Who do you think is more qualified to be commander in chief,Hillary or The Donal

1. 59

   mio cidposted 7 years ago

   Who do you think is more qualified to be commander in chief,Hillary or The Donald?
   
   Of all the responsibilities this may be the most important to be expected of a president.What qualifies each candidate to be commander in chief?
   
   

   replyreport
2. 70

   mike102771posted 7 years ago

   None of the Above. If we chose people for their military qualification then we would only elect generals as leaders.

   replyreport
   1. 59

      mio cidposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      I agree many things are taken into consideration when electing a president but my question is directed at this particular subject.

      replyreport
3. 50

   bradmasterOCcalposted 7 years ago

   The question asks about which of the two people Hillary or Donald.
   Not Hillary as she couldn't even handle Benghazi and National Security.
   So Trump.

   replyreport
   1. 59

      mio cidposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      So what do you think qualifies Trump to be commander in chief?

      replyreport
   2. 50

      bradmasterOCcalposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      First, he wants to build a border to protect us at home. He is interested in protecting the country from the Muslim Terrorists, while his opponents want to bring unvetted immigrants into the country. He knows how to find the best people to do the job

      replyreport
4. 62

   Yossarian22posted 7 years ago

   
   
   Judging by personality and temperament, Trump is nothing more than a schoolyard bully who should never be commander of the largest and greatest military force on the planet.
   So, that leaves Hillary Clinton, who at least has the presence of mind not to resort to constant name-calling. She certainly doesn't have to prove that she has the "hugest" swinging pissing contest organs. She knows for a fact that the USA is the greatest country in the world because she has negotiated with many other countries.
   While Clinton may have made mistakes along the way, she has learned from them. Trump, on the other hand keeps repeating his mistakes and boasts about them (FOUR bankruptcies!) Hundreds of lawsuits!
   Trump fits the very definition of 'racist' as confirmed by Paul Ryan, and yet Trump never learns, nor attempts to learn, to get along with others.
   Trump also fits the definition of "insane" since he keeps REPEATING himself over and over and over and expects different results.
   Neither has "military" experience, but it is not required for the Presidency and the title of Commander in Chief.

   replyreport
   1. 50

      bradmasterOCcalposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      The bad people in this world respect only one thing and that is Power. They have taken advantage of leaders that want to handle things softly. That dn mean war, what it means is to project a powerful image, instead of a meek wishy washy one.

      replyreport
   2. 44

      Ericdierkerposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      I would like to see a single reference to Hillary stating clearly that the USA is the greatest country on earth. I thought she thought that America is the cause of all the problems in the world, at least that is how she acts. Please reference.

      replyreport
   3. 62

      Yossarian22posted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Eric, you must not have caught her speech on Foreign Affairs. She clearly stated that the USA is the greatest force on earth, and that she thinks "make America great again" is an oxymoron. We are already great!

      replyreport
   4. 59

      mio cidposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      I agree 100 percent with bradmaster0Cal that an Image of strength is necessary.Erick Diercker We don’t call the country we love a disaster or a laughing stock. We know America already is the greatest country on Earth.First rally w Obama clear enough?

      replyreport
   5. 50

      bradmasterOCcalposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Yossarian
      None of what you say in your comment is based on fact.  I dn have enuf chars.
      The US cn by def go bankrupt, but $20 trillion in debt is bankrupt. Priv sec BR is a tax method, not a failure.Trump came back up, the US only goes deeper in debt

      replyreport
   6. 44

      Ericdierkerposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Mio please clarify that. I don't get your reference.

      replyreport
   7. 62

      Yossarian22posted 7 years agoin reply to this

      You guys do realize that the US military is already the biggest show of strength on this planet? Check the FACTS on the military budget.

      replyreport
   8. 44

      Ericdierkerposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Interesting. Vietnam has about 5 million folk available as soldiers. China about 3 million. US a bit over 1 million. Just a thought for comparison. US also has a strong anti-military contingent detracting from the actual use of our military.

      replyreport
   9. 62

      Yossarian22posted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Are you joking? We have ONE button that will utterly annihilate the entire planet 5 times over! Are you ignorant of the MIGHT of the US military???? Try serving on ONE nuclear submarine and say that again!

      replyreport
   10. 59

       mio cidposted 7 years agoin reply to this

       Eric Dierker , Clarifying,  On her first joint  campaign rally with Obama, Hillary said what I posted before.I'm sure if i look more I'll find more instances where she said America greatest country in the world.

       replyreport
   11. 44

       Ericdierkerposted 7 years agoin reply to this

       Nope Yassarian, a weapon that is totally impractical to use and has not been used in over 65 years does not make might. Boots on the ground is might. And that requires a willingness to use it, which Hillary does not possess.

       replyreport
   12. 62

       Yossarian22posted 7 years agoin reply to this

       Eric, you could not be more wrong about that. We are not only ready, willing, and able to put boots on the ground anywhere in the world, we have the technology to defeat any enemy WITHOUT boots on the ground. And it will be an agreement of many first

       replyreport
5. 86

   tamarawilhiteposted 7 years ago

   Hillary Clinton refused to increase security for the Benghazi consulate despite multiple requests by the ambassador - then he died, and she blamed a poorly dubbed Youtube video for a mob of Muslim militants who showed up with rocket launchers at Benghazi and several other US facilities.
   She cut back on security for other consulates, spending it instead on environmental projects and locally bought art. When looking pretty and feeling good is more important than protecting those serving the nation, she is not qualified to hold office.

   replyreport
   1. 59

      mio cidposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      If you research the issue you will find that most of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh talking points are false.

      replyreport
   2. 62

      Yossarian22posted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Recent investigative reports found that the Republicans cut funding for security in Benghazi! Please quit blaming Hillary, and the conspiracy accusations. That incident has been investigated to death and Hillary was found 'not at fault'.

      replyreport