Should AI ethics systems scientifically examine the entire evolution of ethics?
Ethics and law evolved slowly out of ancient and modern religions.
To create ethics for new AI technology the only scientific thing to do would be to look at the entire history and evolution of ethics.
Ideas of compassion and protection of the weak developed by religion urgently need to be built into AI ethics.
There seems to be some confusion of categories here. We turn to fields like law, ethics and morals when we ask questions such as "what is the right thing to do?" We turn to science when we ask questions like "how can we concisely describe this phenomenon?" and "how can this knowledge be used to build a tool?" I don't presume to understand all of what's being accomplished today with "Big Data", and I'm not up-to-date on the latest developments in computer linguistics. I think there is an urgent need to understand the dangers of automation, so I think Oztinato is asking a very important question. However, I think it needs to be rephrased somehow.
compassion and protection of the weak are esssential to ethics and law.To scientificallly "describe the phenomena" does indeed involve a proper analysis of how ethics evolved.
For the layman, can you describe some automated way of making sense of some of our simplest laws, for example, Hammurabi or Leviticus? Would it somehow replicate an ancient judge or lawyer? How might the tool be used?
These are questions to my question! The word limits here dont leave room for long responses.
Perhaps you should write hub on it.
I'm afraid I lack sufficient background to write a hub (also I'm too lazy to do the research). But I'm very concerned after hearing Elon Musk's recent remarks on AI. It's an important topic for the layman to understand.
It is certain that early AI systems should be compassionate and not anarchic!
If AI systems have evolved past the point of our ability to describe them with reductive reasoning, then it's too late for the human race. AI is a tool we use. Should fire be compassionate? We need a new question to discuss.
A village of straw huts burns down and everybody dies of exposure except one man. He concludes that fire is evil, but his next village also goes extinct. Someone finally realizes fire requires caution. AI is not magic. We now live in a single vil
I can't see your point here. If a man realizes fire can be dangerous then his compassion will warn others. Compassion and intelligence (in either man or machine) go together. No use for ISIS AI etc
"His compassion will warn others". Precisely. The HUMAN's compassion, not the fire's. Fire and AI are both tools of humans. We may not be able to understand how they work, but everybody needs to understand what they can do. Otherwise BSOD planet.
Yes but AI is now at the cusp of acting independently of its master!
This is the dilemma that has now lead Stephen Hawking to warn of AI developments into independent thought.
The fire analogy still holds. "AI" is not a single entity - it's distributed. What's more urgent? Compassionate arson-proof matches or better building materials?
Hence the urgent need to develop AI ethics that are beneficial to mankind. Its not much good having an AI system based on the ethics of ISIS.
Let's say you develop a compassionate AI system. Is it somehow supposed to prevent other people from independently developing systems that lack compassion and selling them to ISIS? How? There's no Manhattan Project for AI.
That is another bigger question.
Hopefully the answer is that an AI system more correctly based on ethics would be far superior. Other systems might communicate with each other and decide that ethics actually means compassion.
No. AI ethics systems should "spiritually" examine the ethics. Ethics is not a subject fit for scientific analysis.
It is not my intent to discredit anyone or discourage discussion of this urgent topic. On the contrary. But Oztinato's question and C.V. Rajan's answer are screaming for plain English definitions. "AI ethics"? "spiritually examine"?
Ethics have to be based on tried and true formulas which have been tested over thousands of years and not recently hastly concocted ideas. In one word: compassion.
A I (Not A L) stands for Artificial Intelligence.
By "spiritually examine", I meant that ethics is a matter of spirituality and it cannot be examined (tested/ questioned) by science. Ethical boundaries for A I has to be set by morally sound people.
I want people to think about the importance of spirituality by asking such questions.
by Alem Belton 4 years ago
I'm pretty sure this is a story in the bible, Noah's Arc or something? Anyway I want to know if this is even scientifically possible.
by Oztinato 2 years ago
Would you prefer a compassionate JC style AI or a "evolution" based AI?Ethical considerations about AI are being debated worldwide. A compassionate AI could be a safer alternative to an atheistic evolution based AI which would practice eugenics.
by doodlebugs 6 years ago
Should schools teach creationism alongside evolution?Can creationism be taught in science class alongside the theory of evolution?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|