jump to last post 1-7 of 7 discussions (11 posts)

Is Sarah Jessica Parker a timeless beauty?

  1. Holisticity profile image59
    Holisticityposted 5 years ago

    Is Sarah Jessica Parker a timeless beauty?

    My husband thinks she is very beautiful  Myself, I don't know.  I like the way she takes everything in stride and doesn't worry too much about what people are thinking of her, and of course her shoes and clothes!!  She is a talented actress.  What are your thoughts?

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/6923215_f260.jpg

  2. profile image0
    CJ Sledgehammerposted 5 years ago

    Is she a timeless beauty? Well, I know nothing of her true character or moral principles, so I do not know if she is beautiful in spirit.

    Knowing that beauty is only skin deep, ask me what I think of her physical appearance 20 years from now. :0)

    Referring to someone as a "timeless beauty" is a hard standard to live up to, especially with the Law of Increasing Entropy acting upon us. As they say, "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder".

    So, in the eyes of your husband and Matthew Broderick (her husband), Sarah is beautiful, but in your eyes, and in mine - her "timeless beauty" is still open for debate. :0)

    1. profile image0
      CJ Sledgehammerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Damn, Nighwork4 bested me again. No one rewards an eloquent man these days. :0)

    2. Holisticity profile image59
      Holisticityposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      You are rewarded by Sarah's beauty

  3. nightwork4 profile image61
    nightwork4posted 5 years ago

    you're kidding right. i have no idea what people find attractive about her, she kind of gives me the creeps. she isn't pretty, her body is nothing great and she is about as materialistic as one can get.

    1. profile image0
      CJ Sledgehammerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I cannot believe I am saying this, but I think you and I may have found that ONE thing we can agree on. :0)

  4. FatFreddysCat profile image98
    FatFreddysCatposted 5 years ago

    Good Lord, no. She's got a horse face for cryin' out loud.

  5. duffsmom profile image59
    duffsmomposted 5 years ago

    No, not in a classic sense.  I would not say she is physically beautiful--BUT is considered beautiful because of the way she carries herself, dresses and the way she treats others. It really proves that there is so much more to beauty then just physical characteristics.

  6. Holisticity profile image59
    Holisticityposted 5 years ago

    Yeah I don't see why my husband likes her; it is nice though for her to carry herself so proudly.  Thank you all for answering!

    1. profile image0
      CJ Sledgehammerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I saw my mother today and asked her what she thought of S.J. Parker (trying to get more feedback for you). She said that Sarah looks as good as she does because of all the make-up artists, fashion designers, and P.R. people. She thinks Sarah is fake.

  7. gmwilliams profile image86
    gmwilliamsposted 5 years ago

    I just had breakfast.   No she is not and never will be a timeless beauty.   Who are we kidding here!   She is in the same class as Gabourey Siboudey!   You know her-one of the ugliest persons on this earth!

 
working