Thoughts on how things might be changing

Jump to Last Post 1-12 of 12 discussions (21 posts)
  1. 2uesday profile image65
    2uesdayposted 12 years ago

    I wonder if one of the reasons visual pin boards are so popular is that some people cannot be bothered to spend long on one page. They like images and cannot be bothered to read text unless they actively searching for information.

    In which case, I am left wondering what does the future look like for on-line writers and the web pages? Are pin boards to writing what fast food chains are to a carefully prepared meal? Maybe people like to graze rather than feast.

    1. Will Apse profile image89
      Will Apseposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      View duration suggests that some people really do read from beginning to end.

    2. prettydarkhorse profile image62
      prettydarkhorseposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      I just think that most people are more visual. If the photos are controversial, beautiful, extreme depiction of realities, the more it will catch the eye. We have short attention span and most people just look at the headlines, photos and read the captions that go with it.

      But for those who are really interested in one subject area and it is educational for them, I think they will read it thoroughly.

  2. CMHypno profile image81
    CMHypnoposted 12 years ago

    I think that it is possibly one of the side effects of the internet, after all why read a long book or article when you can get information in bite size chunks?  It has long term implications on how people think and process information, and the ability to concentrate on one task for lengthy periods could be one of the casualties.

    Not particularly good news for those of us who want to write, and are not that interested in sticking pretty pictures on a board.  Are good writers losing out to those who are good at visuals?

  3. profile image0
    kelleywardposted 12 years ago

    I think what you are suggesting is a real possibility. However, there are still lots of people who do look to the internet to learn more about issues, buying guides, etc. Maybe we online writers need to look for ways we can learn to use visual pictures as a way to keep the reader interested in what we are trying to say. Your question is an interesting concept to consider.

  4. Polly C profile image89
    Polly Cposted 12 years ago

    I think that people still read text if it is the information they are looking for. I do. However, I also search images first sometimes, usually to help me locate the 'right' article more quickly, if that makes sense. Travel, for instance - I want an article but I want a lot of images too.

  5. Mark Ewbie profile image81
    Mark Ewbieposted 12 years ago

    Few random thoughts..

    Facebook just bought Instagram for one billion.
    HP redesign puts emphasis on pictures.
    Pinterest is very popular.
    Lolcats and Youtube generate massive traffic.

    As yet Google 'reads' text for it's search engine.  I wonder if it could ever 'read' a picture and determine what it is about, whether it's funny, sad, etc and use that for indexing?

    My stuff is amateur ego centric garbage with no idea about marketing, sales and so on. So I can't offer an 'expert' opinion on traffic.  But I certainly have put as much, if not more, effort into pictures as text over the last few months.

    Reasons being -

    - images get indexed and generate some search traffic.

    - people preview or scan pages first - get those ads out of the way and offer something interesting / attractive / different to look at.

    - I like the text and image pages on the net, rather than just text.

  6. 2uesday profile image65
    2uesdayposted 12 years ago

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this. I think it is a real challenge to keep up with what is wanted by readers or 'viewers'.

    This first became interesting to me when I began to think about the different ways different age groups approach using the internet and communicating.

    The younger users have never known a world where they could not keep in touch constantly. They have never had to go into town to the library to do research when they want information. They are constantly able to communicate with one another. All of this must be changing the way that over the years that we think, interpret and use the information in the things we read or view. Now you can always re-access the information so there is no need to read it and remember the information in the same way. Which would lead to spending less time reading.

    Pin boards could also be a way of 'virtually owning something' rather than actually buying it.

    I have always liked making my pages look good when building them. I think the thing for me now is to find a balance between the quantity of words and images and trying to make both appealing.

    1. lobobrandon profile image90
      lobobrandonposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Yup I back your statement about libraries for research - I've never done it and I've always used the internet to get all the info I needed.

    2. Sally's Trove profile image78
      Sally's Troveposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      One of HP's features that could be a powerful tool in encouraging short-attention-span readers is the photo slide show. Not too long ago, HP enhanced the slide show to include both the photo capsule title and the caption in the slide show views. With planning, the slide show can summarize the content of a hub in words and pictures, acting something like an illustrated table of contents or even a "trailer," depending on how you construct it.

      I think this feature has possibility for encouraging the more visual or less-focused visitor. Such a visitor could opt to view the slide show (an invitingly organized and visual content map) to find out whether he wants to read the text. Even if he doesn't read the text, he's at least absorbed the essence of the hub and has spent some time on the page.

      The way the feature works now, there are a few obstacles in optimizing this quick-bite approach, among them that slide shows require a minimum of 5 photos, videos aren't included in the show, and the concept of using the slide show in this way isn't promoted (yet) by HP.

      What do you think?

      You said, "Maybe people like to graze rather than feast." I think so. smile

      1. lobobrandon profile image90
        lobobrandonposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        This is a brilliant idea. I've been checking the real time analytics at Google Analytics and have noticed that quite a few people view the slideshow. But, none of my pics have detailed descriptions or any noteworthy caption - maybe it's time to add some.

        1. Sally's Trove profile image78
          Sally's Troveposted 12 years agoin reply to this

          One thing I haven't done yet is design a hub based on this technique. I've only been slowly retrofitting my existing hubs, as in, as you say, adding titles and detailed captions. Glad you think it's a good idea. smile

          1. lobobrandon profile image90
            lobobrandonposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            Also, I've been adding more pics and videos to my hubs. I've done it on a few of the best performers and my traffic in April is much much higher than previous months. It's been a steady climb since April 1st when I began adding stuff. My traffic from about 70 views a day is now averaging 150 - pretty good increase even though the amount is still low.

            I've been busy got my exams and projects, assignments and stuff so will be continuing the modifications from the 20th. Will let people know how it works out on 1st May. Hopefully by then I'll complete all.

          2. 2uesday profile image65
            2uesdayposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            I have just had a look at this feature and it has lots of potential to adapt and update older hubs. I think it will be useful in several ways when making new pages, thank you for pointing it out.

            Good luck with those exams lobobrandon and with the hub traffic too.

            1. lobobrandon profile image90
              lobobrandonposted 12 years agoin reply to this

              Thanks wink

  7. Greekgeek profile image78
    Greekgeekposted 12 years ago

    The sheer smount of stuff flying at us from the internet means people are continually reaching for shortcuts. They're only going to read something long if it really engages their attention and speaks to them; otherwise, they'd rather get what they need and get out. This means that it's no longer enough to be a moderately decent writer on the web-- we are long past the early days when there was't much good content on most topics. Supply of content has now outpaced demand by an order of magnitude.

    That puts us back to the model we had pre-web, except that instead of the expense of publishing making it impractical to publish everything, instead, it costs little to publish, but the audience may not come to our stuff because someone else's stuff is better or appears better. The demand is out there, but we can't ALL satisfy it. If we want to succeed, it's no longer enough to write on what you want; you also have to study what the audience wants and give it to them, whether that's videos, images, or other media, or the answer to a problem.

    All that aside, I think this comment is hugely insightful:

    I think you're right, considering video game emphasis on getting stuff (sometimes called "loot")

  8. Dale Nelson profile image37
    Dale Nelsonposted 12 years ago

    I think that there are more surfers on the net via PDAs,Tablets and phones than there were in the last two years. Numbers grow every time the big 3 launch a new piece of tech for mobile users.

    So the question we may ask is, is our content easily read on a handheld device.

    But yes, we will still get the pc user who tends to read a little more than most.

    Are the numbers recorded by HP and Analytics a true reflection of the type of traffic we receive.

    This may explain the image searcher numbers growing.

    Just my two cents.

    Great points form all though.Enlightened post.

  9. 2uesday profile image65
    2uesdayposted 12 years ago

    This is encouraging as the comments here are confirming the lines I have been thinking along.

    The PDAs,Tablets, phones and apps (some things that I have not even begun to understand) are part of a percentage of on-line users everyday lives.

    You see people in the supermarket using their phones to check ingredients for recipes.

    In relation to this I can recall viewing a web page that showed you how much of a site showed up on different types/sizes of screens. In blogger you can view what your page looks like in a mobile version - which got me thinking about this. It is no good having material if the audience cannot view it, so we may have to change the way we display work as things evolve.

    The virtually owning something could fit with lots of trends -
    the need to cut expenditure on luxuries.

    Also the taking longer to get to the point of purchasing something, you collect virtual images of it and it is like a 'I want one of these shopping list' that you will refine in time until you make your final decision on which one you will purchase. This has a special term the moment when the decision to buy is made, cannot recall it begins with a Z - maybe it zero moment of truth.

    It is all a little bit strange, can you remember in Star Trek where they could enter a room that could create the virtual world of their choice to live in for a while?

    Added - it is ZMOT - I found a link about it.

  10. 2uesday profile image65
    2uesdayposted 12 years ago

    I never knew you could use the slide show in that way, thank you Sally's Trove.
    I will edit some of my travel pages to use it.

  11. Michael Willis profile image66
    Michael Willisposted 12 years ago

    It depends on the subject matter, whether people are looking more for images or written text. Each category is different.
    In some categories, a picture says volumes, but in others the text gives the information readers are looking for. There needs to be a balance to a site to keep ALL readers interested.
    This is why I see an all-site-wide format as the Pinterest layout as a bad idea. Some categories will benefit from this. There are others I only see losing from it. The categories that provides text information to the readers who do read, will get distracted from extra images and smaller text area.

    A balance in the site would be better with the layout not forced site-wide.

  12. Don Simkovich profile image60
    Don Simkovichposted 12 years ago

    Changes will also come in the form of mobile. Online searchers want information to suit their needs quickly. Will mobile internet searches mean less need for full text? There will certainly be a need for text.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)