Today I noticed that some of the niche sites are not always showing the updated dates in the SERPS. I've seen this specifically with Spinditty, Exemplore and Pethelpful. Instead it is showing a much earlier date, and not necessarily even the publication date.
If fact, at least one of my Hubs is showing a date in the SERPS from before I even joined HubPages! What goes on here?
This is bad. People are less likely to click through on articles that look old and ignored, and it will eventually lead to a drop in the SERPS for these articles if it hasn't already. Google may already be re-indexing articles it is identifying as old and out-of-date.
I'm wondering if this, not just the election, has led to some of the traffic drop over the past few days.
I hope somebody on the HP engineering team is awake on a Sunday. This is potentially a major problem.
This sounds like a computer glitch. Notify the team asap...they need to see this. It's a very big problem due to copyright issues, etc.
If you read the description of this forum, that's exactly what this forum is supposed to be for - to report problems.
They don't want individuals emails from every single Hubber about this.
There is no one in the office on a Sunday.
I wasn't aware of that. Never did understand the forum descriptions...I was just trying to advise the OP, since he brought this up, to email the team. I was not advising everybody to do so...just him!
Yes, but others reading your advice could think that was the right thing to do.
The description of this forum is pretty clear. It says:
"Have you noticed a bug on HubPages? Please report it in this staff-monitored forum."
As Marisa said, posting in this forum is notifying the Team.
I didn't think about the copyright aspect. Depending on what exactly is going on here, Google may begin to see stolen Hubs as originals. No good at all.
Can anyone provide examples of articles this is happening with? Screenshots of what you're seeing in SERPs would be really helpful for us as well.
If you will look on my post above, you will find an example of this from Pethelpful.
Thank you, Christy. I could give you dozens but here are three:
https://pethelpful.com/fish-aquariums/B … plies-List (shows date of Mar 21, 2012 in SERPS. Was published 1/29/15 and last updated 5/1/16)
https://pethelpful.com/fish-aquariums/B … Small-Tank (shows date of Dec 20. 2011 in SERPs. Was published 12/29/13 and last updated on 05/26/15.
https://pethelpful.com/fish-aquariums/S … l-Aquarium (Shows date of Nov 19, 2010 in SERPs. Was published 03/04/13 and last updated 12/07/15)
This seems to be happening irrespective of HP account, niche site or search engine, from what I can tell.
Update: This is occurring with HP Hubs as well, not just niche sites. I've seen a few instance now where the date seems to be taken from out of left field, sometimes several years before the Hub was actually published.
Seriously, nobody else is seeing this?
This is the first one I even checked:
How to Breed Your Female Dog Successfully | PetHelpful
https://pethelpful.com › Dogs › Dog Mating & Pregnancy
Feb 7, 2008
I did not join HP until 2012, so did not write it in 2008. Not sure how they are coming up with that date.
This issue should be urgently addressed. The hub that i published 3 days ago now showing Apr 20, 2012. I checked to see the hub ranking, and i found that it has dropped in ranking more than i could imagine.
My scientific method may not be the greatest but there does seem to be a very direct correlation between the date is not displaying correctly and lost traffic.
My overall traffic is down by several thousand views across all my accounts. Some Hubs aren't impacted at all, and those seem to be displaying the right date for the most part.
It sure would be super if HP staff could pop into this thread and at least let us know they are aware of the situation and working on it.
Your comment begs the question: Are they monitoring this forum or not and, if so, how often. Perhaps my suggestion to contact them wasn't so out of line, anyhow!
I believe this is a google bug. We are looking at it and I'll notify google as well. Thanks for posting these examples.
I looked at this just for a second, but it looks like google is pulling the date to show in the serps based on the date of the YouTube video.
I sent instructions to google to reproduce it.
Thanks again for showing the examples.
Thanks for looking into this, Paul. It does seem to be occurring with other search engines too. Not just Google.
For example, Ask shows dates and they are the same wrong dates. That makes me wonder if there is something weird with the data HP is showing crawlers. Is that possible?
I see what you mean about the YouTube videos, but it seems to be happening to some Hubs with videos and not others. Very strange.
Hope Google gets back to you soon and this gets straightened out. Traffic seems to be coming back a little today, but still down from where I'd expect it to be.
I think ask syndicates google so it would make sense they both have the issue. I found another site with the same issue as well. Pretty sure this one is on google.
Google acknowledged it. They have multiple reports, so we aren't the only ones impacted. They usually fix things like this relatively quickly.
We've been following a few strange things going on that looks like bugs. It's possible that it's some sort of update, but I'm not convinced.
Traffic has been a bit soft since the election, but in general rankings look good. I'm hoping it's a bug that gets fixed and for folks impacted, they see their traffic come back.
There is a post on Search Engine Land about this today.
They say it isn't hurting search ranking, I have to think in the long-term it surely will. An article will eventually drop in ranking if fewer people are clicking through because it looks old.
Hopefully there is no "long term" and things get back to normal soon. I guess all we can do is wait.
The bug was just fixed. My guess is it will take a few days to update everything. I can see a few articles with the date corrected already.
Thanks Paul. It may be a coincidence, but I noticed today that my views went back up again. Perhaps it is because of what you did. Either way, I appreciate your efforts on our behalf.
I suspect it will take a few days, but traffic is trending up from last week. Hard to know how much traffic was impacted by the election, date bug, and the unconfirmed google update.
We see ranking were actually slightly improved last week, so I'm optimistic that when the date bug is processed, we will see an increase.
Paul - (and Christy) thank you for looking into this so promptly - I'm glad someone noticed it and posted the issue here!
I hope traffic recovers quickly - I've noticed sagging numbers, too. Meanwhile, I am still loving the niche sites - they've made a huge difference in things!
by Dr Mark 23 months ago
Over 1/4 of my hubs have not been moved to a niche site. They do not have much traffic from Google, so it is not HPs fault that they have not been selected. There is nothing wrong with them, but they do not have "Google love" so are only moved in the slow process where I ask HP to move...
by Elise 9 days ago
I've seen a lot of people say no, but I've also seen people saying they are making money through HubPages. So which is it?
by Dina Sostarec 10 days ago
Hi,Do more experienced Hubbers have any useful tips for getting your article moved to a niche site? I kept seeing advice that goes something like "make sure you write a high-quality article" but it just seems so vague to me. I have 9 articles now and the only one that was moved to a niche...
by Missing Link 19 months ago
I'm thinking the answer is probably yes?If you have hubs that have been deemed "not featured", for one reason or another, will that factor into lowering your overall score/rating as a HubPages member? Example--let's say your overall rating is 75. If 10 non featured hubs become...
by Eugene Brennan 2 weeks ago
Maybe new categories could be added and selected articles re-sorted and taken out of the "miscellaneous" category on niche sites? Presumably when sites were setup, anything that didn't fit ended up in this class, but it just doesn't look good in the site link structure on SERPS....
by Oyewole Folarin 20 months ago
An editor reviewed this particular hub and decided that due to the fact that it has been extensively covered they could not get it on Toughnickel. To my surprise I found it doing well on the main site - HubPages.
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|