|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Is it considered stealing if a art gallery visitor photographs a photo with their phone or camera?
Visitors to an art gallery can see many paintings, sculpture or photos but some like to photograph the images with their cell phones. They can print these later when they get home, so are they really stealing the work when they do this? This may be a form of the artists identity.
I think it is not legally considered stealing. If you check all the Public Domain and Creative Commons photes that are pictures taken of museum pieces, that tells me it is not illegal to do this.
Legally it's only stealing if a sign is clearly posted forbidding photos. I think artists need to be more protective of their work and don't be ashamed to require a gallery or museum to ban photos. Museums do have certain exhibits with these requirements while other areas of the museum are more lenient. An artist's work is personal and they should not feel forced to cheapen it or give it away.
Most galleries and museums post signs that prohibit photography, for a multitude of reasons. If the light is controlled in the exhibit space, it's hard to get a good shot without a flash, which is bad for most paintings, prints and photos. Most artists want to have some creative control over images of their work, and your crappy smartphone photo really doesn't do it justice. And yes, people do take photos in order to create prints---sometimes, not just for themselves. The artist, gallery, or museum may be selling prints, postcards, and books themselves, and they don't want people helping themselves to that work without paying.
Yes the museum wants to sell their souvenir gifts...but I was reading an article about artists work being copied and saw an image of a woman snapping a photo of a framed photo in a gallery and was incensed. As an artist I feel this is stealing.
Most who download music illegally aren't looking to sell it but that doesn't negate that it's stolen.
With law theft means you would be deprived of your art meaning no longer in possession. Taking a picture does not do that. Infringing on a copyright would be the next step to consider. That would consider reproduction of a work in some form without permission.
I don't think it's stealing in the sense of taking an object from a store,shop or a person or private property and keeping it or selling it on but it is a sort of intellectual theft.
If you took a photo without permission of the artist and made money from it or used it in a defamatory way you could potentially cross the red line I suppose, if someone took offence - the artist for example!
Some galleries have clear signage about their policy regarding photography and will actively discourage people from taking photos. This prohibition is usually on the insistence of the artist who perhaps has new material on display that they don't want seen outside of the display space.
Legally, not really, although if the person taking the picture decides to sell the pictures or make copies of the work without permission then I guess it's a breach of copyright.
Personally I don't think it's stealing and I see it as a form of documentation, but some artists choose to ban photography in any form because they feel it 'cheapens' the art. This is all up to personal interpretation, obviously.
by Kate Swanson9 years ago
A discussion started about this on the end of another thread, but it's got buried. I was checking an early Hub today and it reminded me, because I'd used a photo from another website. At that time, I didn't...
by Susannah Birch6 years ago
I'm aware that many people who have take their own photos and added them to hubs have been unhappy about the "No watermarks" rule on Hubpages.There is a simple way around this - that should both protect your...
by Earl S. Wynn7 years ago
If I were to start an art gallery, what should I do (or watch out for?)
by Wendy Hughes3 years ago
I know traffic is a problem everywhere it seems; I'm not talking about low traffic, here. There is a real problem if you use the photo capsule for anything and even the intro photo. I'm NOT referring to the images...
by Virginia Kearney2 years ago
Hi--I want to reorganize my photos in my HubPages albums and since only a few of the albums pop up when I want to use them, I'd like to delete some and rename others. Unfortunately, I can't find any information on...
by Poethepoet9 months ago
Do you feel the art of collecting actual photographs in photo albums has become a thing of the past?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.