67.14 + 0.01011 is the regression equation, where x is the word count, and y is the "Hubscore", for my hubs. The coefficient of determination is 0.582, which basically means that 1/3 of the factoring of Hubscores can be accounted for by word length.
I am not sure what you are expressing here. I don't think the two are related. The hub score and the word length are unique and separate entities that do not intersect.
Numbers do not lie, and 34% of the variation in MY Hubscores' are related to word length. Correlation does not mean causation. It could very well be that I devote more effort out of interest, so the inherent quality of my hub, the word count, and the Hubscore could be co-related. It is fun to me, playing around with different metrics.
Unfortunately, numbers do lie. As you point out, correlation does not mean causation and the attempt to do an analysis on only seven points of data is almost certain to fail. You may indeed find a correlation, but it is just as likely to be coincidence as causation or any other relation.
Do you mean "number of words"? There's a difference between that and "word length". (No offense, I'm assuming English may be your second language. There's nothing wrong with that. It's just that your question is not really clear to a reader.)
Darn it. I screwed this up by omitting an x. It should read:
Hubscore = 67.14 + 0.01011x
Wouldn't it be even better as y = 67.14 + 0.01011x, since your original post said "y is the 'Hubscore' for my hubs"?
That is arguable, but either way, people do often lie by using numbers, and people often deceive themselves with numbers, and people have been known to focus on the wrong numbers.
There is nothing wrong with your enjoyment of these metrics - enjoy away! But only you can evaluate whether this enjoyment of metrics is the best use of your time in the long run.
I thought you quit because you considered your inability to make thousands of dollars from a handful of mediocre hubs proved the inviability of hubpages.
And re the hubscores? I don't think anyone cares. Since hubscores have absolutely no impact on whether you make money here, I ignore them.
Sullen, I hope you didn't put a lot of mental effort in that equation, because it was just a lot of effort over something that was basically meaningless. Write some decent hubs, as long as your hubber score is over 75, you'll be able to attract people and build a base.
You've only been here three months and wrote only 7 hubs, you're not going to do much with that.
That's the thing. If Sullen had another few Hubs may his score would go up without all that trying to figure out what goes into a high score. It's not all that complicated - write and make the Hubs reasonably decent. Getting a score into the 90's isn't very hard if someone just puts in a little effort on coming up with some decent-enough Hubs. Besides, there's point in anyone spinning his wheels over the author score, because it can from 100 to 95 to 98 and back to 96, all in a matter of a few days.
Notice how there's nearly a 3 month gap between the date of first publication and my last 6 publications (i.e. notice how I've only "been here" 10 days).
Well, there you go.... Just hang around a little while longer, and write some more stuff. Really.... people who have been around here for a couple of years or longer will tell you - there's not really any need to spend time focusing on the HubScore (as long as it's over 75 and, hopefully, quite a bit above that 75). To get earnings you need traffic. To get traffic you need to write Hubs that will attract it and use the SEO basics. To get a higher Hub score you just need to write reasonably decent stuff (and maybe read and comment on some people's Hubs, as far as participation goes).
I have 1200 word hubs with the same hub score as my 2500 word hubscores that have the same score as my 4,000 word hubs. Not sure that simple "equation" is going to help you.
There are a lot of possible explanations for your argument against a valid relationship between word count and hubscore.
For example, the most anomalous hub in the context of my analysis is the 899 word, 87 score "The definitive..." hub. My theory is that the 1927 word, 87 score "The art of taking MC tests" is causing noise with the hub, due to the fact that it is grouped together with it, through a nifty link at the bottom of the page.
I could be totally wrong, but only time and numbers will tell the true story.
My Hub score is now 93, but it goes up and down all the time. My hubs are around 550-800 words and a few over 1000 words. I think having a word count around 600 or so is fine, but that is my opinion only. I may be wrong about that. Write some more Hubs and things should get better.
I try to write a new hub at least one every two days. I have 41 now in 7 weeks.
by Janellegems 22 months ago
I am sort of disappointed. I try to be active in the site as much as possible, comment on other people's hubs, help out in the forums, add new hubs once every two weeks, participate in the question and answer and my hubscore is slowly decreasing. Any advice from expert Hubbers on how to...
by Richieb799 8 years ago
I have strived over the last 5 weeks to produce as many hubs as i can but to a high quality. I heard at first that if go around serial 'following' this can penalise your hubscoreI added a few people but then cut down when i heard this. I only follow about 12 people.i just noticed someone who has 25...
by Missing Link 7 years ago
I have read how hubscore is computed but was still surprised the other day when I saw a hubscore of 1. It just is somewhat amazing to me that some hubscores are 10 or below. Don't get me wrong----I'm really not trying to be judgemental or holier than thou or anything it's just I...
by ss sneh 7 years ago
What is the relationship between a hub score and traffic to that hub?
by Kylyssa Shay 3 years ago
Yesterday I published a brand new hub. It had no hubscore when I went to bed last night. I was pleased to see it had a very nice hubscore this morning. I went to look at the hub itself and saw a minor typo that I fixed. Just a few minutes ago, while looking for low-ranking hubs to edit, there it...
by Katherine Tyrrell 3 years ago
Which way do you think your Hubscores will go with the NEW change to the Hubscore algorithm? See "An Update to HubScore" http://blog.hubpages.com/2015/02/26/an- … -hubscore/Note that the revision will:* deemphasise traffic - from all sources* put more of an emphasis on quality as...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|