I've gotten to the stage where I am getting a little worried about my online work disappearing or HP being taken down (I love it here, and as unlikely or as pessimistic as it may sound, it happens).
I know many of you would advocate backing up offline, and its a habit I should've gotten into earlier, but I was wondering whether a way for authors to export their articles offline could ever be considered?
Almost all browsers have a Save As Web Page option that will save the HTML and the pictures and everything else to files on your machine. Firefox, Chrome, Safari, maybe even IE.
You can then do File, Open and admire your work whenever you wish.
I suggest that you check out the option - available in IE, Opera (and Firefox with an extension) - to save your hub as a "web archive" (.shs). This creates a single file with images, links and everything intact.
Thanks for the help, I'll look into that as well.
An important difference between the Web Archive format and the Save As Web Page Complete is that the Archive does NOT save images - it references them at their original source.
Whether that is good or bad depends on what you want, if course.
It also means that you can do File Open on a saved file and see it exactly as it was when you saved it whether or not the web version still exists. It is also much easier to move the page elsewhere as you have the images right there.
Of course it takes up more space and saves images you probably don't care about.
PC Unix, what you are saying differs from my understanding of Web Archives; indeed images appear to be embedded into the file itself. Right-click on any image, check properties, and you will see that the location is the local drive. The article referenced below also appears to support this understanding.
Links within images (such as your profile picture, for instance, which links to your HubPages profile) will still work interactively, meaning that if the source changes these links may no longer be operable.
Well, I just did a grep of "img src" and it showed them pointing to the source. When I "Inspect Elenent" it shows the sane thing.
Possibly it is because I am using Safari on a Mac? Maybe IE works like Web Page Complete does?
That's the problem with browsers - you can't tryst 'em!
But -even if they were imbedded - the Web Oage Complete has them as easily visible files that you can manipulate by themselves.
I just checked that Wikipedia and it says what you said.
I used Safari to save a hub and then opened it with Safari, right clicked on an image nd asked to open that and it took me back to HubPages.
If I do that with Chrome and its Web Page Complete Save, it takes me to a local file on my drive.
I just recently made copies of all my hubs at google docs pics and all showed up. (Not shared).
was this a good idea?
I understood the information at Google Docs to mean that as long as documents are not shared (or only shared via a private link), they will not show up in the search engines. If your hubs did show up, I would be surprised.
Is this a good place to store docs. i do not really have a pc per se.
Sure, why not use Google Docs? They recently improved their file storage mechanisms.
But I recommend that you create the Web Archive files that I mentioned above, then upload these to Google Docs. Clear the box that asks whether you want to convert the files to the Google Docs format. This way you will have a copy that is about as close to the original article as possible. You can even put several of the Web Archives into a zip file to make the job easier.
The article I referenced does seem to suggest the format is not universally compatible across all browsers. Working with IE and Opera it is my impression that these images are stored and handled locally within a single file.
Guys - write it in an off-line text editor and paste it in to hubpages when it is finished. Then do not throw your copy away.
by Sondra Rochelle2 years ago
Janderson posted something really important yesterday which I think everybody here needs to read http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/132621#post2759379.If he is correct in his assumptions (which it appears he might...
by Kate Swanson4 months ago
I wish the editors would stop telling people to post on the forums to get their work proof-read!Most Hubbers are very happy to read an article and offer advice on how to improve it - we've done that for years. We...
by Kylyssa Shay2 years ago
A few of my hubs have been copied by a site hosted by GoDaddy. I looked up their page about copyright infringement and something about the DMCA wording and the way that the counter notice was worded made me a little...
by CarlySullens3 years ago
Recently, there was a thread of someone complaining about Hub of the Days lacking amazing writing skills. Their complaint stated the Hubs being selected were because they were niche driven and 'how too's' instead...
by Dr. John Anderson6 years ago
The new layout explodes the prominence of the related hubs images down the right side of the page. This image appears before all the ads, apart from the Google adsense ad above the title. Related hubs get an absolutely...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.