I must admit, I was pretty excited when HP announed that they were going to pay people to hub hop on Amazon MTurk. The HITs don't pay much, only 5 cents a time, but you can make more money through bonuses, if you have a high accuracy rate.
It all went pretty well for me at first and with only a few minor setbacks, I managed to reach over 95% accuracy and a good bonus rate. But then it all went very crappy, and I sank and sank, despite me assessing hubs in what I though was the same fashion. Nowadays, I earn so little in bonuses, there isn't much incentive.
The problems are twofold, as far as I can see.
Firstly, there is very little feedback from HP, so it is difficult/impossible to know where you are going wrong. Yes, there are 4 basic examples to refer to, but that seems more than a little inadequate when you consider all the many different types of hub that people write and the different sorts of spammer tactics. (You do also get occasional one off feedback hubs too, but they aren't that helpful.
Secondly, as far as I am aware, the hopper's accuracy rate is assessed against what other hub hoppers have given. That means that you can assess something correctly but still be marked down (and you won't get any feedback, so won't know exactly where the problem occured). I consider myself pretty diligent, but it doesn't seem to help me.
I consider myself motivated and keen to learn, so am mystified as to why I am doing so badly at hopping after doing so well initially... Am I missing something?
And that is the problem in a nutshell! Majority vote-based quality control. However, most of the "voters" over at MT are people, who could not care less whether HP sinks or swims and, due to the pittance they are being paid, are probably gaming the system as much as possible, and thus using the simplest possible criteria to make their judgements.
Going by my rating experience when I was on Helium, it is not even necessary to read an article in order to rate it. I never read a word of what I was rating on Helium, yet managed to have a rating accuracy of 95% or higher most of the time, while needing only 10-15 seconds to make each rating decision.
If you are actually taking the trouble to read an article and assess it on the basis of content, I am not in the least surprised your ratings do not tally with those of the rest.
That is a concern, and I hope HubPages is paying attention. Your experience tells me there is something wrong with the way rating is judged - and if there's something wrong with the way rating is judged, that means some Hubs are being rated unfairly.
Paul, I'm sorry you're not getting the results you wanted.
But I have to say, my first reaction on reading your post was "Well, what did you expect?"
I think more will be achieved over the long term by expecting competence and being disappointed than by giving up entirely. At least for those of us still participating in this site.
I think HP should give more feedback on how they expect certain types of hub to be assessed. Otherwise, I just feel like I'm thrashing around in the dark. It's shocking how quickly your accuracy rate can go down. My bonus rate halved overnight.
We know it's not easy to rate Hubs accurately. There are multiple types of assessments. One thing to look out for is rating a spun/translated Hub highly. These Hubs can look really good at a glance, but the content is spun. Sometimes, when people go quickly, they don't pick up on the spun/translated content which impacts substance and grammar substantially.
You've highlighted an area that's difficult, Paul. More sophisticated spammers will produce something that's competent, in terms of grammar and appearance. However, there will often be a couple of links to commercial sites that imply that the page has been set up as purely a backlink/advert page. Are these to be marked with low grades? If we mark them with low grades, how do we know that other hub hoppers won't just glance at the page and mark them higher - then it looks like we've made a mistake? I do think that the current guidance, examples and feedback are too scant at present - certainly for me, at least. I want to follow whatever guidlines HP sees as necessary and identify where I am making mistakes, but would appreciate more detailed instructions...
Is it possible that we could have more of our previous 'mistakes' highlighted so that we can attempt to avoid them in future? I know that this already happens to a small degree, but for me it isn't enough.
If the accuracy score is based on simple agreement, it is also valid to point out that will make 100% "accuracy" impossible. And may depress your "accuracy" severely based on things not under your control.
Like EF already said, what did you expect? Yeah, sorry, Paul, but this thread is almost funny. Since it is our work that is being graded by this flawed system, however, it is not funny at all. It is downright infuriating.
Oh I read between the lines your implication that MTurk is for suckers who think $1 for two hours work is a great boon.
How do you know Paul is not living in a mud hut subsisting on a spoonful of rice a day? I'll have you know his MTurk earnings allowed him to generously adopt a family of rats this Chirstmas and upgrade his chamber pot to an empty Folger's can. I for one am very concerned that the downswing in MTurk will force Paul to make lifestyle adjustments that could cost him his engagement to a toothless bag lady he has been calling on of late. Let us pray for an MTurk miracle this season!
@tussin:
For some reason, I am reminded of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1wHxTyo
"In them days we were glad to have the price of a cup of tea. Without milk. Or sugar. Or tea."
I was satisfied with the income on the higher bonuses. A couple of hours a day for some extra cash. Not worth it when the bonus rate falls though.
HP probably has their MTurk assignment set up so that if you actually start to make decent money from the task, they pull the rug out from underneath you.
HP probably has their MTurk assignment set up so that if you actually start to make decent money from the task, they pull the rug out from underneath you.
My accuracy kept dropping until I wasn't allowed to do HP hits. They told me I was rating them different then they would when I asked. Ok, so then why are you paying people to do it if they get banned for not sharing your opinion? I did however make around 30 bucks before this happened.
All people have to do is file a complaint with MT Turk, and they may ban HP
Well, I certainly won't be complaining to Amazon. I am kind of hoping that HP will improve the hub hopping on MTurk, however. If not, I will drift off and do something else. I've just been a bit disappointed, that's all.
I'm disappointed that this is how our articles are being graded.
This is in reply to Write Angled,
I did the same thing for the short time I rated articles on Helium. I gave them several articles I worked really hard on. I thought the agreement was that they "owned" them for a year. Can I erase the URL can take them back, do you think? I thought it sounded good at first, but then realized I had to win a contest to make $1.00! And I got great reviews on crappy stuff too.
Question: Would the fact that HP pay for views via MTurk look suspicious to Google? Might it be the reason for the latest traffic drop?
S'cuse if that's a stupid question but being in the UK, I have no idea how MTurk works.
That is an interesting point. It could well be seen as an attempt to artificially inflate the US viewing figures. I wonder how bad the recent fall in traffic actually is when you take out the MTurk visitors.
I find it difficult to see how a few hundred daily visits to unpublished hubs would have any significant effect. But who knows?
Is it only a few hundred? I guess 300 a day = 2,100 a week = 8,400 a month = minimal input, so not a big deal if that is the case.
Now this rating is open to all non-US MTurkers as well. So, the visits will be from all over the world now!
You cannot remove your articles from Helium.
I am sorely tempted to set up a website simply to reproduce all my Helium articles and then try to get the ones on my site higher in the SERPS than the ones at Helium!
I wonder if the new rule that only people in the USA can work on MT derives from the fact that this is the population who are willing to accept the lowest rates for the job, as shown in this experiment:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 … -hour.html
I see that the hub examples on MTurk have more detail now. I will carry on for now and see if I can raise my accuracy level. Earnings are reasonable when accuracy is 90 something percent. But when it falls, it starts becoming less worth it.
I understand that there will never be a perfect system, by the way. I just think there is room for more tweaking. Improving accuracy improves things for everyone.
You have some patience, Paul. The clutter of nonsense you have risen above in this thread (including some of the nastiest posts I have ever seen) should get you reincarnated as a luminous light being of infinite wisdom. Well, that is assuming that any of the stuff my wife believes is actually true.
I'm not seeing much in the way of nastiness on this thread. Certainly none directed at the OP.
As far as my posting here goes, I'm glad Paul is reporting the problems he's encountering on MTurk. These are things we need to know. I'm not upset with Paul, I'm upset that our hubs are being graded in a way that leaves so much room for inaccuracy, and by people who likely are not qualified. I'd be relieved to learn that Paul is grading my hubs, but I have a feeling he is the very cream of the crop there at MTurk, and those with his qualifications are few and far between.
To be brutally honest, I think some people who are commenting in this thread don't really have any experience of hubhopping at MTurk and don't understand the bonus system - it is very clear from some of the comments. My main purpose of opening the thread was to give some constructive criticism to the folks at HP. I was also interested to see if there were any other hubbers in the forums who were turking and hear their experiences.
So those who do not even have a handle on spoken English, let alone the written English is going to judge hubs on MTurk. What a bad joke that is. HP has the Hub Hopper, guess that isn't good enough, I wonder if the pay they pay out to MTurk is going to affect earnings here.
So those who do not even have a handle on spoken English, let alone the written English is going to judge hubs on MTurk. What a bad joke that is. HP has the Hub Hopper, guess that isn't good enough, I wonder if the pay they pay out to MTurk is going to affect earnings here.
by backporchstories 11 years ago
Do you like the new hub hopping?What I do like about the new hub hopping is they way you can rate grammar separately from creativity. What I do not like, is we are forced to read a hub we have no interest in. It seems we can not hop forward without rating a hub. This will...
by Paul Edmondson 10 years ago
We first launched the new Hub Hopper in early August http://blog.hubpages.com/2012/08/hub-ho … o-feature/ We are looking to increase the amount of Hub Hopping and last night deployed an application to Mechanical Turk to find more people to Hop Hubs. For those that are good at it, there...
by Faith Reaper 10 years ago
What does everyone think of the new "Hub Hopping" process?Maybe, it's just me, but it is a little frustrating, and it was fun, but now? Not so sure about it. I may just need to adjust to it and keep at it before I make any final conclusions.
by Robert P 8 years ago
I have been hub hopping lately and I am disgusted with the incoherent garbage that I am coming across - nothing but poorly translated articles of about 400 words, usually without even any formatting. I would say that more than half of the articles I randomly encounter are clearly nothing but spun...
by KevinC9998 11 years ago
Do you like the new Hopper?I do not like it since your must rate a hub before moving on. I usually just like to hop around and selectively read the hubs that catch my attention.
by Mikeydoes 12 years ago
In light of the Google algo change, it is now obvious and confirmed that hub-hopping is VERY important. I feel that if you publish here, you should hub hop when you can. As it should hopefully increase our revenue and hopefully take this hubpages back to the top, where it belongs.The problem is...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |