jump to last post 1-4 of 4 discussions (5 posts)

Feedback: Spontaneous human combustion a revolutionary new explanation

  1. em_saenz profile image46
    em_saenzposted 8 months ago

    Hi Hubbers,

    I'd like some help with passing the Quality Assessment Process. Will you please give feedback on my article [url=https://hubpages.com/education/Spontaneous-human-combustion-a-revolutionary-new-explanation[/url]. What can I do to improve? Thanks!

    1. Jeremy Gill profile image95
      Jeremy Gillposted 8 months agoin reply to this

      Please remove the  "url=" from future links to make it easier for us. Here are my suggestions:

      1) Capitalize key words in your title and your headings.
      2) Remove extra white space in-between certain paragraphs.
      3) Not too many spelling/grammar errors, but a few sentences could be improved. For example, pluralize "attack" and use a comma before the but in the sentence "It is very hard to protect yourself against electronic attack but you may find some helpful hints here."
      4) Watch your word count. Your article has a much better chance of being Featured if it reaches 700 words, preferably more.

      Best of luck!

  2. psycheskinner profile image83
    psycheskinnerposted 8 months ago
  3. psycheskinner profile image83
    psycheskinnerposted 8 months ago

    You have a pixelated image. 

    QAP won't care, but  you don't cover the main conventional explanation, the wick effect, suggesting an unbalanced assessment of the issue (e.g. straw man argument).

  4. em_saenz profile image46
    em_saenzposted 8 months ago

    Thank you for your help. I will try your suggestions

 
working