One child around four years old testified that a certain adult person abused, and killed another child. I felt he was telling the truth and was credible. The jury didn't. They voted not guilty, and the man was freed. They said the man was trying to help the child and the four-year old was confused and thought the man was killing the child.
In another case, a child drowned, and her brother testified that the mother had pushed and held her under the water. I felt he said whatever they wanted him to. They had him draw a picture of what he saw. The picture could have been the mom drowning the child or of her trying to save her.
I didn't find him credible. He said the girl was killed two times.
The jury believed he and the woman was convicted for murder.
My question is: Do you think children this young should testify in court?
No. Remember the school the witch coven trials of not to long ago.
I also say No! A young child cannot comprehend everything they see or possibly hear.
It could even traumatize the child, especially if a few years later and he/she gains more understanding and may realize they made a life altering mistake to someone else.
by crankalicious2 years ago
I was reading the recently released grand jury information on the Jon Benet Ramsey case. While there's no apparent DNA link between the parents and the murder, I must admit that I'm apt to be suspicious of the parents...
by Mom Kat6 years ago
If a couple has joint custody and one parent decides they want to take the other to court for full - what exactly does that parent have to prove as a substantial enough reason for the courts to order the change?Is it up...
Copyright © 2016 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.