The Global Pageviews data from Quantcast confirms that the traffic loss reported by Paul E has been locked in. There is a new "Quota" about 15% lower than that which applied for most of 2015. I call it a 'Quota' - you can call a 'sustained traffic trend' or whatever you like, but the sustained traffic trend is a reality.
It is interesting that Online views (PCs) is declining, especially for US pageviews, but mobile traffic is up. I would suggest that HP 'bites the bullet' and makes a radical move to a 'responsive, designed for mobile first,' layout as a proactive move for the future. Maybe Stella is a dinosaur in the mobile age! Down scope!
This latest loss-of-traffic phase is a direct result of the HP Design Changes made on May 4th:
Nope, I disagree. Google penalties for various reasons -manual notices, 'quality' stuff (=> "quota" drop) is much more plausible, a la Paul E's hub. Where is the evidence that HP design changes caused the traffic to decline? I think the changes were an improvement. The drop started in Mid May. Also, HP should have got a surge from being mobile friendly (perhaps that explains why mobile is up). Look at the longer term pattern IMO.
I thought HP had already done this! Have I been sleeping under a rock or something?
If you are referring to "mobile first" design. The answer is no. HP has a mobile rendering layout as well as a PC layout, but they are different and separate. A 'mobile first' design addresses the reality that mobiles are taking over. It is designed for mobiles FIRST and renders responsively on PCs and ALL screen sizes. Layout for mobiles is fundamentally simpler and delivers what people want simply and quickly on small screens. medium (dot) com started the trend and AOL have gone the same way (see below). ONE design fits ALL = designed FOR mobiles - not as a mobile add-on. Imagine a single column responsive mobile first HP layout.
So there should be one design that suits all screens. How hard would it be for HP to convert to something like that, and how much would it cost? Sounds like a big undertaking.
Yes it is a big task, but there are major advantages going forward - 1 design to maintain rather than 2. The inherent simplicity also has many advantages. Other companies are doing it. The major problem I see is that moving away from "Stella" to providing "what users want simply and easily on mobile devices" would be a major change in philosophy for HP => elegant simplicity, concise smart information, simple one column responsive layout. => NOT big and complex, and capsule stuffed.
Great minds think alike. I did a ytd for both HP and my main account earlier today. I set it at weekly. It shows what you said clear as a bell.
Update: AOL have launched a Mobile First update for their website.
http://corp.aol.com/2015/06/02/aol-com- … ile-growt/
Interesting, it makes sense I guess, but how folks try to do so much via phone is crazy as you cannot see anything on those tiny screens - LOL
by Dr. John Anderson5 years ago
Traffic and earnings appear to be down for many. When do HP expect the benefits of the layout changes to shine through the gloom?
by Dr. John Anderson2 years ago
It appears that traffic, after the restructure to sink the subs, has stabilised to a new Panda "Quota" of 750 K which is down 15-20% from the 2015 traffic trend (850 K) . No sign of recovery - but here's...
by jasonycc7 years ago
I now have 15 hubs. I am hitting 300 pageviews per day. 1 of my hubs on FIFA World Cup 2010 is contributing to 70% of the traffic. There rest of it with 13 hubs hitting 3 to 10 pageviews per day and 1 hub with 0 views...
by Karen Curtis8 years ago
10/5/2008 Published 1st Hub11/11/2008 Hit 1,000 pageviews4/3/2009 Hit 10,000 pageviews6/6/2009 Hit 20,000 pageviews7/6/2009 Hit 30,000...
by arun kuruvilla3 years ago
just share your page views in last 24 hrs.my page views is now 120 in 1 day.is that a good score?
by Emma8 years ago
Holy Moly, I just saw my milestone posted on Hubtivity. 1,000,000 pageviews. I feel like it really wasn't that long ago that it was 10,000 pageviews, but I've been a member of Hubpages for over 2 years now and it is has...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.