|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Since once again, comment moderation involves skipping my questions at the blog - and as someone who theorized about the subdomain concept ...
You Got To Be kidding me!
if HP switches to authors as subdomains ... wow.
That would make most of the "quality" and commercial changes pointless and accepted as such. All the writers and time lost would be for nothing.
The witch hunts here would have been a waste of time as those "authors" (now gone) could have been stuck in their own walled subdomain
If they were to follow a subdomain model the smart choice would be topical. Did you create your author name with the intention of it being a part of your URL?
On first read, it seemed like a great idea ( I even volunteered) .. but a few seconds later, I think it would invalidate all the careful selection of short urls. Hell, my profile name is rather short .. I would feel bad for websiteexaminer.hubpages.com/myhubstitle
Its to random , it would have to be by topic finance/humor/hosting(lol)/Writing etc
While topical sounds sensible, it probably is not here because there would be so much repetition within the topic.
Separation by authors has the advantage of separating the wheat from the chaff.
Whether that is enough, who knows?
You dont think as a(nother) backwards compat site change that it disregards the original intention and designs of thousands of authors?
It creates problems such as self competition, longer urls , general confusion in past marketing campaigns (even with redirects)
Im willing to be wheat or chaff on my own -but then what good was rel=author and months of twitchy changes.
eh -- it doesnt matter , but it really seems like if this was an idea it should have been done first before all the other tweaks.
Its a HUGE gamble and definitely invalidates alot of peoples idea of what they thought they were getting involved in here
Im going to wander away again now - I think subdomains are a great idea for new sites using a multi author topic / concept. Massacring the site architecture here ..yet again, sounds damn scary. You got to a pick a course and follow through on it! If its going to be quality non commercial content and mass axing of authors - do it and see what happens, dont make changes that invalidate all that was done before.
..in regards to: http://blog.hubpages.com/2011/06/prepar … ess-panda/
I'll probably read all of this, but it would help to put all comments here http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/77245 looking for official feedback.
by Paul Edmondson2 years ago
Hi Hubbers,We are making some significant site structure changes. http://blog.hubpages.com/2015/10/24/lik … new-again/Please report any issues you find.http://hubpages.com/autosHappy Hubbing,Paul
by Paul Edmondson6 years ago
Today we are putting a few staff accounts on Subdomains. This is a pretty major change to the site that we've been working hard to get out as fast as possible. You can see an example at (In the next hour or...
by jubiladay6 years ago
Here's something interesting for those of you wary of sharing your personal data & stats with other users.Each of our personal subdomains is now displayed on quantcast. Case in point: Paul Edmondson's page...
by Melanie Shebel4 years ago
http://www.pinterest.com/source/hubpages.com/Looks like there are no hubs on Pinterest (I noticed no Pinterest traffic today and had to investigate.)Hubs are no longer pinnable.I wish hubbers wouldn't spam social...
by Will Apse4 years ago
In his hub 'What We Don't Know About Google Panda?', Paul Edmondson points out that Google seems to expect sites to leap high above any bar that might reasonably be set for quality purposes.Paul seems less than happy...
by Paul Goodman6 years ago
Article for discussion. I know that this recent development has already been mentioned by some hubbers in forums. But I am now wondering if this might be the main reason why we are seeing the current traffic...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.