Level of expertise?
Would it be desirable and fair if there were a way to indicate on any particular Hub that the writer has a level of expertise/credential in what they are writing about? For example, I'd rather read an article about why I should get a root canal from a dentist than a househusband trying to write to make a few extra bucks.
I think you can use the standard byline at the end of the article which sometimes includes, degrees, credentials, your title, location, etc. I think I've used it before on a couple of hubs. It shouldn't interfere with the HP hub tool copyright. I agree that if you're presenting your expertise, credentials should be included.
While I agree with this in principle, I also think that the reader can usually evaluate the advice or information from the quality of the Hub. I do know a lot of experts who are biased in a certain direction, or simply are not very good at writing clearly. As a person who teaches research writing, I'm also very aware of having to steer my students away from experts who write in too narrow a vein. Those sorts of articles are not useful if you are looking for information for a general audience unfamiliar with that particular topic. Finally, I'd have to say that as a copywriter, I've learned how to research and write clearly on subjects that I actually have no personal expertise in, such as life insurance and plumbing. I've written the websites of many different companies because my copy is clearer and easier to understand and read than something that might have been written by the person performing the service. How do I know? They pay me to do it!
Totally understandable as the Web is full of information that is disproven and downright false. Apart from an expert writing in their field, a true journalist will be able to find valid resources which may include articles and/or interviews to back up the information they write about. The interview/information should be by experts in the field to provide credibility. This is done all the time in journalism, but I am sure it isn't done all the time on Hubpages.
This is an interesting idea, although I can't say I wholeheartedly agree. For advice of a medical nature or scientific nature, then it would be good to know that the person giving advice is qualified, although I am not sure that is necessarily the purpose of Hubpages.
In terms of whether I would trust someone more or less depending on whether they have a qualification, the answer is that it would not make a difference to me at all. There are a lot of people who are extremely passionate and knowledgeable about their specific areas of interest. It would be unfair to dismiss or diminish their work, simply because they are not qualified.
I think this depends largely on how the article is written. I'm no expert at many health related topics and like others I am always searching for home remedies to common ailments, but I know people like to know what others have tried and they would be interested with what I have to tell them just by being an observer.
We might indicate our credentials, memberships, and research experience when necessary 1) at the bottom or top of any Hub or 2) in our HubPages Profiles. Either would work well, I think. In fact, I always look at HP Profiles for credentials when reading Hubs in topics like medicine, dentistry, and psychology, other sciences, and some other subjects.
Journalists can perform a meta-analysis of the existing work in a topic, just as research scientists can accomplish, and write conclusions and opinions about applications and impact for the future. My concern is with any article that presents false, harmful, or old-wive's-tale information as medical/dental or psychological/psychiatric truth; and with any article that constitutes practice of medicine/psychology without a license - including veterinary medicine. My medical/psych training makes me cringe at all this.
Firsthand accounts of diagnoses, treatments, and their outcomes by people undergoing those treatments or by those watching their loved ones manage these conditions - and even by reporters doing in depth interviews - are good to see.
Other articles everywhere online are not very good - particularly articles written today that copy information from the APA's old DSM-IV-TR, with the writers not realizing that the DSM-5 has been active for months, then misusing, misinterpreting, or misapplying the copied information further than it's being outdated. Unfortunately, some non-credentialed pop-psych writers have set a bad precedent by completely making up additional disease titles and of trying to diagnose people. Then a portion of readers accept these writers' articles as truth and attempt to diagnose family, friends, and acquaintances - or treat themselves, with bad results. This phenomenon could make a good sit-com if people weren't being hurt by it. .
by Sherry Hewins 9 months ago
I knew it couldn't be that good forever, but I am concerned that it's Healdove that seems to be getting hit.
by Eric Standridge 5 months ago
Because I'm curious, how long, on average, do you spend on an article?
by writer83 4 years ago
Does anyone know any more sites that pay per article, and not page view, that are not scams?
by Aiden Roberts 7 years ago
When I joined Hubpages I had written a few articles, half a sitcom, a few short stories and 30,000 words of a novel.The level of expertise and craft of some hubbers leads me to believe they were accomplished writers before joining Hubpages and I was wondering.Who was a published writer before...
by Laura 4 years ago
Hello,I'm new to Hub. First a compliment. After coming off another content site, and researching others for a long, long time, it's a Godsend to come to a place that demands lengthy, quality work. I value quality articles over quantity, but here's my kicker.I want some money. I know it takes...
by Kylyssa Shay 2 years ago
Please be aware that the high-competition niches you've chosen to create new sites for will be competing with professional websites with professional writers and professional, magazine-level editors and photographers. For instance, your food niche website will need to compete with Food Network and...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|