I'd like feedback on my article: Paul Mccartney Collaborates With Ai Voice of...

1. 42

   paulnprovposted 2 years ago

   Hi Hubbers,
   
   I'd like some help with passing the Quality Assessment Process. Will you please give feedback on my article? What can I do to improve? Thanks!
   Here is my article: Paul Mccartney Collaborates With Ai Voice of John Lennon: Exploring the Moral Aspects

   replyreport
   1. 78

      WriterJanisposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Paul,
      A really interesting article. I see where you fixed the C, but you still have a lower case I in both your title and throughout your article. I would change these to a capital I. The section: John Lennon Disapproves of A.i. Reincarnation really doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
      I understand you are using AI images, but I believe the images should still be credited.
      Once last thing. Some of your paragraphs are quite long. You might want to break them up a bit. This is due to so many people reading articles on their phones these days.

      replyreport
2. 65

   psycheskinnerposted 2 years ago

   I would suggest correcting the title to "AI" or "A.I."
   
   I would suggest that the title "John Lennon Does Not Approve Of AI Reincarnation" should be changed to "AI reincarnation without John Lennon's approval" to reflect missing approval rather than disapproval.
   
   I would also suggest that using AI art in an article that opposes AI music is ... inconsistent? Each picture is derived from the work of artists who did not give their approval for it to be used in this way.

   replyreport
   1. 42

      paulnprovposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you for your input. The article doesn't include my opinion, but my opinion on what John Would think. I do get your point, however. Since this is AI these are likenesses, not actual photographs. It represents them, but is not them. There is some forgiveness in rendering. I believe. Once again, I really do appreciate the input!

      replyreport
3. 92

   AliciaCposted 2 years ago

   Psycheskinner has given you  excellent advice. When you’re correcting the title, you should also correct the last name of the singer.

   replyreport
   1. 42

      paulnprovposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I did notice the mistake in the name and I fixed it, but it was back when I did some editing and I didn't notice it went back to the lower case C. Thank you for responding!!

      replyreport
4. 42

   paulnprovposted 2 years ago

   I created the AI images in Leonardo AI. They are considered legally mine.
   I'm not sure if the title: John Lennon Disapproves of A.i. Reincarnation" or what he says in the video doesn't make sense? The last sentence is "Damn Walrus" which, if you remember, was what Paul was called. Anyway, thanks for your input!! I separated the paragraphs. If this doesn't work I'll try taking that video down. Thanks again

   replyreport
5. 83

   theraggededgeposted 2 years ago

   Hi Paul, you asked for help in passing QAP. Can I suggest that you take the advice given by experienced HP writers instead of arguing against it? It will help you get your article featured. If you want to change things back later, then you can do that.
   
   Image sources should always be cited even when they are your own. You could say, 'Image created by author' using AI'.

   replyreport
   1. 42

      paulnprovposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I did take their advice and thanked them. Also, I did not argue, but pointed out things that needed to be addressed. It's called communication.
      
      Why would you see it as arguing?

      replyreport
      1. 83

         theraggededgeposted 2 years agoin reply to this

         Because you negated several points offered and, at the time I posted, you'd not implemented any of the advice. I see you've changed the article now.
         
         I was not trying to dis you but explain why you need to make those necessary alterations in order to pass the Quality Assessment.
         
         I hope your article is featured soon.
         
         Edit: You have two orphan subheadings at the end.

         replyreport
         1. 42

            paulnprovposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Thank you!

            replyreport
6. 65

   psycheskinnerposted 2 years ago

   My point about the AI is not that the depicted person might not approve, but that the artists whose work is used to create the images did not consent.  Just as Lennon didn't.  The AI uses the work of real visual artists just like it used Lennon's demo track.

   replyreport
7. 42

   paulnprovposted 2 years ago

   It's a slippery slope, for sure. AI uses multiple sources and puts its own spin. You make valid points and I struggle some. Paul McCartney stands to make millions, while I might make spare change. I could justify this more with some more mental gymnastics, but I won't. I can live with my crimes and move on because AI is just going to grow and I will go along as long as no one gets hurt or blatantly ripped off.

   replyreport