On the share button at the bottom of each hub there is an option to share via Mixx, however whenever I attempt to do this, Mixx denies it saying it will not host these URLs.
If this is not temporary, or is not a mistake, wouldn't we be better off having another social media bookmark placed there instead?
Oli, every now and then sites like Digg or Stumble or Mixx decides to ban a revenue-sharing site because some idiot (or idiots) upset them by spamming all their articles at once. They usually get over it and remove the ban eventually.
Not saying that's definitely what's happened here but it seems likely.
by Glenn Stok5 years ago
I think it would be useful to have a column added to the statistics page that shows the total number of shares for each hub (Tweets and Facebook likes). There is not enough room to add two columns. So this could be a...
by x3xsolxdierx3x6 years ago
Hello,My name is Howie.I have done a tremendous amount of research regarding various offerings and elements of functionality/business models of the leading Web 2.0 revenue sharing websites. I've watched growth trends...
by cupid517 years ago
Can I post an article to ezinearticles which I have already published in hubpages?
by Ultimate Hubber6 years ago
What would you be doing right now??
by On The Trail6 years ago
Under 3rd party access and hubpages.com it says under host's share of revenue, "0% of content revenue." What does that mean?Thanks!JJ
by Ron Hooft6 years ago
Many people say there lives have meaning because a god exists. If no god existed life would be meaningless. So I'd like theists to explain exactly what that added value is. Is there added value by being created by a god...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.