Why are youngest children in large/very families THE MOST AFFLUENT, SUCCESSFUL, &
OFTENTIMES the MOST EDUCATED out of all their siblings?
I don't come from a huge family, but the fact that I am professionally more successful than my elder brother in a given frame of time is- I learnt from his and all my elders' mistakes. You know how not to take up a career that's 'safe', amount of risk that's fair, where to invest, how to read people, etc. Younger ones in general have good sense of what not to do, that helps focus more on what to do, speeding the success rate in every aspect of life.
In large/very large families, it is usually the youngest children who are the most affluent, educated, & successful. Youngest children in large/very large families are given myriad opportunities that their oldest & other older siblings didn't & never had. Youngest children are furthermore treated far more preferentially than their older siblings.
Youngest children in large/very large families oftentimes have it easier than their oldest & older siblings. Since oldest & older siblings have to curtail their education to supplement family income, there is money coming in & that money is funneled to the welfare of the younger children in the household. Also, there are parents who are more economically solvent by the time the youngest child comes along so many a youngest child in large/very large families grow up in better socioeconomic circumstances than their oldest & older siblings so college & other forms of advanced education are a possibility. However, more likely or not, it is oldest & older children who send youngest children to college.
Since youngest children are the most educated out of all of their siblings, it is not rocket science that they will have the better jobs, earn more money, & be inordinately successful. That is par for the course. Even if they are not college educated, youngest children in large/very large families have avenues to achieve success that their oldest & older siblings DON'T & truthfully WON'T ever achieve in their lifetimes.
by Marianne Sherret 3 months ago
Is the youngest child in the family always spoilt?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 3 years ago
Why is it irresponsible, immoral, unintelligent, even illogical to have large/very largefamilies( 6 children or more per family), especially in this postmodern day and age when advanced contraceptive technologies are very accessible and available?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 4 years ago
(6 or more children per household) in the postmodern, 21st century United States, being fully cognizant of the fact that they will be subjecting their children to an extremely rudimentary and primitive socioeconomic living standard, even socioeconomic penury and poverty? Countless studies...
by Nichol marie 3 months ago
Do you know someone who is prejudice of larger families?Why do some people have an ignorant belief that moms of large families cannot be the same as moms with one or 2?
by H C Palting 7 weeks ago
Do you believe that poorer and/or less educated people have more children whom they can't support?Do you know any ill effects to the child(ren) born to these families and society? If so, what are they?
by Christian L Perry 3 months ago
What is the root cause of poverty in the world?
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|