According to recent news, Michael Bay decided he wants to take the transformers franchise in a different direction, so he decided to recast the part mikaela in the new sequel. of course, he did say it had NOTHING to do with Megan Fox's interview with a British Magazine, where she compared Bay to Adolf Hitler. I don't know about that to be quite honest.
what i would like to ask you all is a few simple questions. do you think bay is right for doing this? if so why? or do you think that he's over reacting? plus, i would like to know, who do you think needs each other more. Does transformers 3 need megan fox more than she needs that movie? or is megan fox missing out? please discuss.
The reality is Megan Fox is expendable and she offended the man in charge. Yes, she is a beautiful superstar but there are plenty of those in Hollywood.
Who do you think she'll be replaced with?
I posted pics of at least 3 possible replacements being considered, all with good chances to be selected.
as much as i hate to say this, but i do agree with you completely. seriously, outside of her looks, megan fox was never a great actress. in fact, in both movies unless she was crying, she always had an emotionless expression on her face, that made it impossible to relate to her.
that's why it kind of bothers me that an actress like Gabourey Sidibe, who put on a great performance in "Precious" is barely getting offers for more parts. while megan fox is getting tons of those. which is unfair because Gabourey is a helluva a better actress than her. i guess that speaks volumes about our society as we value a person's looks over their actual abilities. sad, but it's a inconvenient truth.
i guess everyone doesn't have an opinion on this. hmmmm...
What difference would matter? She is a hot looking lady, but it's just another role in a movie. Even, the reasons for her not doing the movie is also irrelevant. So, why would anyone want to discuss it?
i don't know. i just find it kind of interesting because the only two things that were even remotely good about the transformers live action films were the special effects and how hot she was in both films. therefore, i kind of find it interesting that michael bay would use the excuse of "im taking the film in a new direction", just to recast her after she slammed him in a british magazine. I just find it funny. Don't get me wrong, i don't ever gloat over people's miseries or problems.
However, i do think michael bay is not only one of the most overrated directors out there, but he's also a GIANT HYPOCRITE. the reason i say this is because I remember watching him in an interview before he took on the first movie where he said and I quote: "I only take on movies that have a good story."
Yeah, that's kind of funny to me considering the fact that the LAST transformers movie didn't even finish the script until they shot the last scene, according to his own writers for "transformers: revenge of the fallen." yet he allegedly only cares about story. my thoughts are if all you really care about is special effects and money, then please for the love of god don't lie to my face about it. trust me, i would have way more respect for bay if he just came out and said that "story isn't important, it's about entertaining the audience." if he said something like that, then i'd respect him. however, since he claims to care about story content, when NONE of his movies ever had a great story.... All I can say to that is...."yeah keep telling yourself that...you freaking hack!"
There are hacks in every aspect of every job available or created. There are always going to be people who like to take short cuts, without looking at the overall scheme of things.
I'm not a big fan of those movies but I would like to see her in my bedroom. Looks like my chances are better since she won't be busy.
Your chances have not improved any, even though she is not busy.
I'd never heard of her until I watched Transformers. I don't recall seeing her in anything after that until Transformers 2. Let's face it, Optimus Prime and the other transformers are the stars of the movie. She wasn't really all that great in the last one anyway. She's just nice to look at sitting in a new Camaro!!
The underlying theme that Bay was going for or at least one of them is Sam's journey from boyhood into manhood and how that journey is paralleled by the Autobots own journey. In the first movie you saw Sam get his first car, his first real love, his first kiss(I am assuming given his nerdy archetype)then in the second film you see a maturing of that character as he goes off to college, long distance relationship, saying I love you for the first time so the natural progression is break up and loss so I have no problem if they want to leave Megan Fox out of the next one if they are moving Sam's character in that direction.
However if they dropped her due to the comments and the rumor surrounding the last film and they bring in yet another token hottie to further appeal to the young boy crowd then that is just wrong. Progress the character but don't try to parade an endless stream of mid-riff baring, pouty lipped sex objects out there just to sell tickets. I don't buy that. Bay will do what he normally does make sure there is enough eye candy that we don't notice what we are missing.
And yet one more possibility to take Megan's place.
Better hurry Megan, I won't wait forever!
well leeberttea, i like your confidence to get any of these girls. i would agree with cagsil about your chances, but seeing how that one guy ended up with sandra bullock, who was way out of his league. sure, it ended with him cheating on her, but still she was too good for the guy. i mean seriously, who was he before sandra married him?
therefore, im sure if your in the right place at the right time, then you might end up with any of these girls. the key word here is MIGHT. anyway, good luck to you.
nobody really important. just another run of the mill hollywood actress...*cough* who's had minor success at best. *cough*
She is the latest Hollywood goddess everyone is GA-GA over due to her looks and body. HO-HUM, I really do not care!
Cagsil, I've just looked a bit deeper in this tread and it helped.
I just jope they have the dinobots in it, because the fallen made no scense in the 2nd movie. I think she'll be in it, things change all the time.
I think that those movies are about having a decent plot to carry the real lure which is cool special effects,Shia LaBeouf's sarcasm, and a hot chick. While I think Miss Fox is simply delightful to gaze upon, truth is, any Hollywood hottie will do. A flick of a writer's pen for why, and maybe spritz of something wet looking on the replacement's cleavage during her debut scene and nobody will think twice about the change.
i agree with you about everything you just said, except for the plot being decent. bay could care less about that, as i could name a TON of plot holes in last movie.
Yes, you are right. But I will point out that I didn't say they need a great, well execute storyline, just a "decent plot." Doesn't take much, just a plausible reason for why the robots are fighting and the hot chick is there sweating into her decolletage.
yeah, your right, and the sad thing here is this. great movies like "invictus", "precious", "children of men" and many others that DO have great stories won't make anywhere near the amount of money the transformers movies will make because America would rather watch movies that rape their eyeballs visually then be entertained with a great story. that's the real sad part.
hell, just look at the remake of clash of the titans. that film was royally a piece of s***, but people loved it because of the special effects. go figure.
Tell me about it. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE to have my eyeballs raped, but I totally hear you. Great writing gets crapped on over and over and over and over and over and over and over in Hollywood. And even when they do get a good story, most of the time they destroy it. Bottom line is, the majority of people shelling out coin for movies don't want to think, so good movies "flop" financially, which means less get made, which also flop, until pretty soon it's going to be all foreign films, at which point, even I am too lazy to work that hard. If I'm going to have to read my movie, I'll just get the book.
Wouldn't it been better if you asked Kimberly to clarify was she meant?
The only reason I say that is because...you do not know if she is talking about the topic of the forum, or if she was talking about the lack of ability of writers of movies?
I personally think she was talking about the inability of writers to write a decent plot for movies and not so much concerned about the actress itself.
Then again, that's just an assumption, which sometimes works out, depending on how much is known about the person who makes the broad based statements that Kimberly did.
Just a thought.
Maybe one of the girls from HP should take her place... Any suggestions or volunteers??
lol. wow, that would be pretty cool. i can already think of a lot of lovely ladies to replace her already that are from here. lol.
I'm glad she isn't in it or I never would have scored my new acting role. Hugh Jackman is coming too lol.
I'll agree on that note too Steve. There are plenty of beautiful women in hollywood who could do the job, just as good, if not better.
I thought it was a stretch for the story to feature Megan fox and shitty labofant in the second film, I hope they really mess the 3rd film up with some more new transformers and leave out the original cartoons classic and iconic transformers.
I'm glad she's out. Maybe they can get somebody that can actually act in. Or maybe they could actually do a movie where the main hero doesn't require some sort of eye candy to accompany him everywhere...
get blondepoet in it, as she's way hotter than her anyways, and she can act unlike megan fox.
Oh gee whiz Steve I just appointed you my manager woo hoo!!!!!!!!!!!
wow, really? gee thanks bp. i appreciate the vote of confidence. i promise i won't let you down then. now, all that's left to do is to try to get you an audition with those people to discuss your terms. im sure once you get the part, you'll be an even bigger star than she ever was.
I second that motion! I think I would actually enjoy the 3rd installment if BP was in it!!
Megan Fox doesn't make the movie. Her character is minor. But it's a good chance to get another eye candy a shot at glory. Who? That should be something fun for fans of the movie in the next few months.
by Steven Escareno 8 years ago
In recent news, it turns out that Shia LaBouf has defended his former costar not starring in the 3rd installment of "Transformers" by saying she was never comfortable being a sex symbol that Bay wanted her to be. No, according to Shia, Megan was highly uncomfortable having her first...
by peter565 3 years ago
This vampire action movie staring Zac Efron and Megan Fox, do u think it is a good idea?Plot: Till 1980s, Ireland throw unwed mothers in prison their babies if not adopted, are starved to death and buried in mass grave, because premarital sex is a bible sin. 17 years old Amanda an unwed mother,...
by LeonJane 9 years ago
Are Kristen Stewart and Megan Fox a new generation of brat pack female actors?
by mr. daydream 9 years ago
Does the Transformers 2 (2009 second highest grossing movie) deserve a razzie best worst movie?
by Skaditch 9 years ago
Who would you rather have Megan Fox, Angelina Jolie or other?Ladies please feel free to answer, I saw the poll about Angelina Jolie. For me personally, I have to go with other. Lord have mercy do I love Reese Witherspoon!
by Steven Escareno 6 years ago
Okay, here's a forum where I want everyone to be brutally honest about how they feel about Michael Bay. Is he a misunderstood genius because all his films do make money, yet critics always seem harsh on his films. OR, is he really just an over rated hack, who represents everything wrong...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|