Hello and good Sunday to all!
The frigid weather is finally letting up and we will reach 50 degrees today! Woohoo.
Anyway as a former public school teacher I think that the public school format needs an overhaul.
The local and state education organizations have tried different programs over the years to improve the achievement scores of students,but it doesn't seem to be enough.
Many parents have given up on public education and enrolled their children on private school ,charter schools or home school them .
What do you think of single sex public schools? Should schools go totally one gender or should schools create single sex
My guess would be that student achievement, while probably having some positive affect by gender separation, has more to do with the class and educational level of the parents. 'Round here the best schools have the most Asians, meaning those households demand high grades of their kids, or so I would think.
I'm against single sex schools because I think for early teens in particular, they foster an unhealthy attitude to the opposite sex.
I went to a co-ed school, where in our early teens we girls generally regarded the boys with disdain - we knew only too well what pimply, uncouth little animals they were! At the same age, my sister and her friends - who went to a single-sex school - regarded boys as mysterious and attractive. The girls from the girls' only school would seek out boys and were certainly indulging in sexual activities long before the girls from the co-ed.
These are good points. Educators only want students to achieve more in school by not being attracted or distracted by the opposite sex,I suppose.
What they do outside is another story.
Well said. To hide a thing means arouse curiosity on it. Let it be limited to an extent. When we coexist in a family, why should there be a separate public school for one gender?
I went to a co-ed school till year 6, then went to a (rather prestigious) boys only high school for two years. After that, my family moved to a new city, interstate, where I again ended up at a co-ed high school. There were pro's and cons to both schools, in my mind.
Boys only, made us more curious about girls, but gave us somewhat limited experience relating to girls during my teens. It was (much) more challenging meeting (strange) girls.
Co-ed was better on that front, but rivalries etc came to the surface.
Eg. I want to ask "so & so" out, but she's dating "him", then the other girl was dating "whoever" etc.
Better, or worse, one vs the other? Don't know. Horses for courses. I guess it could be beneficial in some circumstances.
Yes, boys are are curious about girls and vice-versa.They do get to associate outside of school at social events hopefully.
HOPEFULLY. That's the key word.
If a boy has a good social network of family and friends, he's ok.
In my case, because I was a foreign immigrant, with obvious ethinc differences to the culture I was in,made it a little restricted.
BTW, I am still a normally developed human being. I don't think I suffered adversley from the experience.
Yes that's true Stacie - the problem with students from single-sex schools (in my experience) is that because their curiosity isn't satisfied, it builds up to a fever pitch. Then when they do get a chance to associate with the opposite sex at social events, they really - er - associate.
Education and learning seems to yield better results if:
(a) Between the ages 0 – 12 years, any education and learning should be done in classes of mixed boys and girls.
(b) Between ages 13 – 18 years, boys and girls should be separated in schools.
(c) Thereafter, any education and learning should be done in classes of mixed gals and guys.
I think it should be an option. I have taught in both coed and single-sex schools. I know for a fact they can be of immense benefit to the majority of girls that attend them. I don't normally link one of my hubs, but it pertains precisely to the topic.
http://hubpages.com/hub/The_benefits_of … ex_schools
I went to single-sex public schools aged 4 to 18 (3 schools altogether, 2 days schools in London, and one boarding school in the Home Counties) and I think they are, on the whole, a good thing, particularly for girls. My sisters went to the same two day schools, and my brother to Dulwich College and then Westminster.
I have this vague feeling, though, that Americans interpret "public school" differently from here in the UK - by public school, I mean my parents paid for it.
Yes, LondonGirl; you are correct in your interpretation of the "public school" term over here in the states.
A public school is supported by tax dollars and is open to everyone.There is no charge for attending .
Here, those are state schools. Some are still single-sex, and pretty much all schools, state and public / private schools, have uniforms.
by agaglia 6 years ago
Do you think we can really close the achievement gap in our public schools?Our public school teachers are trying everyday in all kinds of ways to close the achievement gap. But, I wonder if as they are bringing the lower achieving students up, aren't they bringing the higher achieving kids up too?
by Sheila 9 years ago
Should grade schools in the US be more challenging academically and creatively? Are you satisfied with what your kids are learning at school?
by kashannkilson 7 years ago
Are public schools still important? Are charter schools and privatization the future? Does it even affect the country's role in the world economy?
by dragonrider32 8 years ago
1. There is no way on earth that all the kids in public schools now could be placed in private schools/homes. There are no where near enough places for them. If you don't provide for all of them...what are you setting the American future up for? Disaster.2. Private schools have waiting lists. If a...
by Davinagirl3 8 years ago
I have decided to home school my daughter. We can't really afford private schools, and public schools have destroyed their curriculum with standardized tests. I am curious to see what you all think.
by Rose West 8 years ago
I've been writing an article about the government's involvement in education... It seems to me that our kids would be a lot better off if the government had never gotten involved. But what if the Department of Education was stopped? What would education look like if public schools were closed?...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|