerated particles and other than that it was just on the experimental basis which covered almost a negligible area as compared to original black holes.
No, nothing can actually reach the speed of light. The particles at the Large Hadron Collider can reach 99.9999991% the speed of light when at full power. Reference: http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/lhc/Facts-en.html
Interesting question! The contraction is relative to the observer. For example, if you happend to be travelling parallel to the particle (so that the particle appeared stationary to you) there would be no contraction. But stood stationary relative to the particle accelerator, relative to you the particles in the LHC will appear to contract (in accordance with the Lorentz Lenth Contraction formula). See the following link. Plug in some figures - it's actually really interesting.
With regard to a particle having zero length at 100% of the speed of light, this is actually an impossible scenario, as Einstein's equstion E=mc^2 shows. This tells us the more energy you put into a particle (i.e. to accelerate it) the more the particle increases with mass. But, the more mass a particle has the more energy is needed to accelerate it. Therefore, to accelerate a particle to the speed of light would take an infinite amount of energy! Which is obviously impossible.
To explain it more than this I will have to pass over to someone with a much bigger brain than me!
Yeah, sure. When the velocity tends to "c" (speed of light) the mass tends to infinity. There were two options for me to include in my question. One involving the diminishing size and the other involving increase in mass. Thanks for responding
You answered the question yourself. They came close ot the speed of light but did not reach it. The radius of the proton as seen from the laboratory would have shrunk, though the term radius implies a well defined particle which is not the case at the micro scale. I think technically the cross section, the radius perpendicular to the direction of travel did not shrink but I am not expert in this field so I could be wrong.
by Scott Mandrake 9 years ago
After reading so much feedback on the global warming issue, I wondered if anyone had any thoughts on this Large Hadron Collider thing going on in Switzerland. Apparently they are trying to make little black holes and the like. Must be important as they have so far spent billions of...
by Jen King 9 years ago
17 miles of particle smashing goodness.We're back in action after a year of repairs.Nerds rejoice
by Dmian 8 years ago
The Large Hadron Collider just made a "mini big bang" What do you think about it?
by harishkumarjk 8 years ago
What is meant by The Large Hadron Collider and its purpose?
by elisabeth reid 10 years ago
Scientific progress or hype or playing with fire? Is it a waste of time and money or is there something important to be discovered from it?What do you think?
by quicksand 6 years ago
Large Hadron Collider Protons At 99% Speed Of Light - Two Beams Collide - Why Accelerate Both Beams?Since the velocity of one beam relative to the other was not twice 99.9999991% the speed of light, as the laws of relative velocity are not applicable at that level, (or are they?) why accelerate two...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|