Asking here because I got a note from an editor to fix a few things in an article, but when I clicked reply, I got a Mailer Daemon reply. So here is my question: Why are Hubpages internal links no longer allowed? I was asked to remove all of them, when it the past they were allowed.
I am now reading this: "Link Capsules are for showcasing a group of relevant and high-quality links to your readers, not for self-promoting other articles you may have written on HubPages Network Sites."
Here's the thing: I use lots of technical terms in my articles and always linked them to my other internal articles on Hubpages Network sites because they provide an in-depth explanation. If I were to explain those terms in detail (as they deserve to be so to provide a clear understanding and real-life examples), a 3,000 word article may easily double or triple.
Internal links should also help people stay longer on the website, which I think is a plus. If people enjoy reading an author's content, wouldn't they enjoy reading more on related content that provides important information that is key to the resolution of their problem? That's how I feel when I am reading content from my favorite authors. I like readers to think "Holy cow, that's right the issue I am facing now! Let me read more about it.. "Thank you, thank you, thank you!"
On a side note: I was recently invited to edit and fix a large website on Pets that needed a major makeover, and one of the requirements was to link to related internal content because it added value and kept users longer on the website. So I personally can't see any major disadvantage of using them.
OK, I must confess that I am quite picky about content and don't want people to leave the site and go searching for the meaning of unknown terms or more detailed info on how to solve a related issue that's not covered through a Google search. Sure, in a perfect world, perhaps they may stumble on an article written by a well-respected professional in the field who is on the same page when it comes to training methods, and all things flow perfectly, but why risk the chances of readers possibly stumbling upon websites that provide outdated or inaccurate information that do not match my content at all?
I prefer that the info come from me, not to self-promote, but because my content is often very specific and based on some individualized methods (sometimes, even crafted by me) that other websites do not likely not offer in such detail. My articles often connect like pieces of a puzzle, using the same training philosophies, and I think that's something that is appreciated by readers.
Since this notice was generated upon the process of moving a fresh article to a Network Site, I wonder if internal links are still allowed on Hubpages? And if so, I am wondering whether it's best to just not move the article so that readers can take advantage of the links and gain a more thorough understanding of what I am trying to convey, and therefore, a more enriching reading experience.
I would therefore appreciate some elucidations.
Internal links are allowed on niche sites and across niche sites from when I last checked. Not allowing this is crazy to say the least.
But linking from a niche site to the hubpages domain is not allowed. So if your new hub or the one you are trying to move has links pointing to a HP article, work on moving that article to a niche site first. Or write to an editor you have worked with (hubpro) and tell them that the entire series needs to be moved at once, they may comply.
OK, got it. Your response is very helpful as usual Lobobrandon. I think I missed an important point: that the articles linked to haven't moved to niche sites yet. I will double check to see if that's the case. If so, I have a lot of work to do so to get them moving.
Yup. As you already know the niche sites are the best, so it's important that you get them moved. For an established writer here and if you have many to move and they are up to the niche site standards I guess you could write to HP to get an entire batch moved. Not sure if they'd comply, but worth trying.
You also mentioned in your first post that the editor noted the use of the link capsule specifically. That could be the issue as well.
For links to your own articles HP much prefers the in-text links now. The link capsule (almost) always gets hacked by an editor when moving an article to a niche site.
I don't completely agree with the logic of that, and I certainly don't see it as "self promotion", but it's HP's field and their ground rules apply.
by Eric Dockett 24 months ago
This is getting silly. The last few Hubs I updated had all links to other Hubs snipped, even though these links were (a) on the same topic (b) helpful to the reader and (c) pointing to the same niche site. I really try to understand why Amazon links are removed, and I get why links to other sites...
by Madeleine Clays 3 weeks ago
I found a few hyperlinks in an article and I never placed them there. I broke all of them without opening them b/c I was afraid of viruses. However, it is frightening to me that these hyperlinks were somehow placed in my article by another party. Has anybody else had this problem?
by Glenn Stok 2 years ago
I noticed that hubs in niche sites no longer include the "More by this author" section below the hub. Is this just an oversight or was it a decision to drop it on niche sites?
by Dina Sostarec 10 days ago
Hi,Do more experienced Hubbers have any useful tips for getting your article moved to a niche site? I kept seeing advice that goes something like "make sure you write a high-quality article" but it just seems so vague to me. I have 9 articles now and the only one that was moved to a niche...
by Samantha Cubbison 11 months ago
We would like to address the collective concern regarding the “Recommended” content that has started to show up on article pages. This is a brand new technology, personalized to each individual to drive engagement. Due to a bug, there has been unwanted content popping up for some of you. Your...
by Silver Rose 8 years ago
Here's a post from googlewebmastercentral posted yesterday:http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot. … ernal.htmlLook at the table where they show the differences. Previously scholar.google.com/ and sketchup.google.com/ were external links, now they are internal links.It's probably a response...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|