Do you go through old articles and submit them to niche sites?

Jump to Last Post 1-8 of 8 discussions (53 posts)
  1. NateB11 profile image91
    NateB11posted 2 months ago

    I understand there's no reason to submit new articles to niche sites because staff get to those first, but I'm debating whether to go through my old articles to submit them. Is this something anyone here does with success?

    1. PaulGoodman67 profile image96
      PaulGoodman67posted 2 months agoin reply to this

      I've done it many times, with a low success rate. Unless you know specifically why they were originally rejected, it's difficult. I have a number of rejected articles which I see as essentially similar to hosted ones. Some of them I've worked on a few times and submitted without success. Of course, it sometimes does work out, but it's painful putting in lots of effort and getting knocked back. If you are told that you need to change a, b, and c to get it accepted, that's a different matter.

      1. samanthacubbison profile imageSTAFF
        samanthacubbisonposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        @PaulGoodman67,

        I understand that it's frustrating when a reason isn't given for rejection. Like you said, it's difficult to know what to change. As you probably already know, you can always post in the forums for advice (and I'd be happy to chime in) or email the team for more general questions about the requirements/preferences of a specific niche site.

      2. Miebakagh57 profile image44
        Miebakagh57posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

        I can see the pointers in that. It is like a hint and you get directions. And you arrived without or with a little headache.

    2. samanthacubbison profile imageSTAFF
      samanthacubbisonposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Hi @NateB11,

      I would only suggest submitting older articles if you have made changes to them since they last went through the process. I see this once in a while and I usually accept those that have been updated.

      1. NateB11 profile image91
        NateB11posted 2 months agoin reply to this

        Okay, thanks, Samantha. Good to know.

      2. hclpd profile image95
        hclpdposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        Ahan. I've had mixed success doing that with Reelrundown. Levelskip has been the best for me so far, with almost all of my pieces getting admitted as soon as they are published.

        I'll try to make some changes and start submitting olderer articles to Reelrundown once again.

      3. Miebakagh57 profile image44
        Miebakagh57posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

        Many thanks, Samantha Cubbison.

      4. Miebakagh57 profile image44
        Miebakagh57posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

        Thank you, Sumantha Cubbison. Lets say I updated three different old articles in a day. A day or two later, I noted them featured. Can these three different articles be submit to niche sites one after the other the same day? Thanks again.

        1. theraggededge profile image98
          theraggededgeposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

          People have already explained on the other thread. Only one article can be submitted every 14 days.

          1. Miebakagh57 profile image44
            Miebakagh57posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

            Bev, noted and thanks.

    3. OldRoses profile image99
      OldRosesposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      It took a couple of years, but I rewrote and submitted all of my old articles to the niche sites.  When I took a hard look at my old articles, I could immediately see why they were initially rejected and rewrote them accordingly.  It was a lot of time and effort but very worth it.  I am reaping the financial rewards now.

      1. NateB11 profile image91
        NateB11posted 2 months agoin reply to this

        That's encouraging. I'll have to take a look at my old articles, see what I can do.

        1. Solaras profile image97
          Solarasposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

          Slightly different topic, but my old number one article had gone from 600 views a day down to 190 daily views, while sitting on the niche site (Pethelpful).  I went back and re optimized for my original topic.  People were using new longtail keyword searches, and an editor had removed the main word I had optimized the article for.

          Also I have found adding bulleted lists helps improve ranking and pageviews. It improves your chances of being one of the answers to the Google questions (I don't know the tech term for the list of questions Google offers up responses to)

          It took about 2 months for Google to appreciate my efforts.  Now it is back to being my number one article with 900-1200 pageviews a day, depending on the day of the week. As Old Roses notes, there is value in reworking an old article.

          1. DrMark1961 profile image99
            DrMark1961posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

            Have you found that you can reoptimize articles that never have done that well and still expect a good response? I have edited some of my poorly performing articles numerous times and never see much change. Do you think it matters where in the article the list is placed? (First capsule, or can it be further down?)
            For instance in this article https://pethelpful.com/dogs/Fireworks-a … g-Your-Dog I present what I consider the best method first, but then include all of the other alternative training methods that I am aware of.

            1. Marisa Writes profile image94
              Marisa Writesposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

              What edits have you tried?  Have you researched frequently-searched titles?

              Google is more likely to pick up a bulleted list if it's near the top of the article.  Also make it a bulleted list rather than a series of longer paragraphs with bullets.  I usually start the article with a summary in bullet points, then if I want to give a longer explanation for each one, then I'll do that later in the article. 

              Here's the bulleted list that Google picks up for  dogs and fireworks:
              https://www.rspca.org.uk/adviceandwelfa … fireworks.

              Note how succinct it is.

              You don't have a video in that Hub - it's always worth seeking one out and adding it.  If you can add some words to encourage readers to watch it, even better.  Watching a video keeps your reader on the page longer, which is a good thing.

              By the way, I notice the RSPCA site has a nice infographic which you're allowed to use.   I suggest putting it at the end of the Hub, assuming you agree with their advice.  Don't use the code - just post it as an image and give them a link. They're a good neighbourhood to link to.

              1. DrMark1961 profile image99
                DrMark1961posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

                Thanks for your help. I did not think that RSPCA infographic was appropriate for my article but I did put the bullet list first instead of further down the page and I also added a dog music video from Youtube.
                I am not sure how popular this might be (not sure it is searched a lot) but maybe these changes will be beneficial.

            2. Solaras profile image97
              Solarasposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

              I think, as long as the title of the capsule asks or states the answer to a Google frequently asked question, the bulleted list can be the last capsule on the page. 

              Other "lists" can be created by google, by bolding the first word in a paragraph: Thundershirts ( in bold then more about thundershirts in the rest of the paragraph), Loud Classical Music (in Bold and more about how that drowns out noise), Pheromones (in bold etc)... Google will ferret out the list from the bold words, which is useful if you don't want to rewrite your article entirely, and if that suits your original article better.

              I have had 50% success with reworking old articles this way. Some still malinger, while others have taken off after years and years of 30 views a day.  One of those is now 450 views a day. I am assuming the age of the article + updating the content into a format google finds easy to parse helped it jump in page views. 

              Reworking an article that was once #1-3 in Serps, but fell off a cliff, is the most successful, in my experience.  And you have to be patient before you know if it worked, 2-3 months should tell you if your changes had any effect.

              1. DrMark1961 profile image99
                DrMark1961posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

                Thanks for all of that info. I went ahead and put that bullet list up higher, added a MFP image, deleted an Amazon link, and added a video to see if it improves at all, but am not real hopeful since it was already on the first page and still gets horrible traffic. It never was the top of the SERPs as you mentioned with your other article.

                1. Solaras profile image97
                  Solarasposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

                  One problem is that fireworks is pretty much seasonal in the USA. This is an issue for us just around New Years and the Fourth of July. 

                  You could add thunder, which causes similar symptoms of noise induced shaking, drooling etc.. That would be more of a year round search term. 

                  Longtail keywords searches are the same for Dog Scared of "Thunder" "Fireworks" Shaking.

                  Dog "Storm" "Fireworks" Anxiety

                  And maybe a capsule on what happens to your dog physiologically when it gets into this fear response.

          2. NateB11 profile image91
            NateB11posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

            Okay, wow, good to know. Definitely going to go through my articles, see what I can do.

        2. Miebakagh57 profile image44
          Miebakagh57posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

          Copying that.

    4. Sherry Hewins profile image95
      Sherry Hewinsposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      I used to do it, but now I have already had almost all of my articles moved. I feel like I have a pretty good idea what the niche sites are looking for, and I don't feel that any of the few I have remaining on HP would be accepted.

      I tried a couple of them that I had doubts about, and sure enough, they were rejected, so I no longer bother submitting them unless I have recently made major edits.

    5. EricFarmer8x profile image96
      EricFarmer8xposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

      I have had a better time writing new content instead of fixing old content. Right now all my hubs are on niche websites. But this is because I only move onto new hubs once they are accepted.

      I had a few issues with some older hubs and I eventually moved on or got rid of them. I also tested some new hub ideas and they did not work out as I wanted. Got rid of those as well.

      I think some of your hubs could be moved. I would take a look at what hubs are doing OK now and see if you can move those ones.

    6. Miebakagh57 profile image44
      Miebakagh57posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

      It was a coincidence that I just post a aptly related topic moments ago. Minds are universal?

  2. Rupert Taylor profile image98
    Rupert Taylorposted 2 months ago

    My experience is that 90 percent of articles written pre-niche sites are moved onto platforms such as Owlcation and Soapboxie after I submit them. It might be that those niches are where most of my work goes and I have developed a good rapport with the editors there. It's when I stray outside those two niches that I get rejections.

    1. NateB11 profile image91
      NateB11posted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Okay, good to know. Sounds like from responses here that it can be difficult with a lot of the niche sites to get articles accepted. I'll have to see what kind of edits I can do, looks like, if I'm expecting to successfully getting any articles moved.

      Edit: Although it's interesting I think I have some old articles that could qualify for those niche sites you mentioned that accepted your articles.

    2. Miebakagh57 profile image44
      Miebakagh57posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

      Hi Rupert, you have said it well. Well, I can inferred that you may by now knew some requirement of these two niche sites?      Seriously, can you tell us a thing or two? Even more? Thanks.

  3. Marisa Writes profile image94
    Marisa Writesposted 2 months ago

    When I started this new account, only about half of my Hubs were moved initially, so I had to manually submit the rest.  I simply expanded them a bit.  Most got accepted.  For the couple that were rejected, I received the usual generic email BUT it had some very specific advice in the last paragraph, which I will follow when I get around to resubmitting!   

    I have a handful of others which I didn't submit because I don't think they'd be accepted.

  4. FatFreddysCat profile image98
    FatFreddysCatposted 7 weeks ago

    Every so often I go thru my old articles that are still moldering away on HubPages and do some updating/tweaking so that they'll (hopefully) get beamed up to a niche site. It's been a slow process but the pile is getting smaller, I'm starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel.

    ...of course, not every one of them does make the journey to a niche, even if I update them, and I've found others that are just too outdated to be of any use, so I've unpublished a fair share of those oldies and put them out of their misery.

  5. Shesabutterfly profile image97
    Shesabutterflyposted 7 weeks ago

    I stopped trying to get my articles to a niche site about a year ago or so. I was suppose to have an article in the que on Pethelpful, but it has been two years and I highly doubt anything is going to come of it despite being told several times it was going to be moved.

    Most of the ones I have left to move need to be majorly reworked and I'm honestly not interested in putting in the work at this time. Especially when all we get is a generic rejection letter. I've reworked several of those articles with no luck so I have given up. I will eventually delete them all and just submit new articles, as those seem to move over better.

    1. Marisa Writes profile image94
      Marisa Writesposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

      I have never received just a generic rejection letter.  Yes, there is always the standard wording - but the last paragraph usually has specific pointers to improve, and if you can fix those, you can resubmit and there's a good chance it will be accepted.

      If there is nothing specific in the last paragraph then the scope of improvements needed was too great.

      1. Shesabutterfly profile image97
        Shesabutterflyposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

        I have not found that to be true. The last paragraph was the same for all the generic e-mails. "You are welcome to rework this article and submit it for re-review in 60 days, but please keep in mind that the topical issues above can be difficult to fix. Your effort may be better spent publishing a new article, or submitting a different one for Owlcation after the 14-day wait period."

        The only time I got something specific was if the editor actually emailed me which was few and far between. Not to mention half the time the bullet points of the email did not apply to my article.

        I eventually was able to get some of the articles moved. Some I only did one edit, and others I had to do several rewrites so I'm not sure what exactly needed to be changed (since they all needed different degrees of edits), but some of them where finally accepted. It would have been a lot easier if I would have known exactly what they where looking for considering some of them I didn't change much and they were accepted the second time around.

    2. NateB11 profile image91
      NateB11posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

      Come to think of it I remember an article they emailed me about saying it could be moved to a niche site if I did x, y, and z. I did what I could and I haven't heard back in years. Maybe I'll try again, but I'm with you, if something's more trouble than it's worth I start thinking of easier alternatives.

      1. NateB11 profile image91
        NateB11posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

        What's very funny about that particular article is the editor wanted me to make it more about my personal experience on the subject matter and that article was nothing but my personal experience on that matter. It's something I have decades of experience with. C'est la vie.

        1. Marisa Writes profile image94
          Marisa Writesposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

          That may well be, but I'd say they were asking you to make that clearer in the way you phrased it.  If you just stated the facts without relating it to examples from your own experience, then it could just as easily sound like you read it in a textbook.

          1. NateB11 profile image91
            NateB11posted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

            Like I said, more trouble than it's worth. I'll probably go the Paradigmsearch route on that one. big_smile

            1. Marisa Writes profile image94
              Marisa Writesposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

              Your choice, but it might need only a sentence or two.

      2. Marisa Writes profile image94
        Marisa Writesposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

        The email is somewhat misleading.  They don't keep an eye on the Hub, so that when you do x, y and z, they'll move it.  You need to do x, y and z and then submit it again.

  6. Marisa Writes profile image94
    Marisa Writesposted 7 weeks ago

    I did mention that if there isn't a specific last paragraph, that means there are too many issues that need addressing (in their opinion).   You'll only get that final paragraph - or a separate email - if there are just a few, clearly defined, issues that can be quickly explained.

    Worth bearing in mind that if you're submitting an article that's already been on the old site for a long time and hasn't done well, the company isn't going to invest staff time and money to help you fix it.   They have a long queue of new articles constantly arriving and that's their priority.

    1. Shesabutterfly profile image97
      Shesabutterflyposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

      I have not found that to be the case though. I did mention I had articles with all different degrees of edits needed, denied with that same generic e-mail. I have been able to get several moved after only a few tweaks on multiple occasions (this was many years ago though). I think it really depended on who happened across the article in the que honestly. All the articles I submitted were on HP for a long time as I've been here for many years prior to the niche sites, but they were ones that saw traffic. I wasn't trying to put zero traffic articles on the niche sites.

      If I'm only updating photo's or taking out a few choice words (both examples I've done in the past with the generic reject e-mail), there is no reason to not explain that. It would have saved me and the editors more time in the long run. Maybe I'm in the minority, but I have never had much luck transfering articles, or talking with editors.

  7. daydreams profile image98
    daydreamsposted 6 weeks ago

    I did this a few years ago - but the ones I have remaining I have just given up on - I have submitted a couple and got enough feedback to know the problem, but I just don't think it's worth the effort I would need to make to get up to scratch.
    I think it's worth considering how much potential they have to get traffic if moved. For example there was one I updated and got accepted to a niche site but topic is something that hardly anyone ever googles so not really worth it.

    1. Miebakagh57 profile image44
      Miebakagh57posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

      Okay. I'll try and see results and I'm determined not to give up.

    2. NateB11 profile image91
      NateB11posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

      I think I know what you mean, there are already some articles I'm considering not submitting to niche sites.

  8. Miebakagh57 profile image44
    Miebakagh57posted 6 weeks ago

    Can you tell us why? The thread has been of much interest to me, and is educating. Thanks.

    1. NateB11 profile image91
      NateB11posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

      One that I'm considering not submitting to a niche site is an opinion piece which notoriously do badly in terms of traffic and are more or less frowned upon. It's unfortunate in many ways, but it's a fact.

      1. Miebakagh57 profile image44
        Miebakagh57posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

        Good to note. And thanks.

      2. Solaras profile image97
        Solarasposted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

        My sense is that opinion pieces do well on Medium.com  If it is evergreen, you might experiment over there.

        1. Marisa Writes profile image94
          Marisa Writesposted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

          I agree.

          1. Miebakagh57 profile image44
            Miebakagh57posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

            Medium.com? I'll give it a try. And thanks.

        2. Miebakagh57 profile image44
          Miebakagh57posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

          Medium.com? Will give it a try later.

          1. Marisa Writes profile image94
            Marisa Writesposted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

            Medium requires a very high standard of fluent English, and very few non-native speakers are able to achieve that.

            1. Miebakagh57 profile image44
              Miebakagh57posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

              Good to know. Will do and so.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)