I know that hubpages is strict about violations and copyright but is it a violation to post a youtube video in your hub, which you know includes copyrighted material, which the one uploading the video did not have permission to upload? Like a movie clip or a song lyrics video. I know the internet is flooded by videos like that I was just wondering if it was considered a violation.
No - it is not a violation to post a YouTube video in a hub.
Use the video capsule, find the video you want and enter the link. If the author ever removes the video from YouTube, you will get a broken link message from HP which can be easily fixed.
HP strongly recommends that you watch an entire video before adding it to your hub, to make sure there are no problems or inappropriate parts.
Copyright wise, it's Youtube's problem. Hubpages wise, at most you'll get a warning and have to replace the video if they think there is an issue - such as watermarking in the videos.
WryLit got it, I think, All we can put in our Hubs is the link to who holds the video. There have been occasions when I'd like to add a reference and/or a title, but for the most part, all we can do is make the link.
If you were somehow able to make a copy of the video and download it to your HubPages video storage area, then you might be creating a problem.
I don't quite understand what you're saying. If I post the link into a video capsule is that okay then? Or is it only okay to post the link and direct the reader to the video on youtube?
"If I post the link into a video capsule is that okay then?"
That is the way I've always treated it. My understanding is that HubPages holds only the link, not the content. You are merely providing something similar to an advertisement for the YouTube content.
That understanding changes if you load the video to your own video storage area at http://hubpages.com/my/videos/gallery. My understanding - when done that way, HubPages holds both the content and the link. You are at risk if you violate the originators rights at time of upload to the video area. Fortunately for us, this does not automatically happen when you merely provide just a link in the HubPage video capsule.
And as others have so carefully stated above, I'm not a lawyer, and I don't work for HubPages. You may need a response from someone who works at HubPages.
Okay, it's been a couple of years since I caught up on the latest with YouTube and copyright, and I can't answer for what HubPages considers a violation of their TOS. And I'm not a lawyer. And I'm also not sure exactly what you're asking here. 'Cause you seem to already know the answer - that yes, it's a violation of copyright to embed YouTube material you don't have the rights to use.
When the rights-holder of the video uploads a YouTube video, they can control whether or not to allow embedding. If they allow it, I believe this means you have the right to embed it if you do so under YouTube's Terms of Service.
Even when embedding is enabled, I've written the rights-holder/creator for permission to make sure I'm okay. That's because I'm pretty careful about knowing my usage rights 'cause I don't want a headache later. Not everyone is so careful, I'm guessing because they're willing to risk a possible headache.
However - and I think this is the situation you describe - if the person uploading the video to YouTube does not hold the rights, but does enable embedding for users such as yourself, then that STILL doesn't give any usage rights to such users who weren't the one to originally violate copyright.
It's kinda like using a photo posted on Flickr without permission from the original photographer/model. Or buying a house without the real title, for that matter. Even if you don't know it's stolen property, you don't have legal rights to it 'cause the person who gave/sold you the property didn't legally hold it. If you know going in that it's not the uploader's IP, then that's kind of a heads-up that you're likely to have to deal with a headache later.
So if I post the link to a youtube video in a video capsule in my hub, which is uploded by someone who had a right to use it then it is okay? But if the person doesn't have the right I could get in trouble as well even though I was only linking to it? Is that what you're saying?
Sounds like you got it. But honestly, if I were you I'd check YouTube's current TOS to get a better sense of the state of things. When I last checked it, the TOS were vaguely worded enough regarding permissions to be unsettling.
I think I'm not a good person to listen to if what you need is a black-or-white answer.
You want to keep in mind that intellectual property law is on the cusp of going through some fairly drastic changes - it will need to, because existing law was mostly established about a century ago, in a different kind of distribution market - that of print. Today it needs to accommodate the technology of the digital age and the reality of sharing, search engines, and mashups, a world where the original work is hard to track. There are a lot of gray areas that were formerly black and white.
So though people might give you yes or no answers, and they might reassure you, if you're like me, you'll find it most reassuring to go to the source. Research copyright law on copyright.gov or ask a lawyer. If you're most concerned about complying with HubPages' policy, you can ask HubPages staff what they will or won't allow, but you might get a vague answer - like "You must have the rights to the work." Then it's a matter of doing the research to assure yourself you do have the rights. Being misinformed unfortunately isn't a good defense.
I wouldn't be a bit shocked if, in the future, somebody came to me and said I was using somebody's work without permission, even if I thought I had the rights. In my eyes, there's that much room for uncertainty now. For example, regarding YouTube, I believe the way video rights-holders grant embedding rights is by default. By not disabling embedding rights, they enable them. That kind of passive permission may not be acceptable in the future - and I'm not expert enough to know if any legacy action could happen if and when that kind of thing changes.
Waive, it sounds murky but I believe what has been said is that it is technically an internet violation. But I don't know how often uploaders actually get in trouble for it. There must be a bazillion uploaded youtube videos on sites all over the world, including the zillion on HP. I admit to doing it myself.
There have been three occasions I can recall when all that happened was that the videos were "cut off" by the "video police" who search out unauthorized use of videos. You'll find out when you go to edit your hub and the video capsule is blank with some type of generic statement. The videos that were removed from my hubs included: Taylor Swift, Carly Simon, and a clip of President Obama making a flub during a speech.
So, take your chances as most of us do. But it is a matter of what's ethical in the end. I am guilty as charged.
Respectfully, I'm not sure I agree with you. Often ethics and the law coincide, but not always. In the case of intellectual property, I don't think it's that clear-cut.
When someone "steals" my work, it's quite rare that I think of it as an unethical action. In many cases, they are simply doing what comes naturally in today's social media - another kind of sharing - and they truly have no clue it's a violation of copyright. It "feels" to them like fair use.
And sometimes people do know it's illegal but have a sense that the law is unjust. It may just be that they're just unethical - or it may be that they're using their "ethical senses" to sense a change in the wind of the law, itself...
It is an interesting question especially when one has to consider that the person posting the video is the one earning from the video, not the person who put the video on their Hub. In a way, we are helping to promote the video and the person who posted it which is why it is better to post our own videos which we place onto youtube.
They do if they want to, it is their choice whether they make it commercial or not.
I know but surely Google wouldn't give them access to the ad program if they uploaded copyrighted material that wasn't their own
I never suggested that the videos were not their own. I upload my own videos and the content is mine.
Janshares, I'm aware of that, so what you're saying is that the worst case scenario is that the video will be removed from youtube and hence no longer available in my hub but that's it. Me sharing it is fine.
I use YouTube videos all the time but so far there haven't been any problems, so I doubt it matters as much as one would believe.
by Crystal Tatum 9 years ago
How do I include a video with my hub without violating copyright law?I'd like to include a video with my next hub but my research on copyright law has left me confused and a bit scared to do that. Though most people seem to think YouTube is fair game, based on my interpretation of the law, that's...
by Jake Ed 8 years ago
Are there any copyright issues associated with posting YouTube videos in hubs?In short, is there any way to get in trouble for doing this if it is a video from a user other than yourself?
by Noah Franks 8 years ago
Embedding youtube videosI have youtube videos. I have embedding access allowed on my videos. Can others embed my youtube videos onto other sites, and somehow profit from them? Will I still get adsense earnings from the views from this? Should I keep embedding on and allow...
by CennyWenny 13 years ago
All right, I'm new to the hubpage world, but my biggest question has to do with picture and video sources. What crosses the line of legality? Where can I get media for my pages legally? I see all sorts of Youtube videos and pictures that I don't think the author took...but this is the internet. I...
by lee 4 years ago
I have not used hubpages for around a year and have recently started to get back into it, I must admit that in the beginning I was a little Naive and posted images into my hubs willy nilly without thought of where they came from. I have recently recieved an email from a photo place saying that I...
by Ronald E Franklin 5 years ago
I'm planning a hub about one particular actor in one particular scene of a movie. Without a visual representation of the actor in the scene the article would be meaningless, but no free or non-copyrighted photos appear to exist. To me this seems a classic case for Fair Use, as reflected in this...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|