Why has Stephen Hawking just predicted science will destroy the planet?
Hawking has just clearly blamed science for the inevitable future destruction of the world. He hasn't blamed religion. Is this because science has provided the weapons and the pollution? Why would such an eminent scientist blame science in this catastrophic way?
Because he is strange and knows things we dont. Bum Bum Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
He isn't blaming science, he didn't say "Stop teaching science because the Order of Science is amassing its minions and spreading its agenda."
He used science to show that humans are going to destroy the planet.
He used nuclear war and global warming as proof of this. Yes these are technically both results of advancing technology due to scientific progress, but they are more due to the attitude of human beings towards this planet.
Hawking also explicitly blamed the "careless hubris of the ruling elites and their tendency to act in favor of profit". Here he is talking about the corporate fat-cats that will slap 'eco-friendly' on a package despite that fact that it's been flown in from China, where it was made by 8 year old orphans.
If you think of Science as a tool, he didn't blame the tool: he blamed the people using them. For example, you wouldn't blame a hammer for knocking a hole in your wall, you would blame the person who swung it. A lot of scientists (like Stephen Hawking) are theoretical scientists. That means that they discover new things, they do not get to decide how their discoveries are used.
I think that Stephen feels as though once upon a time science used to be purely about knowledge and advancing quality of life, but now huge corporations will pay a team of researchers more money than the opposition to not publish data. Instead of being for the benefit of the whole of mankind, scientific advancements are being used primarily by the highest bidder.
You can't blame science for this. You can't blame scientists for this. You have to blame the people who sit on top of the ladder and do everything in their power tot make sure that the system never changes.
That's referred to as Scientism, this dogmatic belief that science can produce nothing morally wrong; and it's a disease to humanity.
I agree. There is an arrogant presumption that science is infallible.
Stephen Hawking needs Jesus Christ more than ever. I pray he come to know the Lord.
by Merlin Fraser7 years ago
I suppose it was an inevitable reaction to Stephen Hawking’s new Book ‘The Grand Design’ where he concluded that There is no place for God in theories on the creation of the Universe.To me, it is equally...
by Silver Rose8 years ago
I don't normally get involved in political debates, but had to wade into this one. Some foolish American magazine has made the following comment:"The controlling of medical costs in countries such as Britain...
by John Harper7 years ago
"The Big Bang was the result of the inevitable laws of physics and did not need God to spark the creation of the Universe."What say you?
by cruelkindness2 years ago
Who is considered the most intelligent living person in the world ?
by pisean2823117 years ago
God didn't create the universe -- it was actually a result of the inevitable laws of physics, British physicist Prof Stephen Hawking has concluded.In his latest book, The Grand Design, Hawking said: "Because there...
by Mrs Campbell6 years ago
Stephen Hawking has proclaimed God did not create the universe, so, does that mean there is no God?no God?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.