So I had a lot to say on this hub and it came in at just around 6,000 words. I'm not sure whether it might be worth splitting up into three parts or something to make it a little more accessible? It's just a topic I happen to be passionate about!!!
Also, I know my titles are not really search engine friendly and rather obscure, but I was hoping to liven the tone of the piece. What are your thoughts on if I went with more traditional/safe SEO type titles?
Really appreciate any feedback I can get, this took a long time to put together!
I thought that 6000 words would be far too many for a hub, but on reading it, I found that not to be the case at all. It's packed full of useful information and written in a style that keeps the reader engaged. It's perhaps too long to read and take in all in one go, but as a Twitter reference, it's excellent and should keep readers coming back again and again.
As was mentioned, splitting it into separate hubs might make more sense as far as attracting traffic is concerned, but as a reader, I'm glad that it's all in one hub. I can scan and pick and choose the parts I want to read or re-read. I would be less likely to click on links.
Fix the mistakes that have been pointed out (surprisingly few for a 6,000 word article) and this hub will fly.
I think it would be worth splitting into three separate Hubs. That way you get three different Hubs that can be found by the search engines. Interlink them clearly and people will read all three.
An obvious split would be to move the "Twitter Jargon" section into a separate Hub. Then create a right-floated, coloured text box saying something like "Confused by Twitter jargon? Find out what it all means here (linking to your jargon Hub)". I'd put that around the middle of the Hub.
This is a great hub full of interesting tid bits. I would break up the paragraphs into smaller units to make it less cumbersome for readers. Apart from that it is a good piece.
thanks Luis, really appreciate the feedback. I'll be sure to make some tweaks to the paragraph structure
Would anyone else be so kind as to take a look? Thanks folks
These are some changes I'd suggest in addition to LuisE...:
1. Place your keyword at the front of the title~Twitter Marketing:Mega......However note Mega Monster guide comes up as zero people searching for that keyword, so really there is no advantage for using it maybe try a title like this:
Twitter Marketing: Using Twitter for Marketing Guide
2. Use a table of contents
3. Start your first paragraph using more focus terms. (guide to twitter, twitter marketing, marketing using twitter, ect.)
4. Think about turning this into more than one hub. Twitter demystified can be its own hub. Titled: Twitter: How to use Twitter and Twitter: How to understand Twitter Jargon.
5. Then link all these hubs together.
Some really great tips there, thank you summerberrie. Guess I missed a lot of SEO work here focusing on the content!
dj2ball, you have lots more views than I do and with only 2 hubs so I suspect I could learn more from you than you from me. Best of hubbing
Well I got all those views on one hub pretty much, got in early on a new game release and was ranking top 5 in Google for quite some time...now to get this one up there too!
One small point, Summerberrie: in your suggested title you've used "Twitter" twice and "Marketing" twice - a title which would've been a great idea at one time, but is now a no-no.
it's thought that Google is now punishing repeated keywords in a title because it's a common strategy by keyword stuffers.
Here are some corrections on the first paragraph.
Welcome and congratulations on finding this hub, not to mention getting past it's* ever so slightly obnoxious title! My intention for this hub is to be something of an all encompassing twitter resource for both* new users, as well as those that have dabbled in but never fully made use of it. You can expect to* me to take you by the hand and lead you slowly and steadily through the sometimes bafflingly* complex world of Twitter and its application as a marketing tool.
* "it's" should be "its"
* Either take "both" out or replace "as well as" with "and"
* Take the "to" out
* Baffling should be the correct word
Looks like you might have made many more errors, seeing it is 6000 words long. If you don't mind I could copy-edit it for errors.
That would be great, appreciate you taking the time to help.
6000 words was a lot to write and my fingers and mind were occassionally moving along separate paths!
Looking further at it, it looks like you need to correct all the way through. There are repetitions of the error of using "it's" instead of "it". I also found errors with tenses.
I would suggest that you go through the hub again to correct mistakes. I know it is no easy task but you can do it step by step, 1000 words at a time or so. It is important to correct it so that it flows well. Writing hurriedly shouldn't mean you have to make mistakes.
I found the hub to be informative. I have published 10 hubs to date and all 10 of them are featured hubs. However, my readership seems to be disappointingly low, although many people have advised me to go professional and approach outdoors exploration magazines for publishing the hubs. The lessons learnt from my 10 featured hubs and some friends who really do care are as follows:
1. Hubs should be of moderate length.
2. Long paragraphs should be broken into shorter easy to read ones. You do have very long paragraphs.
3. Put lots of pictures, figures, graphs, illustrations, preferably original ones along those paragraphs.
Then you do what you are advising others to do - market it.
Looks like a very useful hub. You made good use of text capsules for the last half of the hub but not the first half. Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like you put a lot of content into a few text capsules in the first half of the hub. I counted 14 text capsules but you could probably use 18 to 20 for the entire hub. Also, as Luis said, break up your paragraphs into smaller ones.
I'm still not clear on what constitutes "overly self-promotional" but you put your twitter account and link to your site at the bottom. Not sure if that's too much as far as Hubpages is concerned.
Otherwise, good job, that's a lot of work.
My main suggestion is to take path-finder's suggestions which don't seem to have been done in the 8 days since he posted them:-)
Secondly I think your title will appeal to people who already use twitter. In which case you can get rid of the instructions on how to sign up to twitter, thus reducing your massive word-count.
And to re-iterate other people's suggestions - chop up the large blocks of text.
Good stuff though overall:-)
I have to be honest - my eyes sort of glazed over when I saw the lack of effective formatting and the excessive length. On the web, about 1500 words is fairly long for a page.
I would break this up into several related articles - but each should be stand alone. Avoid doing articles as "page 1", "page 2" etc
Also improve the readability of the page by breaking it up into components that can be easily be scanned and read
I scanned it without really reading to get a feel. And I was interested in someone who had so many views with only two hubs!
I like your writing style - ignore the grammar police. You do slightly convoluted sentences, my big failing, so you might want to occasionally simplify your statements - but I like it.
IF I was interested in Twitter I would have read it all. It feels like a proper in-depth article.
The only thing I really don't like is the use of the word "hub". It means nothing to anyone. Use page or article or anything but.
HOTD right there in my opinion.
Thanks everyone for all the tips, as soon as I get some time in the next few days ill look to tidy up the grammar errors, break up the chunks of text and make a call if I split the hub into a few smaller ones
by northweststarr6 years ago
A common problem for all writers, taking other peoples' suggestions and criticisms gracefully is essential to the process. I personally, welcome any and all advice from my readers that is constructive and true. I find...
by LegendaryN86 years ago
I put this in the "answers" section and it actually should've been posted here.Many of us may be not performing to our fullest potential because we haven't taken a critical eye to each others' content. I...
by Orderly Confusion6 years ago
Is there a reason why hubbers do not accept constructive criticism and/or corrections? Am I the only grown-up on this site who takes corrections as a means of making my hubs better and myself informed? I, not wanting to...
by Garrett Mickley7 years ago
Today I posted a comment on a hub that confused me. I'm curious if I'm in the wrong here. I was confused by a section of the hub and I said:Why does it say "We sent New York journalist Sam Merrill (whose...
by elanger3335 years ago
Hi!This is my first article and its pretty much a rough overview of acupuncture. I am thinking its a little bit short and I should probably add a picture. But I would very much appreciate any criticism, especially...
by Mirmana4 years ago
Hello all! I am 'new' (signed up a long time ago, but just started writing) to Hubpages and very excited to start covering as many subjects as possible. However, I've always been very reliant of feedback in order to...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.