Why Do Judges and Lawyers Wear Wigs and Robes?

  1. ngureco profile image84
    ngurecoposted 8 years ago

    Why Do Judges and Lawyers Wear Wigs and Robes?

  2. Kailey86 profile image55
    Kailey86posted 8 years ago

    I used to know the answer as I attended out articling students call to the bar this year. Sadly I have forgotten the entire reason, but there is a symbolic reason and it is an age old tradition.

    There was an interesting story behind it, if you would like to know I would suggest contacting the law society in your area. The law society is the society that governs lawyers and their practice in that state, province or territory. They would probably be able to give you a better description, and more detail into the story behind it.

    Hope this helps!

  3. JanTutor profile image81
    JanTutorposted 8 years ago

    Until the seventeenth century, lawyers were expected to appear in court with clean, short hair and beards.

    Wigs made their first appearance in a courtroom purely and simply because that’s what was being worn outside it; the reign of Charles II (1660-1685) made wigs essential wear for polite society.

    The judiciary, however, took some time to convince; portraits of judges from the early 1680s still show judges defiantly sporting their own natural hair, and wigs do not seem to have been adopted wholesale until 1685.

    The reign of George III (1760-1820) saw wigs gradually go out of fashion. By the end of the century they were mainly worn by bishops, coachmen and the legal profession - and even bishops were given permission to stop wearing wigs in the 1830s.

    Judges wore only full-bottomed wigs until the 1780s, when the less formal, and smaller, bob-wig, with frizzed sides rather than curls, and a short tail or queue at the back, was adopted for civil trials.

    The full-bottomed wig continued to be used for criminal trials until the 1840s, but is today reserved for ceremonial dress; smaller wigs are used on a day-to-day basis.