Fatfist,
Another definition of troll would be the "god of strawmen", as trolls create arguments from dust and reinvent other peoples' statements to make them appear refutable.
aka-dj,
Have you a clue as to what you are arguing about or with whom? Everyone is capable of imagination. To understand imagined perfection is not to embrace it as valid. I understand the concept of Santa Claus, too, but I do not accept that imagined concept as real.
The idea that it is somehow shameful to be a human being comes from Christianity and original sin doctrine. Eliminate that one dumbass concept and it becomes perfectly all right to be nothing more than a human, like everyone else.
The conflict only comes with the imagined idea of godly perfection. Eliminate that distorted concept, and we are all completely and truly equal. I'm OK; You're OK.
Eliminate the false comparison to a perfect god and, poof!, the tension of being "displeasing to god" disappears.
I see you have no clue, of who I am either.
Contrary to your accusation, I never said it was shameful to be a human being. Though you are suggesting it must be the case, since you point to me when you say it.
You seem to understand the doctrine of sin etc. but fail abysmally at Grace.
But, of course, there is no case to answer as Jesus never existed (in you'all's minds), so the whole issue is technically irrelevant.
Nice try, mate!
aka-dj,
I asked you point blank if you had a clue as to your argument. That is neither ridicule nor name calling. You continue to misrepresent my statements and then attempt to create a strawman to defeat what you think I said.
I ask you again - do you have a clue as to your argument that perfection (a human concept) is not the sole basis for human conflict with our nature?
I asked you also if you knew with whom you were arguing as you continually misrepresent my postions.
I cannot help it if you take offense to being called out for not producing a reasonable rebuttle.
(Contrary to your accusation, I never said it was shameful to be a human being)
aka-dj,
Whether you take a discussion about belief systems as a personal attack is up to you. I do understand that deeply held belief is often intertwined with ego so that self feels as if it is being attacked. So let me try another tact.
Would you agree that a human being who rejects your god is in a precarious position? If so, what is there about that position that is dangerous?
Now, as a thought experiment, imagine neither you nor anyone else believes there is any danger to non-belief. Would you feel guilty about wanting to have sex with the hot 18-year-old next door?
My point being that sexual urges are completely and totally natural to the human species, so that any feeling of guilt about having natural feelings can only occur in response to a belief in an unnatural view of the ideal. The guilt (or shame) for being unable to meet this unnatural ideal is the cause of the tension that requires forgiveness.
Eliminate this self-created tension, and the need for forgiveness disappears as well.
I don't believe in the idea of original sin, but seriously?
If that is the reason why people feel guilty about wanting to have sex with an 18yr old, then I (as the mother of a child that turns 18 next month) am all for the idea!
Religion may or may not have anything to do with that particular issue per person, but (and I am far from a prude) SHOULDN'T you feel guilty about it? Isn't guilt just a nice, wonderful little fail safe that says "What you are thinking about is bad, don't do it"?
Those "natural urges" to do things that we really shouldn't do need all the failsafes that they can get. Guilt isn't a bad thing. Thinking about doing bad things is supposed to feel bad.
I presume this in response to my post, re definition of troll. No, I was merely answering the troll issue. I took nothing as apersonal attack (from you).
Simply this. Jesus came to seek and to save that which was lost. Since He is the only way to the Father, those who reject Him, will die in their sins. Rather precarious, don't you think?
Note, I didn't ask you to agree with the theology, just that it exists in scripture!!
I have no such a neighbour!
Guilt over wrong(doing) is a matter of conscience. If you have one, you will feel guilty. If you wrong often enough, your conscience will be desensitised, and it will no longer convict you.
It's not a self defeating concept, somehow introduced by (the) church, or religion. They have merely capitalized on it to control people with it.
i don't think people should ever feel guilty about thinking about having sex or for thinking about killing someone or thinking anything. it's only if we actually hurt someone or plan to hurt them that we need to feel guilty. die gedanken sind frei.
and even then, the purpose of guilt is to get us to change course. once we've made amends or changed, it's bye-bye to guilt.
The only societal structures that adhere to a doctrine that it is not OK to be born human are religious ones - in these structures one must commit some act of contrition in order to be OK. This silly notion should be enough to reject these ideas out of hand instead of being reasons for voluminous justifications for why it is necessary within the belief system to so such and such.
The tail is wagging the dog - the belief system is the cause of the consternation.
(I will take this as a yes. God "could have done it" then)
aka-dj,
Regardless of what you take, you should try to read and comprehend. I specifically stated that it depends of the definition of god. Creation ex nihilo by the Abrahamic god is a non-sensical assertion.
(Oh, and may I say, all of these above concepts come straight from the Bible. They are not merely "my opinion".)
Geez, dj, it gets really frustrating trying to communicate with you as you don't seem to grasp the significance of the points made - opinion (no yours but anyone's) simply divides subjective from objective. The bible offers no objective validation of its claims, therefore anything it says is simply opinion, i.e., a subjective claim.
Why is it a nonsensical notion? Just because you either don't understand it, or refuse to accept it?
You say the Bible offers no objective validation? You cannot have objective validation of a past event(s). All you have is evidence of the event. In this case, everything we are a part of in this world, IS the evidence. It (all) came about from "something, at some time".
The Bible merely gives you an explanation of HOW, just like many scientists, in various fields (try) to explain the same thing. Also subjective!
No-one can pick up (the) creation event, observe and explain it objectively.
(Moses did apart the river through the help of the stick. Mohammed did the moon into two parts and he visited God)
And the neighbor's dog really did talk.
Thank you, Son of Sam, for your imput. We always welcome the rants of the mentally ill in our midst.
(Guilt over wrong(doing) is a matter of conscience)
aka-dj,
What about the guilt of the act of simply being born human? Where does a child learn the guilt associated with normal human emotions and cravings?
If a child sees a piece of candy, he will reach out an take it because he wants it. That it is not his is not in his cognitive processes. He learns about stealing when someone slaps his hand and says, no.
Thus, the conflict between the action of stealing and not stealing stems from learned behavior, not any inner portal of morality.
i think an older child who has developed a bond with its parents begins to realize that others are humans whom we don't want to hurt, because they are like us, and we don't like being hurt. thus, a child doesn't need to be specifically told that stealing is wrong. he can intuit it from the fact that he knows he is human like others and wouldn't like to be stolen from.
(HOWEVER, suppose for a moment (if you can) that there IS an ALL POWERFUL, WISE, LOVING GOD, Who can do ALL of this, and more. then it becomes perfectly "logical & feasible" for these miracles to occur)
Aka-Dj, how could you suppose that this is true? You are asking us to believe in something that can't possibly happen to make your argument feasible?
I wrote a hub on this:
http://philanthropy2012.hubpages.com/hu … s-A-Sadist
aka-dj,
What you overlook is that knowledge has gained but religious belief has not kept pace with that knowledge.
Would you concede that it is an absurd notion that to keep a volcano from erupting that a virgin need be sacrificed yearly into the mouth of the volcano? What is the difference between you ( who I imagine agrees that it is an absurd belief) and the chieftan to orders the virgin sacrificed? The only difference is in a gain in knowledge about the geological sciences so that now educated chieftans understand that the forces that cause the eruption are not interrupted by virgin deaths.
In the first century stories about miraculous events were not uncommon and widely accepted as true, and many heroes were declared to have been taken whole into heaven, but science has now learned that humans cannot reanimate, cannot fly unaided into the clouds, cannot walk on water, cannot turn water into wine, and cannot become pregnant due to the whims of some occult spirit.
The only difference between the beliefs of the chieftan and his virgin and the beliefs of the modern religionist is that the absurd religious belief is tolerated due to societal decisions to give religions a pass on the need for verification.
If we did not do so, perhaps we could then find genuine human conditions to help alleviate the problems that religions try to solve - solutions that apply to everyone, not simply a group of believers.
You have me confused with organised religion!!
The Bible, to date, has not only supported scientific discoveries
(with the exception of biased interpretation of the data/evidence)
but, in many instances pre dated the discoveries made. (IE, flat earth).
Archaeology, is another example of document integrity, of ancient writings.
I see no conflict myself.
(You have me confused with organised religion!!)
aka-dj,
I always thought you were LDS. Not accurate?
(I see no conflict myself)
I understand that - it is quite dark in there.
The bible is not a historical document and cannot be offered as realiable proof of the miraculous. To argue your case you have to do more than simply claim that god has magical powers because you say so.
Ah another atheist abstraction of reality. Just another attempt to invalidate the tenants of virtue and morality in the name of nothingness...... Brought to you by your friends at the freedom from religion foundation.
Fear is based only on perspective. God brings only light, truth and power.
I think it is easy to get ideas of religion and of God confused, because we are used to the god of the religion we are most familiar with. I have great difficulty in accepting the gods of religion, because they are so obviously based upon manmade truths. And the fact that different religions have different ideas of god, would seem to suggest that they cannot all be right. However, I think science is moving nearer to some concept of the supernatural. Quantum mechanics seems especially to talk in the language of the supernatural, and the old mechanistic view of the universe is giving way to ideas which were once considered to be science-fiction.
As a result, I am finding myself considering the possibility of an intelligence in the universe. I don't know if God would be the best word to describe such an intelligence, because of the religious ideas this brings with it.
This thread happened during the heyday of HP. Since it left off, several good and worthy people have dropped out of the forums, and I find it very sad. It seems to me that the fun, entertaining and lively discussions have ceased.
Great man, Ernestshub has gone to the Forum In The Sky. I don't see Melissa, Brenda, AKA around these days. Hope life is good for all those in the Land of the Living.
Yes, in was more entertaining and informed.
by Claire Evans 7 years ago
This topic is old, I know, but I'd like to ask it anyway. Many Christians will ask an atheist, "Why are you here if you don't believe God (should it be a Christian thread)?" Some will answer, "Because I'm trying to help you see the errors of your ways. Is this...
by Steve Andrews 12 years ago
On Facebook I know of at least two profiles where the people running them have offended some Pagans by comments they have made from a Christian viewpoint and links they have posted. I have seen this sort of problem before. So my question is: can Christians and Pagans be friends or do the belief...
by pisean282311 13 years ago
what does word believer mean to christians?..do muslims or buddist or any other faith fall in category of non believer and if you are muslim or any other faith , do christians and other faiths fall in category of non believers?
by Stump Parrish 8 years ago
A reader of my local paper (The Spartanburg Herald-Journal www.goupstate.com) sent this comment to our opinion section "The Stroller": TAKE MY CHANCES': "A local reader" observes that as Christmas approaches there seems to be a proliferation of comments from people who tend to...
by savvydating 10 years ago
Atheists, do you despise Jesus or just religions (in general) that worship God?Such God worshiping religions would include Judaism and Islam. Also, did something happen to you to make you angry about "God" or is this just a scientific decision you made in college?? Many atheists demand...
by Rad Man 9 years ago
“It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.” Dogs being non-Isrealites.“Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel. As you go, proclaim this message: ‘The kingdom of heaven has come near.’"Why do you call...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |