Should Hubpages start providing a Peer Review Process
With new search algorithms from Google and Bing and Yahoo relying more on the social relevancy of content and the social trustworthiness of content as well as higher quality content, should HubPages as a service to Hubbers and the Community, offer a Peer Review Process to help make content higher in quality in terms of writing and overall content.
Would this result in another censorship body? I understand that there is a place you can have your Hubs reviewed and fine-tuned by other Hubbers. I think the best peer reviews are shown by your peers not reading your stuff and through comments. Now...a beer review...that would get my vote!
I personally don't think this is necessary. There is a forum for critique and reviews, Extreme Hub Makeover, for those who wish to receive feedback. Also there are the accolades, share functions, and Vote Up, Vote Down, Flag buttons.
Peer Reviews can be quite subjective rather than objective when working with such a diverse group of writers/publishers. A lot of hubbers learn and grow so much with the vast amount of help already available from the HubPages community. Really all one needs to do is ask, and someone will gladly help.
No. Peer reviews are when people read your hubs. If they don't like them then they won't follow you. There is also feedback and comments you can leave. There is your peer review.
I think, as others have already noted, that HubPages already provides a very worthwhile peer review process.
Not by name, but by functionality, via the various methods of rating able to be carried out by fellow Hubbers, who by definition are other writers, and thus peers.
It's also a reality based, real-time system, operated voluntarily, not by demand. Which adds to, rather than detracts from, its credibility and relevance.
It's further supplemented by an efficient process for collectively contributing to the removal of spun articles, and clearly substandard (objectively, not subjectively assessed) work, via the Hub Hopper.
You can't get a much more pure peer review system than that.
If on the other hand, you're talking about the widely held, but very wrong, perception that 'peer' equals 'superior', you may well find support from those who see themselves that way.
For myself, I'll be the first to form a group in opposition.
The existing comments section provides for those with the need to display their ego in public, but writers have the ability to deny such comments, and for those who feel the need (generally well-founded, and well-intentioned, I'm sure) to let a fellow Hubber know of a particular transgression, without causing hurt or embarrassment, the facility already exists to send the writer an email via Hubpages itself.
And finally, the introduction of individual user domains, not huddled beneath the HubPages identity, is designed to minimise the negative effect of any bad, or even just less commercial, work that does survive.
A perfect system? Nothing is. But it's not bad.
That's my tuppence worth, anyway.
I think it would be a good idea because then I probably would not have to write things for moderators. I can't be myself on HubPages because moderators like deleting my stuff even though some others like it.
by kschang6 years ago
I know "duplicate" means "substantial" portion of the hub appeared elsewhere. I hit duplicate before when I accidentally "republished" one of my own blog entries as a hub. However, here's a...
by Pollyanna Jones2 years ago
I have written two Hubs this weekend. One is an Arts and Crafts article, the other is Folklore. I completed the Folklore piece on Saturday afternoon, but had a look through it this morning and edited it again whilst it...
by Natalie Frank13 months ago
In the last day I have come across a few differences when I send a hub for review. First there is a page that comes up that requires me to check a box attesting to my confirmation that I will only publish high...
by girly_girl098 years ago
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/endortest.shtmFrom what I understand, it affects bloggers that are directly paid to endorse or review a product. Here on HP, we don't get paid to write reviews (well, some of you might),...
by Brian6 years ago
I posted a hub about an email I got from Netflix. I quoted the letter so that my commentary had context and I gave full credit to the original source etc. I am wondering why my hub has been dubbed as such when I posted...
by Jyoti Kothari9 years ago
Google says no nudity. These hubs violating policy. The so called authors of these hubs are very clever. They become fan of any one and in return they get fans. Thus they have maximum number of fans. As these galeries...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.