|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
I just had one of these capsules snipped from a hub. Why can't we use them in non-recipe hubs? If Hubpages had pages coded to support Google Review stars, hubs would stand out from the competition in search results (Wikihow and similar sites support them).
The star rating was originally created for recipe Hubs. At the time, HubPages let us use it for anything, but then realised that was confusing Google. Apparently the coding is a rich snippet which tells Google "this is a recipe".
I don't know why they've never gotten around to producing a rich snippet for a star rating for reviews.
How we and the community were using the markup for recipes and reviews was causing us a google penalty. It's one of the things that Google evaluates site wide. So, we decided to only use the article markup for now. We think markup can be helpful, but it's tough to enforce the rules for it to the standard that's required.
Related to this, I was helping a large site the other day with a manual action they didn't interpret quite right related to recipe markup. If you use recipe markup on a site, be sure that you strictly follow the rules and only use it on food recipes with a single recipe per page.
Here are the guidelines for properly using a mark up in your article. On the left of that article are links to recipe guidelines, etc.
Eugene, asking for stars on the usefulness of an article, doesn't meet Google's guidelines, so it was removed.
I can see where authors would make mistakes if they don't know the specifics, e.g., if you add a star rating for a recipe you can only have one recipe in the article.
Does that mean Robin that sites such as Wikhow that use markup to show stars for the usefulness of an article are doing so against Google's guidelines?
I don't believe they are using a technical mark up for this information. It's similar to our old system of giving an article a thumbs up; it is more of an internal metric.
Ok, but do you know how they manage to get a star rating displayed in Google search results?
They probably use the markup and monitor that it is used correctly for reviews, etc. They don't use it for usefulness of an article. As Paul said, we removed the ability for Google to see our markup because our authors were using it incorrectly and we were being penalized for it.
Ok, but it still looks good. This is how it appears in a search:
Every feature that can be exploited by self-promoters will be exploited to the hilt by Hubbers.
Every feature that can used misused will be routinely misused.
You don't want to arm them with opportunities to shoot themselves in the foot. Or our feet, to stretch a metaphor.
Actually, Wikihow does use the article schema with the aggregate review element.
https://search.google.com/structured-da … First-Time
I'd consider testing it on a few pages, but given some of the issues with schema penalties we will want to be very careful with it.
I agree with your point, it does help pages stand out in results.
Thanks for pointing it out, Eugene. I learned something new today!
I had one snipped to and never got a reason. I used it because i had a recipe in the hub for making homemade cleaner. I thought it was approprate since people would be trying it. but they removed anyway. THen i got a warning saaying without it it wont show as a recipe. Now iam not sure what to do. I thought the rating capsule would be good to have.
Terrielynn, did you use a recipe capsule to create the recipe for the home cleaner? If so, the system is expecting a ratings capsule to go with it.
Recipe capsules are for FOOD, not other kinds of recipes, so I'd recommend removing the recipe capsule and just using an ordinary text capsule instead.
hi Marrisa. I'll have to check. That does make sense. Thank you. I am going to go check.
by Simone Haruko Smith6 years ago
Happy Friday, Hubbers!I am happy to announce that the new Special Layout Options for recipes and reviews that we introduced on our blog earlier this week are now live. Head over to the HubTool and have a look!In...
by NotPC5 years ago
I have been experimenting with Google to find new techniques to drive more search traffic and I found one that is quite silly but has doubled my traffic within about a week of updating my hub.Here it is: THE RATING...
by Scott S Bateman23 months ago
Quite a few of my Hubs have related Hubs. I try to put a few links in a Hub to another related Hub when it seems appropriate. But I see that the editors often remove them. I have tried to find out why in past forum...
by Simone Haruko Smith5 years ago
Our Rigorous Review contest spans from October 31st at 12:00pm PT to November 28th at 12:00pm PT. During this period, if you publish a Hub with a Ratings Capsule set to single or multiple person reviews, you will be...
by Laura Schneider4 years ago
Although the "Ratings" capsule is available under the list of "Supplementary Capsules", "Ratings" is not one of the choices available on the Insert Capsule tool. This becomes important...
by Cheeky Kid3 years ago
Do you use the Ratings Capsule?I do! I always use it. I actually have it on all of my hubs. This brings me to the through: Is it really healthy to use it all of the time? I've read countless of other hubs already and...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.