|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisements has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Pigs could grow human organs in stem cell breakthrough ?
Human organs could be grown inside pigs for use in transplant operations following
Notice while these mammals have similar enough make-up (warm-blooded, live-birthing, overlaps in design coding, etc.) to facilitate initiation and reproduction of the organic materials and human stem cell data for growth in the surrogate medium (pig), it still remains a matter of expertise in medical intervention to maintain by various artificial provisions and engineering the new part's functionality, if any, even when within the given simililarities of species within the same class (mammalian). Your argument might bode better for your conclusion if it were the pig who were going to use the new organ. A similar example to this would be a successful heart transplant, from a pig or orangutan, to a human. But the degree of difficulty and level of intelligent manipulation required to enable or maintain the part's functionality and purposes of rejection, endurance, etc. decreases significantly once the part is transplanted into the medium for which it was designed (as in your example, human), and even then is still never eliminated completely and maintenance of functionality remains a task that requires personal attention. (As we know, there is never any unit that functions as well, if at all, as when all of its parts conform perfectly to its design specs, right?) And finally, your scenario, in any event, remains deficient to bridge the design differences between organisms that are not of the same class or even between those of the same class that do not parallel as closely. The deficiency is simply easier to spot in the extreme examples of the drastic class differences, whereby we can see that the finding you mention actually has no impact on the interchangeability barrier pertaining to macro-evolution.
Good stuff though and I enjoy the correspondence---Fun! I have the follow this question button checked if this doesn't nail it down for anyone. And please let me know anything further?
Which company or agency will do the most to cure neuromuscular diseases, war injuries, and diabetes in the 2010s? read more
It's interesting you should ask this question. I recently wrote an article on developing spider silk through goat milk through gene manipulation. I've been very interested in the research.
Then, recently I watched a program on the Science Channel where a doctor is doing just this... only, not with pigs, but with sheep. He has a farm and has been basically injecting sheep embryos with human stem cells and he has found that he can manipulate up to around 25-27%. The idea, of course, is the same, growing organs for humans in need.
There are some benefits and drawbacks and still a lot of unanswered questions. Is 30% human match going to be better than 100% human match? Who knows?
I think there will still be a lot of the same problems that they go through now.
The real question is, can they make it work enough? If 30% is enough of a match and they go through the same amount of risk factors and rejection rates, that's still a success, considering there will be no more waiting lists and people dying by the wayside. There will probably still be fatalities, and if they received a pig donor organ, I'm sure that will get blamed, even if it wasn't the full cause.
It's an interesting question. Kidneys can function on around 10% before they fail completely. So maybe 30% of a human organ is enough to make it work. We'll have to wait and see.
by Make Money8 years ago
Feds Bust N.J. Officials - Mayors, Lawmakers, Rabbis Arrested"The politicians arrested were not accused of any involvement in the money laundering or the trafficking in human organs and counterfeit handbags."
by edmondpogi7 years ago
Should we legalise the sale of human organs?
by GamingCowboy4 years ago
At what point does someone stop being human?Just wrote a hub on Deus Ex, and it really got me thinking. At what point does someone stop being human? Technology is progressing rather quickly, and things like robotic...
by christchild8 years ago
Do most of the food and the environment is causing the human organs to malfunction, leading to...most of these terminal illnesses? why do normal nature take it's course, instead of using all these vertilizers and...
by accofranco8 years ago
What was the most important engineering breakthrough of the past 120 year? And why did you chosed your answer,please answer wisely.Lets learn.
by Jenna Ditsch6 years ago
I saw the movie "Limitless" last night. I've thought about this before, but I was wondering what your thoughts are on the ability to unlock and use a greater capacity of the human brain. The...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.