Which IS a better economic system: capitalism or socialism? Why? Why not?
It"s like when you go to school and your teacher introduces capitalism for the first time that you finally start to click with what it is. Capitalism becomes like our independent state. Checks and balances come into play which is formulated by wants and needs. So everybody is included in this picture. All the elements from different themes and ideas can participate in this affair. And the sky is the limit! Then after taxes and we get full, socialism rises in the horizon and gives us a whiff of its perfume. Are we interested, hell yes! Would you call that an adulterous affair?
An answer would be meaningless without knowing the details of the government and the tax system that would prevail.
Economic systems are tools. Better depends upon what one wants to accomplish. It is like asking if a hammer is better then a wrench.
If you want to, for instance, use up all of our natural resources the fastest, then I'd say capitalism is superior. If you care more about equality and the common good then perhaps socialism. If you want one that considers sustainability, then neither. You'd have to look towards something like steady-state economics.
True capitalism is best. Capitalism, not crony capitalism where the corporations and banks run everything and we pretend it's a fair market. The kind of capitalism this country was built on that rewards ingenuity and integrity in business.
That said, capitalism is an economic system, it's not meant to apply to all areas of government. Public schools, fire and police departments, roads, wildlife preserves and even the military are all examples of socialist systems within government. Socialist economies are the problem.
Can you distinguish between socialism and nationalism? SS, Medicare, Obamacare, and welfare are socialism. The military, the roads, fire and police are not socialism. Schools could have gone either way, but today the public schools look like socialis
Nationalism is the elevation of your own country above others... You can debate whether the military is truly a socialist system, but you can't say the infrastructure itself is nationalism.
Capitalism works well in the US, but for the Philippines, I think socialism would be a better option. This is because there's so much corruption in government, but under a socialist system you'd still have to give a fixed share of what you have or what you steal. Also, big businesses are obliged to give health benefits to employees in the Philippines but a lot of companies get past that by only hiring contractuals, and consistently rehiring contractuals so they don't get long term benefits. Socialism would circumvent things like this.
by Earl S. Wynn 6 years ago
What is the ideal economic system? Communism, socialism, capitalism, etc?Conversely, have these systems been proven to be failures? Is there a better system?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
What are the ways that capitalism is THE BEST & MOST EQUITABLE economic system while socialism isTHE VERY WORST economic system?
by Charles James 7 years ago
As some fellow hubbers will know, I am involved in writing hubs for a Socialism 101 series.There are a few issues raised by the conservatives where I do not fully understand what they are saying. Before I address these in a hub or hubs I really would like clarity on what exactly the conservative...
by Peter V 5 years ago
What do you think about Socialism? Good or Bad for America?I have my own opinion but what do you think of the current direction America is heading (towards socialism)? Do you think this is very bad and goes against what America was founded on or is this generally a good thing? Please support your...
by Sophia Angelique 7 years ago
sm.Socialism are services provided by the state, e.g. medicare, social security, unemployment benefits, disability benefits, etc. Socialism can also include things like subsidized transport, subsidized electricity, etc.Socialism is part of democracy and Canada, the US, the UK, all countries in...
by Peter Freeman 6 years ago
Recently there have been some long-tailed debates held in the comments section of certain Hubs. Particularly in the Hubs written by James Watkins and John Holden. I was wondering if it would be possible to have a reasonable debate here. Not that I'm hopeful but it's worth a try:Socialists hold that...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|