This provides a useful insight into Panda 4.1. => http://moz.com/blog/panda-4-1
Some key points
=> Panda is a site-wide penalty
" It is also worth pointing out here that there is no positive Panda algorithm to our knowledge. Sites that perform well on Panda do not see boosts because they are being given ranking preference by Google, rather their competitors have seen rankings loss or their own previous Panda penalties have been lifted. In either scenario, we should remember that performing well on Panda assessments isn't going to necessarily increase your rankings, but it should help you sustain them."
=>Most significant differences between winners and losers
# This content could be in Print
# Page written by experts
# Insightful analysis
# Content Trustworthy
# Original Content
# I would consider this site an Authority on the topic
# Page worth bookmarking
# No errors
# Low ads
The first two sets (high and moderate), are the most difficult to address particularly for a site like HP, because they relate to authority, depth of analysis, trustworthiness and originality, as well as good design, high quality content.
The extent to which Panda is applied to Subdomains, as well as to the host domain, is also an issue.
Yes, thanks for the insight, janderson99. Do you think the penalty this site is under will be lifted, based on your experience?
The best we can hope for is a review with the next panda update. My prediction is that HP's traffic will remain what it is now (1M US pageviews) for the time being, despite the huge increase in pages.
In spite of the 175,000 pages of new content added from Squidoo, yesterday's HP traffic was exactly what it was a year ago on October 13, 2013.
My prediction is that HP traffic will fall even further when the Google-announced Penguin algorithm is released (due momentarily). I strongly suggest that everyone put NoFollow tags on all affiliate links, advertising links and links unrelated to Hub content (like in photo credits). I also suggest that you add followed outbound links to good related reference info on other webpages (not Wikipedia and not just other Hubs on HubPages).
I suggest that you remove links to your other Hubs which are not specifically related to your Hub's topic. Further, check your keyword phrase density (different from keyword density), comments for spam wording (bad English, etc.) and links. Make sure all ads and affiliate marketing "adds significant value" to your users and are directly relevant to your Hub content. Finally, check your Hubs for broken links and suspicious backlinks.
How do we know if it is a suspicious backlink?
I read this on moz a few days ago and posted the link in another Panda related thread. It probably got lost in the thread. I thought his overall analysis of the winners and losers was interesting in that it appears that the losers at their best were still below the winners at their worst. He also links to another helpful page at the end of his article that's worth reading in regard to Panda. It goes over the Google high quality Do list and low quality Don't list.
by bigmikeh8 years ago
I discovered RedGage a few days ago. You can post photos, documents, videos and links on the site, and get paid for doing so. Only cents, but to get paid to post links to hubs or sites is novel. So I now have several...
by chet thomas3 years ago
After reading the other forums on copied hubs, I ran a check on several of mine. I found two at:http://the-alps (dot) us/and I suspect there are lots of other hubbers' hubs there. A quick search found a hub by Admiral...
by Jean Bakula6 years ago
This site has been suggested as a way to get traffic. I spent a few hours, which turned into 3 days, to figure out how to navigate it. It appears to be a site about links, not really content, but they get angry if you...
by yols-a5 years ago
I am newbie alot things seem like a foreign language to me
by God is in kitchn24 years ago
The 'related searches' ads issue has reached its boiling point. I think I will be very wrong if I guess that HP staffs, or CEO have not recently seen any of the foum threads which circled around the RS ads issue. Don't...
by Eugene Brennan3 weeks ago
I've had links to my own related hubs snipped on several occasions (mostly blatant lists at the end of a hub), but some links have been left in place after several snips. So is it acceptable to include a link to a hub...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.