This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
jump to last post 1-21 of 21 discussions (39 posts)

We own GM stock. Who's going to celebrate tonight?

  1. puppascott profile image76
    puppascottposted 8 years ago

    Who's happy with the job our elected officials are doing on this one. Our government hasn't saved GM or Chrysler from bankruptcy using your money. Now they are in the position of having a say in how they are run. What do think, as a stock holder?

    1. Jimmy Fuentes profile image56
      Jimmy Fuentesposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Does that mean we can write off our GM cars as a company vehicle now that we own them?

      1. tony0724 profile image59
        tony0724posted 8 years agoin reply to this

        good point Jimmy !

  2. tony0724 profile image59
    tony0724posted 8 years ago

    Well puppa I feel like you we have been ripped off one more time ! Can I cash In my shares ?

  3. puppascott profile image76
    puppascottposted 8 years ago

    I'll buy'em all. Do you take MC, Visa, Paper Clips, Monopoly Money...?

  4. FreshtoDeath profile image54
    FreshtoDeathposted 8 years ago

    What other options were available to the administration?

    1. puppascott profile image76
      puppascottposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      It should never have been the government's option in the first place. Private business is private business. The government shouldn't be doing "business" in the private sector.

    2. nicomp profile image68
      nicompposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Obviously the best option would have been to let the free market sort it out. Rather than flushing 100 billion taxpayer dollars; allow GM to file Chapter 11, stay out of the way, and let the legal system sort it out. The excess capacity is shed and GM emerges stronger. That option has worked for over 200 years. Instead, Barack Hussein Obama has interfered with federal bankruptcy proceedings, co-opted the legal rights of bondholders, and kowtowed to the labor unions that helped elect him. He fired the CEO and replaced the board of directors, then went on TV and told us he didn't want to run GM.

      Change we can believe in?

  5. getpaidtopost profile image39
    getpaidtopostposted 8 years ago

    They should have let GM fall down the endless pit and have done with them. The total 50 billion Dollars should have been split between the workers of GM, this would have given each worker around $300,000 each. Ok the tax payer would not gain from this, but will you gain from this now the us government has bought into it, I dont think so.

    I for one will never buy a GM car again, just to make a point.

  6. curiozities profile image60
    curiozitiesposted 8 years ago

    My next car will be a Ford.

    1. tony0724 profile image59
      tony0724posted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I,m with you !

      1. curiozities profile image60
        curiozitiesposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        And I used to love Mopars.  My ultimate dream car was once a '71 HemiCuda.  I currently drive a PT Cruiser and wanted to trade it in for a Dodge Challenger but after this disaster, screw GM and Chrysler.  If I want an American-made car I'll buy a Ford.  Or maybe even a Toyota.

    2. Laughing Mom profile image57
      Laughing Momposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I think we all better move a little closer to our jobs and buy really good bicycles.....

      1. tony0724 profile image59
        tony0724posted 8 years agoin reply to this

        I have my beach cruiser !

  7. tony0724 profile image59
    tony0724posted 8 years ago

    I had a Pontiac Firebird In my early 20s that I still miss !

    1. curiozities profile image60
      curiozitiesposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      My first car was a '69 Olds 442 I bought for $400.  My second car was a '74 Pontiac Grand Prix, also bought for $400.  I couldn't find a decent Mopar for that kind of money back then so I settled for GM.  I owned both cars in high school and they were pieces of junk but fast as heck and nothing sounds the way those big-block V-8 engines sounded when I punched it. 

      Ah, the memories...

  8. puppascott profile image76
    puppascottposted 8 years ago

    I just can't wait to see the first Viagra ad on the side of an electric, Nascar, stock car.

    1. curiozities profile image60
      curiozitiesposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      LMAO!  They might need to re-brand Viagra as "Jolt" to fit in with that type of advertising!

    2. Rochelle Frank profile image95
      Rochelle Frankposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Actualy I think it has already happened. Maybe they thought it would get them out in front.
      http://www.amazon.com/TEAM-CALIBER-MART … B001ODZCA0

  9. tony0724 profile image59
    tony0724posted 8 years ago

    My first car was a Dodge that was a piece of you know what ! But my friend had a license so he had to do the driving , our first big road trip was to see Jethro Tull at the coliseum In LA , aaaahhh the memories . We sure have lost our way In this country .

    1. curiozities profile image60
      curiozitiesposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Indeed we have.

  10. girly_girl09 profile image77
    girly_girl09posted 8 years ago

    I seriously almost cried the day I heard about the buyouts/bailouts. This whole situation is very sad for America. Unfortunately, some businesses don't do as well as others and the natural weeding out of businesses is ultimately healthier for the economy. Sort of like the strongest and fittest will survive.

    Government should never, EVER run businesses. One reason - it ultimately hurts the consumer. Think otherwise? Competition equals lower prices & better service.


    I love this example from my economics professor:

    Go to UPS (privately owned postal company) to mail a package. At noon, when it's break time, if there are people still in line, they'll assist you and you'll be on your way.

    Go to USPS( US Gov't run postal service) to mail a package. At noon, when it's break time, you'll have to wait in line forever while the shifts are switched and less postal workers are working.

    I've experienced this, it's so true. Privately owned businesses care about the consumer and they compete for your business. Without competition, our entire economic structure is severely threatened!

    I'm sorry it had to come to this, but I also realize that the economy is so damaged that drastic measures had to be taken. Time will tell if we did the right thing.

  11. countrywomen profile image35
    countrywomenposted 8 years ago

    Well to blame President Obama squarely when bailouts were initiated by President Bush seems unfairly partisan. Btw coming to the topic as a common tax payer what say do we have in these matters. smile

    1. tony0724 profile image59
      tony0724posted 8 years agoin reply to this

      None the Constitution Is being thrown by the wayside daily .

    2. puppascott profile image76
      puppascottposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I must have missed something. Who blamed Obama? My comment was aimed at our elected officials. I believe Bush was elected, too. I think you may have been looking for something that wasn't there.

      1. countrywomen profile image35
        countrywomenposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        Sir,

        In the past in another thread I have read your views about the so called justification for President Bush's Iraq invasion. And now in the above thread also it seemed that you were indicating that it could be President Obama's teams fault. Anyway, Can you please answer the below question which has been rephrased from your opening statement.

        When you say "Now they"(whom are you pointing about being in "Position" and "hasn't saved")?

        If I have wrongly understood your opening statement then I do apologize and beg for your forgiveness. smile

        1. puppascott profile image76
          puppascottposted 8 years agoin reply to this

          No apology is necessary. I don't know any other way of saying our government and elected officials. I have pointed my finger at all politicians involved with this debacle, former and current. That is the "They" I am referring to. Obama just happens to be the leader of the pack right now.

  12. HealthCare Basics profile image61
    HealthCare Basicsposted 8 years ago

    Apology, but who wants a GM??

  13. profile image0
    pgrundyposted 8 years ago

    I think GM will fail no matter how much money the government throws into it, and shortly after that, the U.S. will go belly up too.

    We are so screwed. It just hasn't hit people yet.

    It will though.

    1. Will Apse profile image92
      Will Apseposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      There are a lot of examples of companies in Europe who have pulled through bad times with government money and partial nationalisation.

      The question is could the US absorb the fallout of complete failure in the car making sector? The Obama Government thinks not.

      I personally have no answer but I think its not a time to be too ideological. Or overly pessimistic.

      There is plenty of productive capacity in the world for us all to be materially secure. The only issues are getting the finance sector back on track and making sure that production is long term, ecologically viable.

      1. profile image0
        pgrundyposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        I hope you are right.

        I don't see how GM can come back as anything near as large as what it once was. I live in Michigan so I'm in the thick of it. I know for sure it will be rough here for several years.

  14. countrywomen profile image35
    countrywomenposted 8 years ago

    Scott,
    Well now that I see you were trying to even include the previous elected team it seems to be a balanced perspective. I hope you do understand that I was misled by "now they" and didn't mean to assume without any reason. Yes, we have a huge problem and we ought to see by the end of President Obama's term if any progress will be made. I feel we are still in the early part of his tenure and should be realistic that there won't be any easy quick fix resolution(even if they are eventually resolved). Have a good day.smile

  15. fortunerep profile image83
    fortunerepposted 8 years ago

    I only had GM stock becuase my grandfather patented a part to use on the breaks for GM.  Although I don't know the entire story, I was left some shares many years ago.  I sold them two years ago for my boss said this was going to happen. 
    Dori

  16. puppascott profile image76
    puppascottposted 8 years ago

    I agree with all three of you. This has been a systemic shortcoming on both sides of the fence for a long time.

    Thanks for the input

  17. FreshtoDeath profile image54
    FreshtoDeathposted 8 years ago

    Ok, but why not? The government wheels and deals with businesses all the time. We have several agencies that exist just to regulate our industries. "Private" businesses have never been that private anyway.



    I don't think the 1/3rd collapse of an industry along with the permanent loss of those jobs is worth 300k a person.



    Last time I checked, there was still plenty of competition both from our own domestic auto industry as well as foreign industries. I wouldn't cry just yet.

  18. Dolores Monet profile image98
    Dolores Monetposted 8 years ago

    I sure don't want my tax dollars going to bail out a failing company. I start then to think, whoah, I am in agreement with the Republicans! But then I wonder, hmmm, didn't GM ask for money from the government?
    No company should exist whose failure can have such a drastic impact on US economy.

  19. bskinny profile image60
    bskinnyposted 8 years ago

    I dont see them coming back any time soon. ESPECIALLY since it appears that they are beholden to the government and will have to build cars that the government suggests rather than what the market demands. You can't create demand for something and if GM starts spitting out nothing but micromachine hotwheels (does anyone remember those?)that are the size of a lawnmower then nobody will buy their cars.

    I just don't understand why BUSH or OBAMA gave them bailout money when we knew they were going to go bankrupt anyway. Isn't there a phrase about throwing good money after bad or something like that?

    Too big to fail? Since when? If they aren't making cars people want or at a price people are willing to pay... THEN MAKE BETTER CARS AT BETTER PRICES. Why the hell do we have to bail out mediocrity and failure?

  20. trader7757 profile image45
    trader7757posted 8 years ago

    As a full time trader, I obviously track a lot of stocks, though I only trade derivatives.  The GM call was a difficult one for the administration, because of the massive production downline and suppliers that GM utilizes. 

    Of course, GM's problem has always been the same, an overwhelming attitude of arrogance toward the public.  They have been consistently behind the curve in developing new products that meet consumer demand.  For example, their new gambit, a cross over vehicle is being heavily touted, unfortunately the first crossovers came out five years ago and the market has already established distinct preferences for the existing vehicles.  GM is in the position of having to steal market share as opposed to establish market share.

    This is fairly typical of the GM mentality, especially when you consider the way they have staked much of their resources on their electric car, the Volt, which will cost 40K, at least.  During a recession, I don't see many individuals rushing out to buy a first year electric car at any price, let alone 40K.

    Anyway, the suppliers to GM were helped greatly by this bailout and hopefully some jobs were saved.  As for bailouts, I abhor them.

  21. puppascott profile image76
    puppascottposted 8 years ago

    It's not just what they are being told to make, it's what they're being told they shouldn't make; trucks and SUV's. These platforms have always been GM's bread and butter. I am all for alternative fuel vehicles, but GM is not going to make money on electric cars in the near future. We Americans are fickle about the cars we like, and drive, and it is going to take some getting used to a car that hums instead of rumbles.

    The other miracle that needs to happen is instantaneous infrastructure. We have no way of dealing with a great in-flux of electric and alternative fuel vehicles. Nobody seems to be addressing that issue. If your Prius or Insight breaks down in Cornfield County, Ks (for those of you from Kansas, substitute Nebraska)who is going to fix it for you? How, other than a dealer, is going to have the tools or capabilities to fix something they have never seen?

    Good luck, GM. You're going to need it.

 
working