Hope Hicks to tetify Wednesday.Will she claim Executive Privilige?

1. 60

   Randy Godwinposted 4 years ago

   It's well known Hope Hicks is an insider when it comes to Trump's private dealings, but will she risk taking the fall to protect him when she comes before Congress?
   
   
   I "Hope" she tells the truth...do you?

   replyreport
2. 60

   Randy Godwinposted 4 years ago

   I wonder if she'll claim Executive Privilege or answer truthfully? We'll find out when the transcript is released.

   replyreport
   1. 88

      MizBejabbersposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I have no idee, but I'll be watching to see what she does.

      replyreport
      1. 60

         Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

         Trump is already claiming Executive privilege for the campaign, the transition, and Hicks time in the WH. I don't think he has a chance on the first two. He's simply playing for time in the courts.

         replyreport
         1. 89

            GA Andersonposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            He may be playing for time Randy, but I think that tactic will fail. I don't think he will have any more support for his declarations than that of "they're out to get me."
            
            I don't think his base is large enough to get him reelected. I am curious to see Ms. Hick's testimony.
            
            ps. Of course, as a white male dinosaur, I am rooting for her because she is so damn attractive. I ain't dead and Jimmy Carter nailed it.
            
            GA

            replyreport
            1. 60

               Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

               Me too, Gus. I don't believe she'll be too forthcoming though.

               replyreport
               1. 60

                  Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

                  Looks as if Hicks is not answering questions she should, as we suspected. EP doesn't cover the things she's not answering about. On to the courts...

                  replyreport
3. 0

   PrettyPantherposted 4 years ago

   I doubt she will behave any differently from the rest of the Trump sycophants, but maybe she'll surprise us.

   replyreport
4. 89

   IslandBitesposted 4 years ago

   Donald J. Trump
   DEMOCRAT CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS ARE #RIGGED!
   
   
   
   Someone is feeling uneasy. LOL!

   replyreport
   1. 88

      MizBejabbersposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, and today John Dean (I believe it was) said that there is no such thing as 100% immunity for anybody.

      replyreport
5. 67

   JAKE Earthshineposted 4 years ago

   
   
   Oval Office Obstruction of Justice CONTINUES as the Massive Cover UP Hides the TRUTH:
   
   "White House blocks former Trump aide from answering House panel’s questions, angering Democrats"
   
   https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpos … 403f1b3845

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Just a delay tactic and nothing more. The legal scholars say it's a sure thing in the courts Hicks and others will have to answer many of the questions asked of them.
      
      I'm about ready for Nancy to get off of her ass and start impeachment hearings. Anyone else? We cannot let this cretin get away with breaking the law so "glibly" as Shar is wont to say...

      replyreport
      1. 67

         JAKE Earthshineposted 4 years agoin reply to this

         Randy, never underestimate Nancy "POWERHOUSE" Pelosi: She's Strong, Intelligent, Deliberate and knows exactly what she's doing at all times, unlike serial liar circus mutant Clowny McTrump who will indeed be thrown in a  dingy prison cell sooner or later: The impeachment has essentially already begun, and these hearings are a prelude to said process:

         replyreport
         1. 60

            Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Jake, I'm still hopeful Nancy is doing the right thing, but it's taking longer than necessary.

            replyreport
            1. 67

               JAKE Earthshineposted 4 years agoin reply to this

               Randy, there's been a considerable increase in the number of Americans who favor impeachment after presidential candidates begin to expose the evidence against Donald and after Robert Mueller's Mega-BOMBSHELL issued via his STUNNING televised statement: This is just what we know so far, can you imagine what don't know and what the Impeachment Proceedings will UNCOVER ?
               
               Everyone except his last remaining cult followers want nothing but to see this circus clown receive justice both politically and through the court system and this will inevitably come if we still have laws, but we cannot argue with Nancy "Powerhouse" Pelosi's success: She understands the importance of building the groundwork and getting the MASSIVE Mountain of DAMNING Evidence to we the people, and by doing so, we've already experienced a 10 point jump in the number of Americans who support the IMPEACHMENT of this nightmarish oval office stooge:
               
               "New Poll Shows 10-Point Spike In Support for Impeachment Hearings"
               
               "Democrats who want Congress to act has surged by 18 percentage points in the last month"
               
               https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p … gs-848767/

               replyreport
6. 80

   Abecedarianposted 4 years ago

   I believe it was in an article today that said she was "tight lipped" and not answering questions about her time in the White House. White House lawyer Pat Cipollone sent a letter to Nadler stating the Hicks could not legally be required to talk about her time in the Trump Administration.  More obstruction from the Right.

   replyreport
7. 60

   Randy Godwinposted 4 years ago

   Yes Jake, although Hicks had almost half a dozen lawyers there to object to the majority of the questions, even one form the AG's office. Seems like a lot of lawyers if there's nothing to hide.
   
   But we already knew Trump's terrified of what Hicks may eventually tell congress.

   replyreport
   1. 67

      JAKE Earthshineposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      
      
      No surprise Randy, it must be a Gargantuan COVER UP: Look at what happened when his former personal attorney Michael Cohen started spilling the beans, Bozo Trump was IMMEDIATELY converted into what experts say is an "Un-Indicted Co-Conspirator in NY jurisdiction which in my opinion DISQUALIFIES him from running in 2020, McGahn DESTROYED him as well and Porn Actress Stormy Daniels EMASCULATED the poor 72 year old schlubb and YES, of course Donny Boy is running scared in a little tizzy fit because Hope Hicks subsequent to Nadler's insistence that she must answer questions, will be just another destructive Trump Skeleton:
      
      If I were in charge, I would have already had the Sergeant at Arms arrest this Russian Loving Presidential Impostor and tossed him in a musty damp holding cell pending his TRIBUNALS:

      replyreport
      1. 60

         Randy Godwinposted 4 years agoin reply to this

         I think Trump's depending on his conservative majority SCOTUS team to save his sorry ass. We'll soon see how "letter of the law" they really are.

         replyreport
         1. 67

            JAKE Earthshineposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            Randy, the supreme court can't save Donny when he's INDICTED

            replyreport
8. 60

   Randy Godwinposted 4 years ago

   After Hick's testimony--or lack of it--congress is encouraged the court will see the reasons for ruling against Trump's unlawful use of executive privilege for what it isn't supposed to cover.
   
   
   Hopefully the courts will expedite the ruling and both Hicks and McGann will have to testify.

   replyreport