He is there performing now. His voice is not the same as it was even a few years ago.
...ack!...PM has sucked for a long time anyway....he was best when he was with the beattles....not 'band with the runs stuff'......sorry LCS.......
No apology needed. I enjoy most of his music, but not for everyone, which is cool.
Too bad- missed it. It would have been fun to watch.
Well, Paul is getting up there...the voice goes with age.
along with everything else
by AnnCee 12 years ago
McCartney's tears for ObamaSir Paul McCartney fought back tears as he and Stevie Wonder sang Ebony And Ivory for U.S. president, Barack Obama - because he was so proud to be performing for the country's first black leader.The Beatles star was honoured at the White House earlier this month,...
by BRENDA ARLEDGE 16 months ago
We went away for the evening to attend a tribute to Paul McCartney.Luckily we made it. I was a bit concerned with my health issues, but this was something we had already planned.I hope to see ya all in between football games tomorrow...after we get back.It was a wonderful night of the Beatles...
by Susan Reid 11 years ago
He earns a prominent award and does a cozy gig for the first family and invited guests. It's a feel-good all around.Can't imagine anyone finding fault with this ... but if you do, bring it....Paul McCartney, pals serenade Obamas at White House"Paul McCartney: The Library of Congress...
by Stacie L 11 years ago
Paul McCartney to marry in Town Hall in LondonBy Ann Oldenburg, USA TODAYPaul McCartney plans to tie the knot for the third time in the same place where he wed wife Linda more than 40 years ago.Officials said Friday that McCartney and fiancee Nancy Shevell have posted a notice of intention to marry...
by KFlippin 12 years ago
Paul McCartney - how sick, how sad, how unbelievable, his crappy slur to Bush and to Laura on his high night in the White House. Not to mention Obama has all this time for entertainment right now? If it were Bush or any other Republican President he, or she, would be attacked like a...
by BritishRock 12 years ago
Both were singers and gutarists for The Beatles but which one had the better solo career? John wrote about War, Love and Peace. Paul has had a longer solo career but has he made the same amount of classics as John did? Personally I like John Lennons music over Pauls. I welcome everyones opnion.
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|