A recent study is showing the decline in average age is still declining. The study blames: drug overdoses, suicides, alcohol-related illnesses and obesity.
It is also note-worthy that:
The five states with the highest death rates overall were:
* Medicaid not expanded
The five states with the lowest death rates were:
I think the short list you provided would be at the very top of one that is longer. Poor diet, for instance, almost certainly contributes, as does the stress level of modern life.
I'd also add that insinuating the cause is lack of expanded medicaid is foolish; medicaid does not prevent suicides, alcohol related illnesses or obesity. Not even drug OD's or poor diet.
Medicaid is a factor in over all health. More importantly, why are Red states at the bottom of the longevity list and Blue states at the top. What is it about their respective lifestyles or access to healthcare that makes the difference.
I'll add your poor diet to the rest and ask the question - "What is it about the environment in those respective states that drive different rates of poor diet, obesity, drug overdoses, suicides (which has a strong gun related component), and alcohol use?"
Poor family structure? Excessive meat consumption? Violence, in home and out? Poverty? Excessive alcohol consumption? Poor sanitation? Lack of exercise resulting in obesity? Poor quality water?
You asked - there are 9 possibilities, and not a one can be "cured" by expansion of medicaid. I repeat: there is no reason to insinuate that expanding medicaid will help any of the causes of falling life spans. Given that you specified falling average age rather than falling life span, one can even include high birth rates lowering child deaths, or an increase in illegal aliens (which are typically on the young side). Even legal immigration, as I doubt that they average age is as high as the country wide average.
I need to go an tangent here. You used the term "cure" - why? Why not use the term "help" instead?
I equate declining average age with falling life spans, although the latter is probably more correct.
Cure, help - I used the term as meaning both. Medicaid will not reduce the number of alcoholics out there, and can thus not help the problem and neither will it stop drug use.
I, too, read it as falling life spans but re-reading your post it doesn't really say that - it says the population is getting younger. This is in contradiction with the increasing numbers (comparatively speaking) of elderly, which has to mean that that trend is dying, and replaced with larger numbers of young people. As far as I've heard, life spans are actually increasing...once one has reached, say, 50 or 60 years old. Certainly the SS figures indicate that, so that, too, supports increasing numbers of young. Or, as you indicate, middle aged people are dying off too quickly, which fits with drug OD's, violence, etc. Not too many 80 year old people die of either one - it is the middle aged that do, for the most part.
(Did you see the news report on the 80 year old woman that beat an intruder into submission until the cops came? Beat him with a table, then table legs, then dumped shampoo (I think) over him and proceeded to beat him with a broom, repeatedly jabbing him with it as he lay on the floor and tried to take it away from her).
I was about to post an answer pointing out that the survey seemed to have left out the effects of stress and poor diet, but then I saw that you had covered it. I have to agree with you on this one.
This, to my mind, is a complex issue. However, from the data, I see it's a marginal change and I have another reason for it. In my sojourns in the States I have observed very few Americans indulging in meaningful spiritual exercises. Maybe be if a vast number took up yoga it will improve the mental well being and that will affect longevity. Just a thought and no offense meant.
Why yoga, they get their deep breathing from Hollywood action movies and porn.
Yes, it is a marginal change, but declining three years in a row. Could yoga help? I seriously think so. Could living in green areas help, studies are now proving that to be true as well. Could reducing the intake of potato chips (my down fall), ice cream, candy, whole milk, and the like help? Most likely.
Probably the thing that would help the most (besides stop drinking (which I did), stop smoking (which I did), stop the drug use would be increase exercise (which for some very stupid reason I refuse to do). I think if a lot of people did those things, the rate of suicide would fall. (Also, having all states enact gun laws like CA, NY, and CT have would reduce suicides as well).
Add to your list Heart disease
Cancer, Chronic lower respiratory diseases:
Accidents, Stroke, Alzheimer's disease: Stress Diabetes:Influenza and pneumonia:
Most related to our foods, water, air and lack of excerize.
I agree a shorter life expectancy, most are brainwash to disagree.
Medical care should actually prevent all of those things to some extent. Both preventatively and in 3/4 cases by treating the sequelae.
The medical profession is the leading cause of death in the world.
My studies come from my 2nd home town called Santa Famalia, Belize. Average life expectancy is age 92. At age 80 their bodies are like the bodies of a 50 year old here in North America. It because they drink natural spring river water and natural foods. That is why I am a urban farmer and build natural tiny houses and use pot for medicine..
In the decline of life expectancy there is also a major role of progressively weak immune systems which are leading towards vulnerability to more diseases and the increasing rate of spread of many congenital diseases.
Large number of people every die due to respiratory tract disorders which usually runs in families and are amoungst genetically transferred diseases. If one or both the parents have these it is very likely for the childto also have the disease thus diminishes the chances of long survival of the individual
What is it, do you suppose, is leading to an increase in weak immune systems relative to say 20 years ago?
That's something I wonder about - specifically the "why" of what seems to be a large increase in allergies, which could indicate immune system problems of some kind. Is it the proliferation of chemicals in our lives - we live in a chemical age as no other society ever has.
I also wonder about the increasing use of cleansers around the house and in public - I see more and more places offering cleansing wipes for shopping buggy handles. Without use the immune system deteriorates like everything else - are we destroying our own immune systems by denying it "work to do" and keeping a super clean environment? I believe so, though that belief is very tentative.
Its all just because we now need artificial immunity by the surrounding as our immune is not basically strong enough to form a solid barrier against the pathogens found in the environmrnt
While that may be true, the question becomes "why are our systems not able to cope?". Is it because we have weakened them by excessive use of bacterial killers in our every day lives? I tend to think it is, but have no solid evidence. At best, it seems to me that those people using those types of things are generally more sickly than those that do not.
Its just a fact that 20 years ago due to higher death rates because of less medical enhancements individuals were less likely to survive and only the ones with the best immune. Thus experience a longer ang helthier life.
Aside from this the longivity and quality of life is also effected alot due to self medications which creates side effects of drugs and antibiotic resistance which worsen the situation as the age progresses.
Too many antibiotics given out too often, weakens the ammune system. Most problems is foods more than 3 ingredients on the package, it's a rule I won't buy. For 55 years and traveled over a 100 countries I did not spent one over night in a hospital bed. Until I started taking antibiotics, I replace them with healthy foods and liquids, or course the doctors dislike the idea. Although they can't find anything wrong with me now.
"Too many antibiotics given out too often, weakens the ammune system."
And interesting statement. Can you provide actual studies showing this rather than a couple of anecdotal instances? And what would the "too many" be? 20 prescriptions per year or only 2 or 3?
Certainly it is acknowledged that "too many" antibiotics can and will produce "super bugs" but I've never heard about compromising an immune system.
I personally fought off a few doctors from giving me too many experimental antibiotics that I refused based on good sense, or I would be died today.
When I caught a very dangerous unknown virus. That cause a heart valve surgery soon after, which I accepted.
I think antibiotics in emergency situations will save your life. But as a regular treatment for so many things that come along, it is more harmful than good in the long run. Where there are many natural antibiotics that I use instead.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-08- … sease.html
One piece of personal anecdotal evidence, then. Nothing to support your claim that too many antibiotics weakens the immune system.
But, as I mentioned, it is well known that we are producing super bugs with the indiscriminate use of antibiotics. Which is why most doctors are becoming more hesitant to prescribe them. Of course "natural" antibiotics will produce the same effect...
A lot of things contain antibiotics that we don't think about, our meat for instance. Living in a rural state that was a major meat for consumption producer, there was a lot of flack over antibiotics given to chickens and pigs. The great chicken producer, Tyson Foods, (I believe) claims to have stopped putting antibiotics in water for its commercial chickens. Also, many soaps, body washes, and even dishwashing liquids like Dawn at one time bragged about having antibiotics in them. We were being subjected to a lot of antibiotics that we didn't realize were contained in products. Antibiotics didn't just come from the doctor's office. So, I don't think there is an answer to how many antibiotics are too much because some are nonprescription.
Good point, although I'm not sure at all that antibiotics given to farm stock would attack the same bugs making us sick. Certainly a few diseases transfer from animals to humans, but in general I don't believe it is that common.
Wilderness, I don't think that was the point that the naysayers of antibiotics in animals were making. I believe they were saying that an antibiotic is an antibiotic and doesn't distinguish between a bacteria that attacks pig or chicken and a bacteria that attacks a human, and that when we get too much of a good thing (antibiotics) in our bodies, it turns our immune systems down or even off and leaves us with little or no protection from bugs that respond to antibiotics. That is why Tyson Foods said they stopped using it in chicken water.
You could well be right - I'm no microbiologist. And it makes very good sense, too - antibiotics are not like vaccines, targeting just one organism.
Something I forgot to mention. Tyson and companies like them were (some still are) giving antibiotics to the animals to keep the deaths to the animals down because the diseases spread rapidly among the confined animals. The companies did not consider what effect this would have on the humans who purchased the antibiotic contaminated meat from the grocery store or butcher and consumed it. Sorry, I left that out of my last post.
Beyond being 73, with high blood pressure, high cholesterol, Type II diabetes, prostate cancer (all controlled or eliminated) I am in pretty good health. Very few colds, allergies, flu, no chronic pain and the like. I attribute it with eating a lot of dirt as a kid.
Your tainted dirt system may have helped your ammune system.
Mine tainted system came from world travels. I just can't eat brains or intestines or any unfishished business.
LOL Like you, I seldom get sick. My mother tells me that she would tie my sister and I to a tree when very young and she was working in the garden - Sis sat and cried but I was happy eating dirt.
Sounds like you didn't run to Dr. Pill when things were a little off
Y'all are funny, both of you (ME and Wilderness). By the age of 3, my father would have us kids all in the garden digging in the dirt with him. I'm sure we ingested our share.
Well playing in the dirt actually acts as vaccination for many diseases as in the dirt a kid experience many weak pathogens. Getting rid of those weak pathogens our body do produces memory cells against them which would be helpful in further life when theperson experiences the pathogen again in the future.
by Phanti 5 years ago
"Wealth protects the rich; poverty destroys the poor." Proverbs 10:15What does this verse say to you, do you agree or disagree? Is this relevant in today's society? If so, what can be done about it?
by Scott Belford 5 years ago
When the Robert's Court, while upholding the most important part of Obamacare, struck down the the penalty to any State not buying into the expanded Medicaid program, they condemned millions of somewhat poor Americans to no chance at healthcare at all unless they move. That is because States...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 3 months ago
Disclaimer: Not discussing rich people who inherited their wealth & made nothing of their lives. Not addressing poor people who are elderly, physically/emotionally/intellectually/ psychologically challenged &/or disabled, & people who fell on temporary socioeconomic hard...
by Scott Belford 5 years ago
... are trying to encourage those who fall in the Medicaid gap they created to move out of their State? Hospitals in those States are reporting increased unpaid (meaning you paid) emergency room visits from this group.
by Ralph Deeds 7 years ago
Barrels of ink have been spilled over Medicare during this year's campaign. There's nothing wrong with that: Obama and Romney have fundamentally different approaches to Medicare and they deserve attention. Romney, for example, wants to increase the eligibility age to 67 and convert Medicare into a...
by Jack Lee 2 years ago
Here are the 7 -"Arizona's John McCain, Alaska's Lisa Murkowski, Ohio's Rob Portman, Tennessee's Lamar Alexander, West Virginia's Shelley Moore Capito, Nevada's Dean Heller, and Maine's Susan Collins were the dissenting GOP Senators on the Obamacare Repeal Reconciliation Act (ORRA) Wednesday....
Copyright © 2020 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|