Concerns About Poor Hub Quality

Jump to Last Post 1-13 of 13 discussions (33 posts)
  1. Carol the Writer profile image68
    Carol the Writerposted 14 years ago

    Want to see some amazing low quality hubs? Go to the top of the page, click hubbers, then click "latest". There will be a few good ones but at least half are spam and many hubs are just a few sentences, often in a rambling broken English. There are some sophisticated ads disguised as hubs, often by the same person with a string of IDs promoting a web.

    Anyway, over half of the hubs are bad. What will this do to how Google ranks hubpages? Can there be a way for hubpages to temporarily put new hubs in a holding area until someone just glances at them to see if they meet minimum guidelines?

    Here is what happened to me.I wrote a hub on Space Shuttle Retirement on 9/23/09. I few weeks later, I wrote and submitted some articles a bring traffic to my hub, under the name Amy Adams. (My first set of articles were going to be from AA, my second set from BB, etc.) Her articles have 2 links to my hubs.

    In a Google search for "space shuttle retirement" with and without quotes, an article by my pseudonym Amy Adams, published in tech edition, is ranked above mine. I guess that thetechedition .com is considered by Google to be more credible than hub pages.

    My hub on Space Shuttle Retirement is on Google search page 1 (about#10) if you search for "space shuttle retirement" and on page 2 (about#18) if you do the same search without quotes and the thetechedition .com article is above me both places. I think this shows that we need for hubpages to be considered more seriously.

    1. relache profile image72
      relacheposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Your responsibility as a member of the Hub community is to flag Hubs that you feel are spam, substandard, overly-promotional, etc.

      That's what the Hub team would like you to do so that their attention is drawn to problems more quickly.  The flag button on each Hub is there just for this purpose, as is the quick problem checklist that displays when you flag a Hub.,

  2. frogdropping profile image77
    frogdroppingposted 14 years ago

    I believe Maddie Ruud is responisble for trying to keep track of such things - but that doesn't mean that she's capable of seeing every single light weight hub.

    That's why there's a flagging option. Use it. I do. Like you said, it's so obvious which ones are spam or similar low-grade crap.

    Anything you see that you know doesn't comply with the TOS, flag it. I'm sure that helps Maddie check the ones she may miss and ultimately, if they're deemed unfit, that helps the hubcommunity smile

    Though ... be fair wink

  3. Len Cannon profile image86
    Len Cannonposted 14 years ago

    Bad writing isn't going to rank, either on hub pages or on search engines.  I understand the frustration over being around writing you're not a fan of but I don't think it should greatly affect your overall performance.   My top performing hubs are number one or two on the search engine results page for their topic, even with other, more specified websites dealing with that information.

    For awhile my Digg submissions ranked higher than my actual articles but I believe if you wait a few weeks they should autocorrect themselves as people follow the links to your actual article.

    It could be that the tech web page is indeed given more credit than hubpages when it comes to topics like space shuttles.  Is your traffic good right now?  What about on the non-space shuttle topics?

  4. Marisa Wright profile image85
    Marisa Wrightposted 14 years ago

    What Relache said. This is a user content site - as such, it's our responsibility to produce the content and contribute to the housekeeping.

  5. Misha profile image63
    Mishaposted 14 years ago

    IMHO it is much more productive to concentrate on your own hubs than to try to correct others.

    1. profile image0
      cosetteposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      i agree.

      i have read some pretty shall we say substandard or even questionable hubs but i have never flagged a single one.

      1. Marisa Wright profile image85
        Marisa Wrightposted 14 years agoin reply to this

        any reason why not?

        1. profile image0
          cosetteposted 14 years agoin reply to this

          why not?

          because i don't feel it is my responsibility and because it just feels wrong. i mean, who am I?

          1. Rochelle Frank profile image91
            Rochelle Frankposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            You are not the one who boots them off-- by flagging you are just bring attention to it. The moderators decide.

        2. yoshi97 profile image55
          yoshi97posted 14 years agoin reply to this

          If they violate the HP TOS, I'm going to flag them.

          If someone spams the forums, I'm going to report them.

          As I see it, as a member of this community, these people are pooping in my sandbox and I'll have none of it.

          With that said, I won't flag a hub because I think it should have been written better - only if it violates the TOS, as I don't want poor Maddie chasing after ghosts.

          Still, I think it does the site a world of good when we all work hard to produce great content, as it makes our site an authority on the internet and improves our earnings.

          HP gets 40% of our impressions, so you can bet your arse they want to see great money producing hubs as much as we do. wink

          1. Marisa Wright profile image85
            Marisa Wrightposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            Exactly how I feel.

      2. Misha profile image63
        Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

        Not that I don't flag a substandard hub if I happen to stumble upon one. But I don't go search for them. smile

    2. thranax profile image72
      thranaxposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      True, but I know it would be a LOT easier for Hubpages to grow correctly if the "Crap" was gone. I went for a look and some are totally stupid. I wanted to report them but I couldn't. They had only 2 links, and it was valid info to the links and topics. It had over 400 words and it wasn't duplicated from the internet. Sigh.. lol.


      1. Misha profile image63
        Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

        Don't try to be holier than pope Thranax, and you feel sooooo much better ;

  6. profile image0
    cosetteposted 14 years ago

    the only hubs i would flag would be those that were stolen.

    maybe those in clear violation of HP's TOS...maybe. if it's our responsibility to police our peers' hubs why do we need moderators?

    1. Marisa Wright profile image85
      Marisa Wrightposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Because HubPages can't afford enough moderators to check every single Hub.

    2. pauldeeds profile imageSTAFF
      pauldeedsposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      While we do devote considerable resources to enforcing our rules, if we hired people to review every single hub, question, answer, or forum post we certainly wouldn't be able to share as much revenue as we do with authors.  We operate the HubPages site, but you the community is what makes it tick.

      Anyway, all that we ask is that if you happen to see something that violates the HubPages rules, help us out by taking a few seconds to flag it.  All flagging something does is bring it to the attention of our moderators.

      1. profile image0
        cosetteposted 14 years agoin reply to this

        ok, i shall do my best. thank you for explaining that.

      2. Marisa Wright profile image85
        Marisa Wrightposted 14 years agoin reply to this

        While I was eating lunch I worked out what I was trying to say.

        cosette, I agree we're not the Hub police.  However, we are Hub citizens.  Not flagging a Hub is like walking past a house, seeing that it's being burgled, and doing nothing. 

        As a citizen, it's not our job to catch the thief, but it is our job to make the authorities aware of it.  When you flag a Hub, you're not making a decision to take it down - you're just letting the right people know, so they can decide.

        1. hinckles koma profile image61
          hinckles komaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

             If i read something that i feel was negative i do have a right to complain. Why not its only right to do that. I agree what you said completely. love all.

    3. relache profile image72
      relacheposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      This site has a handful of employees, all of whom wear a few hats, of which only 1 is moderator.  They need us to help them, and the whole site will be better if we do.

      Take five minutes a day to take a look around, read some stuff and flag the garbage.

  7. ThisGirlsOpinion profile image61
    ThisGirlsOpinionposted 14 years ago

    Focus on writing hubs that you believe contribute to the quality of the website, which is the best use of your time.

  8. Choke Frantic profile image69
    Choke Franticposted 14 years ago

    I hate how a lot of the hubs these days are pretty damn crappy, but I've never even thought to flag a hub I saw as substandard! I think I might try that, at least it'll make me feel better..

  9. Carol the Writer profile image68
    Carol the Writerposted 14 years ago

    Thanks for all the comments. When I am not busy I try to read new hubs.

    If they have any potential I encourage them and make sure they have a link to  If they are so-so, I leave them alone or make suggestions.

    But I flag the ones that are pure spam. There are a lot of get rich quick, come to my website and sign up for my class hubs. There are some hubs that have one sentence.

    Pauldeeds, I just think if you had a "holding tank" where hubs went for, say 4 hours after submittal, and then community volunteers could glance at them and vote up or down if they were out-right spam. And I mean just the really spammy or one-sentence hubs.

    This would improve the overall quality of what is out at any given time.Just an opinion. - Carol 
    P.S. Can we get a spell checker for the forums?

  10. profile image0
    cosetteposted 14 years ago

    yes, i understand now. as Paul said, we are a community. thanks!

  11. AEvans profile image72
    AEvansposted 14 years ago

    I clicked on hubbers and then latest , I agree that some of the hubs are of poor quality but then again some of them are new writers who are trying to take a stab at what they love to do. My percpetion is that all of us have been new at one time or another and everyone needs a chance. If they are just plain garbage flag them or if they are substandard guide them just like may of us who have been around for a couple of years we were new once ourselves. smile

    1. Michael Willis profile image68
      Michael Willisposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      I agree completely with you AEvans.  I know I have learned alot and feel I have improved from others here at HP. I am not quick to judge or put down other writers. I would rather offer to help them improve. But...if something is total garbage/spam...well, that is different.

      What about hubs that are just about keyword stuffing? No names, but I have seen a few that it is like reading a 2-3 word phrase only. I got nothing out of them except a hub written around a keyword/keyword phrase.

      1. AEvans profile image72
        AEvansposted 14 years agoin reply to this

        Keyword stuffing drives me nuts but then again maybe they didn't realize they were keyword stuffing. I have found that once I have gotten to know a new hubber and we have sent e-mails back and forth that some of them are reading all kinds of information on the internet so that is what they believe they should do, only to find that they are not doing it correctly to begin with. As for garbage/spam I flag it for review. smile

      2. relache profile image72
        relacheposted 14 years agoin reply to this

        Keyword stuffing is a form of spamming (direct at a search engine) and it's against the TOS of Google, so I say flag away when you find Hubs that do that.

  12. Carol the Writer profile image68
    Carol the Writerposted 14 years ago

    Yes some are very nice first hubs. Some are obviously just keyword stuffing spam or a 4 word hub saying, "go to by website".

    That was why I was thinking of a holding area might let volunteers flag hubs for review before they were oficially published, thus increasing the number of good hubs that are actually published.

    But even with the present system, if we all look at new hubs for 5 minutes a day like relache says, and flag the spam, it would help.

  13. sandwichmom profile image61
    sandwichmomposted 14 years ago

    I am fairly new - and have noticed that there is some poor quality on here- but on other sites as well. Many seem to have poor grammatical skills- and others that may not understand english vocab common terms. Not that I am perfect by any means.
    Some of the poorly completed in terms of english grammar skills are quite high in their hubber scores. The search engines seem to have found them- I guess.

    1. Rochelle Frank profile image91
      Rochelle Frankposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      I think flagging might help the moderators to make their decisions, but I don't do a lot of flagging. Some things are so bad that they might drag down the whole site.  Bad grammar and spelling are not the worst offenses, and I do think some people who are giving it a good honest try ,and learning in the process need to be given a  bit of a break.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)