Do you like the original versions of songs, or their covers better?
I hear a lot of mixed reviews about this topic. Personally, I tend to like the originals because I feel like they have more meaning.
Generally the originals by the original artists, if they are also recording artists, are better. There are exceptions, look at the original, 'Anna' by Arthur Alexander, abysmal, compared with the Beatles version, and the same can be said for his 'You'd Better Move On', when compared to the version by the Rolling Stones.
I'd agree in general that I usually like the original better. But there are lots of exceptions to that. Whitney Houston's version of "I Will Always Love You" was certainly a lot more popular the the original recorded by the composer Dolly Parton, although I still do love Dolly's version.
I despised the term cover.
Bob Dylan writes great songs and records them. With very few exceptions, I perfer the versions recorded by Joan Baez and Peter, Paul and Mary.
Some songs are best sung by the original artist, especially if he/she wrote the song or it was written with a particular music style in mind.
John Denver wrote "Leaving on a Jet Plane." For him it was another song, for Peter, Paul and Mary, it was their only hit single.
Sometimes you can enjoy both versions equally, which is great. However, some very good singers, do not write their own music. So they have to do "cover versions."
I agree with most of what you said, but why despise the word?
Cover has a negative sound to it. Back in the old days, when we listened to vinyl LPs,there were many popular singers we saw on TV and heard on radio, everyone sang songs recorded by others. Some were good, some were bad, but you had more choices.
I like both depending on how well they are done. Ring of Fire by Johny Cash is great. However, Jack Savoretti came out with a cover that sounds completely different and completely amazing.
There are many great points here. I agree w/ both Larry and Mick that some songs are better performed by others than by the songwriter. My observation is that remixes of hit songs are generally poor. In fact, I often think that there are SO many today that it is a form of laziness just as in new versions of classic and highly popular films. I've no problem w/ multiple versions of classic songs or traditionals, just don't "bastardize" them and use enough innovation to not be a lazy copycat unless you are a legit "cover band" like the Fab Four.
In my opinion, it depends. Most of the time I really just like the original version of a song, but sometimes I don't even realize that the version I like is a cover from another singer or band. I really like 'Wild Horses' by the Rolling Stones. They sang it beautifully. But, and maybe I'm biased because I'm a 90's kid, I also really love the cover by The Sundays.
I don't mind covers as long as they are rearranged. Example:" Had a little help from my friends." Beatles, Cocker. " Proud Mary" Creedence, Tina Turner. Exact copies give me no reason to think they are any better.
It al depends which one I hear first. If I hear the cover first, then that is usualy the one that I like. I actualy wrote a Hub about my top 5 Cover Songs, and most of the ones on my list are because I heard the cover first.
by Veroniquebee 4 years ago
Can cover version of a song be better than the original?
by Insane Mundane 4 years ago
Here of late, I've run across several people (online & offline) that were spouting that only the King James Version of the Holy Bible contains the absolute truth. Even though the beloved dogma and ancient writings claiming to be inspired by the almighty God himself, it still has to be...
by Tim Quam 5 years ago
What are your favorite cover songs?If you created a music playlist where all of the songs were cover versions, what are some of the songs and whose versions would you include?
by godbyj 7 years ago
What are the greatest acoustic versions of rock songs?
by garbage free 8 years ago
How many versions of the bible are there?
by LauraGT 5 years ago
What do you think about Rolling Stone's cover photo of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (the surviving brother of the boston bombings)?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|