Youngest. By then the parents are tired. Loss of attention, education, gets what they want without working for it. They usually don't have the highest paying jobs.
Good answer! Youngest children are great manipulators. However, THEY have it THE EASIEST out of all birth orders.They have the LONGEST childhoods & LEAST responsibilities.They are in HEAVEN compared to being the OLDEST child in the family.
Yes, this is probably the case in many families, but not all.
HAPPENS in MOST, Caleb! Family drama galore!
As an only child, I can't really imagine sharing my life with siblings. But if I had to be in a multi-child family, I would NEVER want to be the middle child of 3. They are neither this nor that...a tough spot.
I WOULD NOT want to be the oldest child in a medium large to very large family (5 and more children per household). Oldest children in the family are seen and expected to be the more responsible and mature one. They are THE LEAST CHILDLIKE of all siblings. They must be as near perfect as possible. They must also be on their VERY BEST behavior. They are held to higher and more stringent standards than their younger siblings. They are the example setters and standard bearers for younger siblings.
Oldest children in small and medium sized families (2-4 children per household) are in a more glamorous position regarding their ordinal birth order. They are seen and treated as the hip and/or cool older siblings whom the younger siblings want to emulate. Although they are placed in responsible and authoritative positions, they do have a normative childhood and adolescence.
Oldest children are expected to be protoadults early in life. However, oldest children in medium large to very large families, the word protoadult has a very negative connotation. The position of oldest children in such families are akin to forced laborers and enslaved persons. They must be ON 24/7/365 for their parents and younger siblings. They have NO individual lives of their owns, as their needs are subverted for the good of parents and younger siblings.
Oldest children in such families are inculcated to place THEIR needs last. They are THE TRUE PARENTS/CARETAKERS of the family, not the parents. In fact, they are PARENTIFIED children whose normative and formative years are akin to the winter solstice. Oldest children in medium large to very large families have it THE HARDEST. They do not indulge in the things that oldest children from small and medium size families indulge in. Also, oldest children in medium large to very large families are THE LEAST likely to obtain an education as they are needed to work to supplement family income.
Oldest children in medium large to very large families are often CAST ASIDE by their parents when they are not servicable commodities to their families. Middle children in medium large to very large families are OFTENTIMES IGNORED. Well, oldest children in such families are IGNORED by their parents when they do not serve their parents' utilitarian purposes. Oldest children in medium large to very large families are THE SECOND MOST NEGLECTED children as more parental time is SPENT on younger children.
by Grace Marguerite Williams 8 months ago
I believe that the oldest child in a family have the toughest and roughest path to go. He/she was automatically dethroned upon the birth/births of a successive sibling/siblings. He/she is often held to a higher and stricter standard than his/her younger siblings, ...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
Frank J. Sulloway in his breakout bestseller, BORN TO REBEL, indicated that one adopts attitudes and respond to the environment, familial or outside, based upon one's respective birth order. Dr. Sulloway indicated that oldest children tend to be more conservative and are not...
by Jami Johnson 3 years ago
Who's smarter the first born or the second born (or the third or forth)?I always hear, the first born child is smarter because they have more attention from the parents.... or the second born is smarter because of the older brother/sister, etc... So what do you believe? Are the first born children...
by Cindy Lawson 5 years ago
How many children do you think is too many to have?There is a woman on the island where I live who survives only on benefits and now has 14 children. She openly admitted she got jealous when her 16 year old daughter got pregnant last year. The Husband left her a couple of years back, and most of...
by Nichol marie 3 months ago
Do you know someone who is prejudice of larger families?Why do some people have an ignorant belief that moms of large families cannot be the same as moms with one or 2?
by Christian L Perry 3 months ago
What is the root cause of poverty in the world?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|