I've come across a couple hubs that have really awful spelling and grammar but are on vertical sites. I know the vertical sites are HubPages' way of cherry-picking the best content, so how do these articles make it through?
Example lines from one hub on a network site:
"What will the future holds for HubPages, no one knows."
"I have published hubs on all kind of topics..."
"It just take advantage of how..."
"...and it is manged through a PayPal account Only."
"This just mean that you want to be..."
"...with a combined assets of over..."
The whole hub is rife with issues. I don't mean to pick on this one hubber, but I have seen content like this on a number of vertical sites.
I would report any hub, no matter where it is located, for having such poor grammar, spelling, etc. It to the benefit of every person who works for or on this site that we do this. Low quality work is what almost ruined HP, so we can't afford to have this happen again. If we call attention to such poor work, the team should address the issue. If they don't, then we should contact Paul or Robin directly about it. We finally have a good situation here, so we should do all we can to protect it.
It's possible those Hubs were part of the initial tranche of Hubs moved to the niche sites.
The only criteria for the first tranche was Google traffic - HubPages used the top 20% of Hubs as the basis for the niche sites, on the basis that they must be good if Google loved them.
When the Fred update hit, they realised their mistake and they are now going through and checking all those Hubs for quality, I believe.
This is all true Marisa, but as long as the author leaves it alone, it will not be caught. They only re-check hubs for quality when they are updated. I know, because every time I update a hub on a niche site they send me a congratulatory email saying it still meets quality guidelines. However, they don't check every one when updated.
I found the one melbel was referring to with a search of the first example. It's worse than those examples indicate. The author included a screenshot of this earnings page, which is totally against TOS. I can't believe that HubPages accepted that one for Letterpile even at the beginning stage of the moves.
In addition, it looks like this one was updated a couple of months ago. It's disconcerting that they don't seem to check every hub when updated. I'm sure they would have rejected the posting of his earnings if they saw it.
They are caught on SOME of the niche sites, but you are right - it's only the niche sites that were affected by Fred. I've had notifications for several of my Hubs, saying they were under review even though I hadn't touched them - but from memory, they are on HealDove and perhaps one or two others.
Oh yes indeed! You are so right about HealDove. That was hit the worst by Fred, and so they were being very careful with that one. Most (if not all) of my HealDove hubs were re-checked even though I didn't update them. I received the same emails, unexpectedly, saying they were each approved for quality.
I offered to volunteer to edit hubs for HubPages, but they weren't interested. There was a wildly popular hub on the education site that was factually incorrect and also contained spelling/grammar mistakes. I emailed suggested changes to HubPages and they weren't interested, so I just dropped the subject. I know it was popular and all, but the changes were small enough to not be significant (but large enough to make it look more polished.)
In our initial push to move to Network Sites, we moved thousands of articles in the span of a few months. Every article was assessed, and we did reject some articles even if their traffic was high. I'm sure we made some mistakes, and we are constantly recalibrating our process. Our standards are higher now than they were initially, and we have checks and balances now that we didn't have then. For example, every week we have leads that are looking through a subset of recent curation decisions and recent edits and giving feedback to the editors. We also meet weekly to discuss common mistakes that we are seeing to prevent them from happening in the future.
In terms of articles already on sites, we will be going through all of them—even if they haven't been recently edited. It will take time, but we will be looking at every article on Network Sites eventually. As of now, we are looking at every article that is edited to make sure that content edited/added is useful to the reader.
The process of having our community involved in editing is complex. Our systems are not designed for a wiki-type environment, but we are looking into ways that the community can help for the betterment of the Network. I'm always open to suggestions if you want to email me.
by Larry Slawson 4 weeks ago
Hey everyone. Just curious if anyone else has been having difficulties with getting their Hubs moved to vertical sites? For the last two years that I have been on HubPages, nearly every article I wrote was automatically moved (by the staff) to these sites within a few days of me...
by Lori Colbo 2 years ago
I get notices often now informing me my hub has been selected for a vertical site. But I keep hearing the word niche too. Are they the same thing?Also, those articles which don't go to vertical or niche sites, do they get less notice on google? If an article is strictly on HP, can we edit and...
by Dina Sostarec 3 days ago
Hi,Do more experienced Hubbers have any useful tips for getting your article moved to a niche site? I kept seeing advice that goes something like "make sure you write a high-quality article" but it just seems so vague to me. I have 9 articles now and the only one that was moved to a niche...
by Michael Kismet 2 years ago
I already have a number of hubs moved to the Hubpages network sites, but haven't really seen a drastic traffic change in said hubs. So, is it worth the risk to submit one of my hubs that already receives a decent amount of daily views to a vertical site?I'd hate to see aforementioned hub drop in...
by Brittany Brown 2 years ago
Has anyone else noticed that we can now submit 5 articles to the vertical sites every 14 days? They recently decreased the time limit in which we could submit (I think it was every 90 days, to 14 now) and now we can do 5 at time, which is really encouraging! Did anyone else know about...
by Scott S Bateman 10 months ago
I have been pleased with the audience and revenue for my articles on HubPages since joining the site some years ago.I commend the company for creating the successful niche sites at a time when similar sites were folding. My existing articles that moved to those sites have done even better than...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|