I just noticed a new feature on Hubpages. A new button is added to each published hub. It allows the hubber to recommend the hub for consideration to transfer to one of the existing niche site.
There is a10 step question which you must answer. Once submitted, you can only submit another recommendation in 60 days.
Thanks to the staff of HubPages for this addition. Great job!
Where is it? I looked on several of my hubs and didn't see any button like this!
You missed Christy's announcement and last week's newsletter? Here it is...
http://hubpages.com/community/forum/137 … r-requests
I read the announcement but missed the button thing. I was clicking on articles that already are on niche sits just to take a look, and the button isn't on those hubs. Duh!!!
How about somebody listing the ten stages of the submission process?
Yes, please. It will be easier for people to do it right and only submit hubs that qualify if they know the criteria before they push the button to start the process.
You can work through the process without commiting yourself to anything.
Just take a look.
Thank you. I'm not comfortable checking the boxes if I don't feel the hub matches the criteria above it yet. I also cannot find the percentage of topic-related words allowed in the blurb about keyword stuffing so there's no way I can check the box if I can't know if my hub meets the criteria. HubPages requires a lower-than-natural concentration of topic-related words than print publisher or ezines require, so unless they publish what percentage is allowed, I can't know if my hub meets their standards.
Look at it this way... If you are making an effort at placing keywords in your content then you are probably over-doing it. But if you are writing naturally without worrying about keywords, then Google bots will not detect a problem and you should be good to go. HubPages knows that.
By the way, it's not HubPages making rules. Google has been getting very tough on keyword stuffing or anything that comes close to looking like you are trying to game the system. HubPages is on our side, protecting us to be sure we ( and they) are successful. You can't compare to ezine or other sites.
Actually, you are wrong; I wasn't purposely placing keywords, but writing naturally when HubPages edited out words related to the topic of one of my hubs. 'Homeless shelter' is really the only thing the public calls homeless shelters and 'homeless' is really the only commonly-used (and polite) single word to describe people without homes. Overuse of pronouns and the avoidance of the natural use of topic-related words by replacing them with synonyms doesn't actually make a piece read better to humans. I've had material about homelessness print published with the density of "keywords" HubPages finds unacceptable.
Yes, I can compare HubPages to the world of print publications and ezines (ezine means online magazine) because they are written to please human readers and, in the case of online magazines, to please Google as well. Most of them require natural keyword densities rather than unnaturally low keyword densities. HubPages requires a lower than natural density of what they consider keywords so they should just state what percentage it is so we can comply with it.
You will hate me for saying this but your writing style involves an awful lot of repetition.
The quote above could be rephrased:
Most publications accept a higher keyword density than HP. It would help to know the actual figure that this site considers a problem.
Also, I reckon it is repetition of phrases that is really problematic, eg homeless people, keyword density. Something jars in the ear. I try never to repeat any word in a sentence. Most writers do.
Even if it's simply that I'm a droning, repetitive person, I'm still a person who isn't trying to add more iterations of topic-related words to my writing, yet still arrives at a percentage of keywords HubPages considers keyword stuffing. Don't worry, I can't hate you for voicing a much milder opinion than I'd already guessed you held. Thanks for trying to spare my feelings.
I don't know how to implement a rule defined by what sounds natural to someone else. I'm not someone else, so I need parameters that mean more than another person having a feeling that they won't share or quantify. They are defining keyword stuffing by intentions, but measuring it by results. They are using a percentage, so there's no real reason they can't just share it.
I don't think that your writing is dull or droning. I think that, sometimes, you are striving too hard for accuracy. I do it myself when I am really trying to make a point and I am desperate not be misunderstood. I hammer points home in a way that makes the text overly dense and unnatural.
I'm not sure percentages would help you, to be honest. Just be more aware of repitition.
by Phyllis Doyle Burns 5 years ago
My daily earnings have dropped drastically -- WHY? Is it because HP has pulled ads on my hubs due to the "unfeatured" hubs, which are mostly poems? Are poems not worthy of being featured and getting daily earnings? And WHY does HP decide what should or should not be featured?...
by Edweirdo 8 years ago
I'm pretty new at this, so I can really only gauge my hubs' performance against one another!This one is one of my earliest hubs, yet it has fewer views than ones that I've published just a few days ago.http://hubpages.com/hub/How-To-Choose-T … k-CookwareGranted, it's only been 3 weeks, but...
by ryankett 9 years ago
And indeed my hub rating, after doing something with my hubs.It may seem like stating the obvious, but I went through all of hubs and put the absolute maximum number of tags that I could before it said "you have too many tags" or whatever it says. When it said that I had too many tags I...
by Steve Andrews 6 years ago
People have suggested I join Infobarrel so I did. I unpublished and deleted a hub here about La Guancha in Tenerife and thought I would use it as my first InfoBarrel article. The first problem I ran into was it said I was using a keyword too much. The keyword was roses and I was saying that there...
by Novel Treasure 3 years ago
I just logged in and it shows every single one of my hubs highlighted in pink, to need review. The majority of these were well trafficked and featured hubs or editor's choice. Did something happen? I tried looking in the questions and forums and didn't see anything. I am not a former Squidoo person...
by Ryan Hupfer 8 years ago
I was looking through a few of the HubChallenge Hubs and I wanted to give you all a little advice on how to use the Google Keyword Tool to give your high-quality Hub it's highest traffic and earnings potential possible. I used a current HubChallenger's Hub as an example (Jane@CM I hope you don't...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|