One Long Hub or Several Short Hubs on the Same Topic?

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (17 posts)
  1. Billie Kelpin profile image85
    Billie Kelpinposted 4 years ago

    Is it better to make one large hub that covers all aspects of your topic or to separate those several aspects on a topic into two or three hubs.  I'm wondering how this plays out in terms of each of the following:
    Reader Interest and attention span
    Editor's Choice possibility
    Number of readers

    Maybe making text images as a slide show would work or how about a PowerPoint Presentation inside a hub.  I wonder if that's possible.  I know I could link to an outside presentation, but don't want to waste my outside links. 

    How do you handle large amounts of information on a topic. 

    Thanks all.



    1. profile image0
      calculus-geometryposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      How long would the hub be (number of words) if you presented all the information in a single hub?

      1. Billie Kelpin profile image85
        Billie Kelpinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Ah Ha! someone with the name Calculus-Geometry WOULD make me look at the most logical aspect - the number of words smile !  I have about 780 now and could probably double that or at least at 300 more.  Too long?

        1. sallybea profile image98
          sallybeaposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          In my humble opinion, just right.

        2. profile image0
          calculus-geometryposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          That's a good length, no need to break it up. I thought you were going to say 7000 words or something. smile

    2. Writer Fox profile image48
      Writer Foxposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Search engines like comprehensive answers.  I'd go with making one long Hub.  Some of my best Hubs for traffic are over 7,000 words.

    3. Marisa Wright profile image94
      Marisa Wrightposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      As WF says, search engines like comprehensive answers, but I'm not sure whether that means you MUST put the whole answer in one Hub.   We had another internet guru here called Sunforged (he's gone on to bigger and better things now) -- he did some experiments and he felt that writing a series of interlinked Hubs did just as well, if not better than, one very long Hub. 

      The trick is to use a Table of Contents and make the interlinking between the Hubs clear, and to make each Hub work as a stand-alone as well as being part of the series (i.e. don't just start writing and say "next I'll talk about..." - look at your subject and work out how you can make each Hub cover a different aspect).

      1. Writer Fox profile image48
        Writer Foxposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        He's still on this site; he just hasn't updated anything in two years and is down to 61 featured Hubs.  The advice you are referencing was from before the first Panda hit in 2 011.  It doesn't relate to today's reality.

    4. UnnamedHarald profile image94
      UnnamedHaraldposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      You might also consider the "NEED SOME GOALS" graphic that appears in the upper right when editing your hub. It graphically shows that the longer the hub the more traffic it might attract. It's just a guideline of course, and no guarantee. I'd just say this: if your hub is well-written and, say 1200 words, the word count is likely in your favor.

  2. Gia Moroe profile image71
    Gia Moroeposted 4 years ago

    Keeping it in seems like a good length to me. 780 seems a tad short.

    1. Marcy Goodfleisch profile image94
      Marcy Goodfleischposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I agree with Gia, as well as the other good tips here.  780 is short, and as Joshua (sunforged) points out, more comprehensive content gets more of Google's attention. 

      Joshua - good to see you!  We miss you!

  3. seraphic profile image73
    seraphicposted 4 years ago

    I seem to average 1800 words per article now... is that too long?

  4. FatFreddysCat profile image96
    FatFreddysCatposted 4 years ago

    I just published one today that was 1500 words and change, which appears to be about the norm for me.

  5. LeanMan profile image87
    LeanManposted 4 years ago

    I write interlinked hubs on a subject; but then individual hubs are typically 1500+ words in length also. A significant number of my page views come from people that click from one hub on a subject to another. Each hub tends to have traffic that is attracted by its own set of keywords.

    So I would say break a subject up; but only if it is going to be going into the several thousands of words - a hub of only 1000-1500 words is not worth splitting up.

  6. CuAllaidh profile image82
    CuAllaidhposted 4 years ago

    More than anything it depends on your subject. I write a series of medieval game related hubs, they are related and I have kind of a table of contents type hub which link them all, but they are separate. Then I have several that I wrote as one long subject because it was a subject that worked better as a long artticle vs. a bunch of small articles. Examine your topic, is it logical to split it up into smaller topics or to write one longer one. As others have stated though a hub is only long once it goes over 1500 words, less than that and it's fairly short.

  7. sunforged profile image66
    sunforgedposted 4 years ago

    I don't feel this type of question is specific to Hubpages.

    If you look into studies (or your own data) on content length as it effects SERP's - you will often see reports along the line of when analyzing top ten results we found that pages with 1500+, 2450+ words consistently held top positions.

    More words, more opportunities for long tails, more food for the search engines to feed off.

    I did/do - appreciate a method of utilizing multiple pieces of relevant copy and linking them together, but the reasoning was more than strict ranking, it is also a collection tool.

    My primary headlines/titles are likely to dominate why/what I rank for, so I will take a similar piece of subject matter and write variations, different voices, keyword focus, reading level, perhaps a bit antagonistic, one a bit encyclopedic - whatever.

    This creates a net that helps me discover terms that are performing well or have lesser competition that I may have not discovered through keyword research but are usually easy to develop since I'm already familiar with the subject matter. In fact, I find that part to be fun.

    I don't know how current HubMetrics are influenced or of what value they have to performing in the wild or making an income,

    But these terms taken at face value:

    Reader Interest and attention span

    Web readers are always scanners, we usually find that the format of the text influences how long they choose to read over length eg "avoid wall of text" which is something the Hub format diverts most people from doing anyway


    Internal metric - no comment

    Editor's Choice possibility

    Internal metric - no comment

    Number of readers

    Multiple pieces of content provide multiple funnel openings, quantity will eventually win out as long as your minimum standards are still better than most.

    @Writer Fox - I'm not still around, just have old alerts in place that bring me back from time to time, I think its been at least a year.

    Hi everyone!

    1. viryabo profile image94
      viryaboposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Hello Sunforged. It's so good to see you around here, albeit briefly.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)