China ended the one-child policy in 2015, because it seems to result in a mass decrease of females
in the population (33 Million more men than women in 2015, according to Radio Free Asia); unregistered children born without a birth certificate above the one-child limit do not exist legally and cannot receive any legal employment, healthcare, education, or legal protection in China. Could this happen in other large nations, like India (which enforces 4 Million female sterilizations per year), Indonesia (where men have a birth control pill), or the United States? [image: By Carptrash (talk). Own work. CC BY-SA 3.0, https://en.wikipedia.org/
It won't be in the cards regarding North America any time soon. We've got oceans which act as a nice barrier against over-much immigration, you know.
It's all an ugly business; but we've got to address it. The rampant population growth affects everyone. But on the other hand, nature always moderates overpopulation of a species one way or another. It would be better were humanity to address the problem itself.
I don't have any children. So it is a foreign concept to me that one should see how many they can produce. There sure have been a few of my contemporaries locally who've fathered or birthed a lot of children they don't seem to care for.
I think that's right about nature intervening; and I also have no children, so it's all a bit foreign to me as well..
There is always that elephant in the room we try to ignore. Catholic dogma. Fornication that is not calculated to produce children is a sin. You can phrase it differently but that is the gist.
I published a hub that sort of refers to this situation. I have always said that even eons ago, if there hadn't been wars, plagues and deaths in such large numbers, can you imagine what this world would be like today?
It might be a decade before we know for sure how badly messed up the Pacific ocean is, and how what has gone on in Japan affects us all. I'm not saying 'yay radiation!' or anything; but just that it could be a bigger deal than we know. That's a thing
And Japan's population is decreasing overall, because its women beginning in the late 1980s began to put off marriage until after their 30s, if at all.
China's lack of women, seen also in India, is due to a severe cultural bias against women. In China, if you're allowed one child, they overwhelmingly make sure it is a boy by aborting the girls. If allowed two children, the first has a 50-50 chance of being a girl but the second child is a boy 75%+ of the time because they abort most of the girls.
Indian girls are aborted because of the dowry system. You have to pay someone to marry your daughter. Families may choose to keep one girl but kill/abort the rest, and even without sex selection abortion, don't bother getting the baby girls the medical care they would when sick as they would for a son.
I do not see a one child policy or two child policy being passed in any nations that don't already have it. The reasons why include:
* when people move to the city, birth rates drop to replacement level, and the world has hit 50% urbanization and the rate is going up; crowding is contrary to large families
* the average family size is already 2.5 children and dropping as people gain more control over fertility - the population growth we are seeing now is mostly due to the "Great Fillup" per Hans Rosling, as a generation of 2 billion children slowly replaces smaller generations until we hit 5 generations of 2 billion each for 10 billion people
* to maximize outcomes for their children, more people are choosing to have fewer children, and given the high cost of raising children in the developed world, they have fewer children to try to guarantee good outcomes - end result, we have declining populations in the West if we stop immigration
I too have no children for personal as well as medical reasons. Coming from a ghetto background strongly discouraged me from going the parental route. I wonder how many people in ugly, dangerous, poverty -stricken environments have kids simply because they don't know better. If so, then education can do much to solve the problem of overpopulation.
Yes, there should be this reason because even in china having Boy child is a priority of most of the married couples, and due to that there is continuous fear of imbalance in the society in terms of female population.
Secondly there is no proof that nature is continuously create new human being in rotation of one male child then one female child and again one male child and then one female child! So there is 100% Chances of their society being imbalanced in terms of unequal count of Male and Female citizens.
by JKSophie 6 years ago
A shocking news came out early this month about a 7-month pregnant Chinese woman who was forced to have an abortion because she already has a kid and cannot pay the fine of £4,000. This is one of the many painful instances brought by the one-child policy in China. Although, we cannot...
by Melvin Porter 8 years ago
China is about to relax it's "one child" policy they implemented about two decades ago to control it's population growth rate. China is doing this to increase the number of young people in the population and the work force to offset the demands of it's rapidly aging population.
by Divy Raghuvanshi 5 years ago
Is implementing one child policy the best but an indirect way of sustaining environment.as more number of people carry an equally greater demand for every possible thing ,which means more exploitation.more people will eat more thus need for more food an increased food demand means using more...
by pamij 4 years ago
I am finding it hard to fathom that in 2013 we still have underdeveloped countries, where people starve from lack of food, must drink from contaminated water sources and live in substandard shelter. My question is why does this occur when billions have been poured into these countries? What is...
by PositronWildhawk 4 years ago
Is China's "one child" policy sensible?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 5 years ago
According to the current United States Census Bureau report, the world population is 7.048 billion and counting. This is totally beyond human sustainability. If the population keeps on increasing, there will be more competition for the world's dwindling resources. ...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|