Should the world’s total wealth be constant – when country A gets richer country

  1. ngureco profile image84
    ngurecoposted 4 years ago

    Should the world’s total wealth be constant – when country A gets richer country B gets poorer?

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/8022735_f260.jpg

  2. AlexK2009 profile image92
    AlexK2009posted 4 years ago

    It depends on what you mean by wealth, but what you describe is a zero sum assumption which is not necessarily true.  Wealth can produce more wealth without consuming wealth.   As an example creating an irrigation facility  will increase the well being and wealth of a community and no other community need  become poorer.

  3. chef-de-jour profile image95
    chef-de-jourposted 4 years ago

    You've opened a can of worms!! If money was like pure energy then yes, country A getting wealthier must affect B which loses out proportionally because the total money in that system remains the same. BUT I don't think this conservation law holds water when money is involved!

    I presume you mean that country A is currently China and that B= rest of the world!!

    As a kid I used to puzzle about the UK's Royal Mint in London, which printed and made all the money for the UK. If money is just money then why not just print more when the going gets tough!! I didn't realise that the amount of money you can physically create is related to the amount of gold in the reserve? Is this correct. Is it the same for all countries?

    I'm still puzzled by this idea!! If you know the answer I'd appreciate it.

    In the recent banking crisis and recession not one expert economist predicted such a fall - all they talked about was bubbles bursting and markets being nervous- they don't have accurate forecasts!

 
working