Can this Hub be salvaged?
It was a Squidoo lens, with an angle for making money and so I made it with a sharing theme.
It was featured before, but now after some manual hits by Google it has the white circle.
I can move it but I am now feeling remorse about dwindling my biggest account.
Any opinions or discussions, is it a perfect example of a no-no?
http://paperfacets.hubpages.com/hub/unr … collection
Why are pumpkins used for Halloween? Where did the Jack-o-lantern originate and what did it look like? Why would you buy a paper-mache pumpkin rather than a real one? Who makes the most valuable collector pumpkins? Why are they special? Why would I even bother with a pumpkin anyway, of any sort? Why are ceramic pumpkins collectible? How collectible are they? Why did you choose the products you chose? Why are they special?
What can your hub offer in information that makes it more valuable than a simple ebay/amazon search?
Just some ideas
Melissa, wow all those ideas are stellar. This helps a lot. I like the images from my afternoon session and am reluctant to give up the Hub. It is true I really do not feel tons of passion for collecting pumpkins, but I can elaborate a bit more an our neighborhood pumpkins being smashed.
Maybe even the merits of decorating for the Holidays.
You are help. Thanks.
I think you are misinterpreting Paul Edmonson's post. Your Hub has not had "manual hits" from Google, and neither have any other Squidoo lenses. He merely used that as an example of what can happen sometimes, if Hubs don't meet certain standards.
Your Hub was hit by a HubPages internal filter, that's all. The reason is that you have three Amazon and eBay capsules all bunched together, with no strong reason why those products are the best for your reader.
I suggest deleting all three of those capsules. I would suggest adding a new Amazon capsule in the "glass pumpkin" section, showing a glass pumpkin - that's much more likely to make a sale than posting random products.
You could certainly add some of Melissa's great ideas but they are not necessary to get your Hub Featured again.
I'm not sure the hub would pass QAP with just removing the capsules and adding the glass pumpkin capsule. It's still kind of lacking in substance. (no offense intended at all). So it might go through on the new rules, but not pass the standard QAP. I would say it's borderline as is... Just an opinion though, and you know what everyone says about those
um.. i am not familiar with the stories of pumpkins because in malaysia we just eat them, don't display or decorate them. If your hub did well in squidoo but became a circle here, that means, you need to change the title and contents to attract views
I think she meant that as a result of the two recent manual slaps on two subdomains and the subsequent action taken by HP on the site as a whole she received a white circle violation. Paul didn't specify but he very much said that recently two subdomains were hit with a manual slap. Recently, Google put a manual action on a couple of subdomains for pure spam. We analyzed the accounts.
In light of that, I like some of Melissa's suggestions. You could expand on the text and make your subheadings keyword phrase related. You could even use some of her questions (or similar) as subheadings. I would probably only include two products that relate directly to the surrounding content.
Thanks much. I did make some changes but I need to have morning coffee to get more creative writing in. It still needs more engagement.
I think the engagement issue is down to your title choice. I had no idea what the phrase "unreal pumpkins" meant (I'm in the UK). I thought it might be a US term but when I did a search on google.com it doesn't seem to have the same understanding of the term as you do either.... and that will be because searchers aren't using it to find artificial pumpkins.
I would definitely rework the title/keywords.
I liked this hub. I thought the images were very pretty. But the title is off, the word "unreal" doesn't work. Why don't you try a new title? How about adding content including a description of the different artificial pumpkins that you have featured. I like the one made of twigs. Did you ever make one yourself? You could add a bit on how to make one. I think this one is an easy fix!
Honestly, I do agree with you all of you on the title. Unreal was not working in I head, but I truly ignored that thought. Thanks for bringing it to the front and center. I think I was trying to be clever; 'unreal' referring to something scary for Halloween. hahah
That goes to show, I secretly know what is required but laziness or ignoring, or being stubborn intellectually, creates some of my own problems.
When I first saw the title, that word jumped out at me also. I wasn't clear on what it meant until I read the hub. I thought perhaps that's what crafty people call them. I love how you have been so open and receptive to suggestions. Let us know when you've reworked it, so we can take a look.
This morning the Hub was okay and score was 74. It was 62 or something before.
It ended up in example where deleting amazon and ebay helped because I only did minor writing changes and ended up with less word count.
Now I have to work on the keywords.
Hey, I have to say I am enjoying this pick-apart the Hub. Coffee is working and I did a few Google searches. "unreal pumpkin" gets 409,000 results and "artificial pumpkin" gets 457,000.
Under unreal my intro photo does come up under images in the first scroll, I saw nothing under web.
I narrowed my webMaster tools to the month of Oct. and I only got one impression for "pumpkin collection."
So now I know why I got zero views.
Unreal, I remember now, is in the US like saying "awesome." Huffington had a post for Unreal Eats.
But also my target audience is home decor people. Those people are probably not the ones who search unreal.
The score for the unreal pumpkin hub is now 82. I will declare our work a success. Now I can wait 10 months and see how it does for Fall 2015. In the summer I will make sure all my promotion options are done. I may even blog about pumpkins which I only do sporadically.
Thank you everyone for your help.
Good for you! You took suggestions, positive action and moved forward. Thanks for letting us know.
by Writer Fox 5 years ago
In reading the forum post from two years ago when all Hub URLs were changed to Subdomains, many people reported that copied Hubs began to outrank theirs when the change was made. I think this might happen again and we have five forum threads going right now about copied content. Be sure to do...
by Paul Goodman 7 years ago
Article for discussion. I know that this recent development has already been mentioned by some hubbers in forums. But I am now wondering if this might be the main reason why we are seeing the current traffic plunges for many hubbers? See link...
by Silver Rose 7 years ago
Here's a post from googlewebmastercentral posted yesterday:http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot. … ernal.htmlLook at the table where they show the differences. Previously scholar.google.com/ and sketchup.google.com/ were external links, now they are internal links.It's probably a response...
by Will Apse 5 years ago
In his hub 'What We Don't Know About Google Panda?', Paul Edmondson points out that Google seems to expect sites to leap high above any bar that might reasonably be set for quality purposes.Paul seems less than happy with Google's attitude. He seems to think that if a page can somehow limp over...
by juliebooly 7 years ago
Hi all,I had the number one page rank for one of my hubs, and now the page seems to have completely disappeared - even when I do the search using my tag (juliebooly). Can anyone explain why Google would have removed it? I'd like to get my rank back .Thanks!juliebooly
by Andrew Orrell 2 years ago
So in the past 6 months we have all endured a real rollercoaster ride thanks to the big G. Many of us are still really struggling while some of us have reached new heights with our page views. I am happy to say I am in the second group of people, my views are better than they have ever...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|