If transhumanism really takes off, what do you think will then give us meaning in life?
To my understanding this "movement" is at the most about a decade old. To me that is really funny. I was born in the '50's and I can not at all remember when this notion was not well accepted by people.
It seems the group now espousing it is trying to codify it as though it has a logic that excludes certain free thought. However long ago it happened the folks we refer to as Quakers had the opposite idea. You cannot have an obvious counter culture unless something is generally considered part of culture.
I am quite sure that aqueducts, sextons and metallurgy were advances in technology to help give more free time to better society. You get into folks like Mendel and Pasteur and Edison and you realize that considering this new wave of thought "new and improved" is just silly. The Wright brothers and Ford would chuckle.
I wonder why they had me take "shop", science and chemistry in school.
The question of whether or not this "takes off" was probably answered about 4,000 years ago. (or did we re-invent the wheel?)
Sorry, I don't know anything about this question. Meaning in life is up to the individual.
Science is a way of understanding the mechanics of the universe but it cannot give us meaning - that is the province of theology and philosophy.
For example, climate science can help us estimate future climate but it can't tell us if it is better or worse to use trillions to lift people out of poverty and adapt to the changing world or try to hold the climate stable.
by My Esoteric 6 weeks ago
Since the 1980s (I remember them well) environmental scientists have been predicting global devastation if the world does nothing to prevent the rise in global temperature. Why then? Because enough time had elapsed since the beginning of the industrial revolution for the damage it began...
by Ralph Deeds 5 years ago
" ROCHESTER — IN 1982, polls showed that 44 percent of Americans believed God had created human beings in their present form. Thirty years later, the fraction of the population who are creationists is 46 percent. "In 1989, when “climate change” had just entered the...
by emrldphx 6 years ago
I wonder when the majority of the public is going to acknowledge that scientists, deriving their grant money from governments, are often biased, or outright liars?http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor … ng-debate/
by Tumbletree 7 years ago
As an American, perhaps as a person on the planet today, it's very difficult to stay informed. If one makes the mistake of turning on the TV to watch the News, one realizes they're wasting their time soon enough. American "news" really is designed to entertain, not to inform and empower,...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|