I established Groups and moved my existing (completed) hubs into appropriate groups. I understand that some of my hubs will show at the bottom of the screen for a hub from the same group. However, I believe that categorizing hubs into groups with the same or similar theme/overall topic ON THE PROFILE SCREEN would be very helpful to readers who are interested in reading all of a HP member's hubs in that group. They would be easier to find.
A link after the few hubs from a group showing at the screen bottom could lead a reader to the author's profile screen, where he or she could easily find more hubs of interest in the same topic area.
I seem to have read something about this before--either that HP administration WAS considering it or was NOT.
At any rate, I believe it would be helpful--more so than the few hubs featured (with those of other hubbers) on a hub screen near the end of the page. Does anyone else agree with me? If so, I'd I hope you will speak out (or "write out", to be accurate).
At first glance, I thought it was a great idea-- especially for those of us who write about many subject/categories.
I still think it is not bad-- but if you have many hubs on a particular subject, people may think that is ALL you write about, when they visit the top part of your profile list.
So, ultimately, I think having your related hubs shown below a hub being viewed is probably best.
They used to do it that way, and I really liked it. There were some issues though - since I wrote on a lot of different topics, there was only room for a few topics, and HubPages would choose which topics to feature. These topics wouldn't always be the best for the season. Also they chose a few hubs as teasers to get more info about the topic, and sometimes I wanted to feature a different hub (because it was new or didn't get enough views, etc.)
Just so you know, there is a way for your readers to find your hubs by topic. On the profile page, below the carousel, above the list of hubs, there is an arrow that says "Show all". If your reader clicks on the arrow, they get a drop down menu that lets them select a topic. It is hard to find though and not intuitive that it does anything.
We have had this feature requested recently and determined not to change the way categories display on the profile at this time.
If you click the "Show: All" under the Spotlight section on a profile, you can select the specific category to display from the list.
Once I select a specific category to display from the list, "All" no longer applies, and my other hubs are not shown. So I will not be doing this. Can you tell me WHY you determined not to change the way categories display on the profile screen after having the feature requested? I suppose you could consider my remarks another request. I still don't think it's efficient not to separate ALL hubs on the profile screen by groups/categories. I've been around long enough to remember what it was like when they were displayed that way, and it was much better--like an index. How does it hurt HP to display them that way?
Well, this isn't the first time I've disagreed with a HP administrative decision and probably won't be the last. I do wish HP gave members the opportunity to understand the logic behind administrative decisions (explanations). If I knew the WHY for some change or policy, I might not gripe about it.
Thanks for your response, anyway.
Hubs used to be shown in groups on the profile page, but it was changed quite a while ago.
If your hubs are grouped, and linked together within the text, readers will more easily be able to click on to another similar topic rather than be led back to the profile page. If they really want to read more of an author, most will simply click on the author avatar/link.
Am I alone in thinking that having hubs grouped by category on the Profile screen is more efficient and effective for someone visiting that screen than to have a hodgepodge list? Also, if I have six hubs that are very similar to a new hub, having to add six links is troublesome, whereas, a link to a group name (which would have all hubs within that group) would be more efficient...in my opinion...obviously not that of HP.
Given that it used to be that way and then that feature was dismantled... Quite possibly yes.
And it's not hodgepodge, it's based on what you've created most recently or updated.
You don't need to add all six links to the new hub. You can use 2-3 textual links to keep your reader linking to other related hubs, in which you do the same (with different related links). You can use one central hub (theme) to link your hubs together. It can boost not just one page in ranking, but can boost others as well. Perhaps a small percentage of readers will click on to read more, but those views can be beneficial if the reader decides to share a link. We want quality, relevant links pointing to our hubs.
This is the first i've heard(seen) about groups?
Anychance someone has an explanation of what they are or how to use it? or maybe a link to an explanation?
Seems like an interesting concept, is it a way of linking your own hubs together or do you link it with other hubbers?
You group your own hubs together on the accounts page
(you can also group each individual hub)
http://hubpages.com/learningcenter/usin … d_22634286
When you group your hubs, they show up as links on the bottom of the hub. They show up in order, so the hub above the current hub in the group is shown on the left and the hub below the current hub in the group is shown on the right.
I checked some of the hubs in one of my groups, and at the bottom of each, there are two links for other hubs I've placed in the group--the previous and the next one published. Below those two links is a box with links to hubs about similar topics published by other people on HP.
My thinking is that if I have six hubs in a group, all six links should be visible either grouped together on my profile screen or at the bottom of each hub in that group. I am obviously looking at this issue from my own perspective and not that of HubPages administration. And apparently no one else agrees with me. Haha!
I like the groups because they link all of your relevent articles together, for one it helps keep the readers with you and for two it is good because Google likes that
by Liz Elias 8 years ago
Hi- I've been unable to find the answer to this. Maybe it's already answered, but unfortunately, I don't have hours available to sort through thousands of posts searching. In creating "groups," I have sorted all my items, but it would be really nice if when viewing the...
by Marina 3 years ago
Hi everyone! Today we released an update to the Hub Groups interface in My Account. The new interface closely matches the About the Author UI and should be familiar to many of you. Please note that we did not make any functional changes to Hub Groups (such as integrating it with About the Author)...
by Lorelei Cohen 2 years ago
I have seen a few mentions of putting our articles into groups but when I went to put in a heading I found myself stopping because I wasn't sure what to put there. Do we go broad categories ie: foodie:healthOr use keywords for each group title.ie: food: recipes, cooking, preserving Or niche...
by Kim Kennedy 5 years ago
It would be useful to be able to sort our hubs into categories on the profile page. This would make it easier for readers to see what else is available in subjects that interest them, and also remind writers to work on a niche. I think the option was available on the old profile page - was it...
by Tessa Schlesinger 6 months ago
Long time ago, we could put our hubs into categories. I can't find anything for that anymore.Can I write a hub that briefly details my ideas about business and capitalism and then link it to all my hubs in that category?I think I'm done with wrting about business and capitalism. They never do that...
by Phyllis Doyle Burns 3 years ago
I fail to see the need for the "related hub" section on each of my hub pages. Sometimes these hubs do not really relate to mine. Readers come to our pages to read the hubs we wrote or because they like to follow us. Pulling our readers away to other hubs is not quite fair.There are...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|